- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 3,085
- Reaction score
- 821
Because they are not good enough athletes to beat their competitors it is as simple as that. How much skill does it take to take somebody down and beat the crap out of them? Did you even listen to the videos? Do you think you can go into a cage and take down Eddie hall and beat him by only doing skill training?I never said people need to know BJJ. I said skill and have specifically mentioned your striking claim. You are equating knowing multiple techniques with technical skill. I haven't said that.
Kron and Royce lost because they lacked the skills necessary to take the fight to the ground in a favourable position for them. They couldn't do basic wrestling and resorted to jumping guard or getting dropped to get to the ground.Their stand up skills were non existent. 100% they should have worked on wrestling at the least and developed their striking to a competent level. The issue was they stopped developing technically and everyone else caught up.
Why do you keep using examples that show that you need to develop skills to be successful in MMA? You keep making my point for me.
Either you guys are completely delusional about what fighting is or you are purposefully or accidentally promoting that skill and technique is what wins fights and that it gets you in shape to win fights. I am a certified black belt in martial arts and im telling you that a belt doesn't mean anything. How much brain power does it take to know that a better athlete is a better fighter? How much brain power does it take to know that a stronger more athletic you is a better fighter than if you weren't? How much sparring do you think it takes and only sparring to be a better fighter? I have sparred more people in my life that I can basically cut my eyeballs out and be able to do it. This is now tiresome. This is now pointless.
Last edited: