- Joined
- Jul 8, 2008
- Messages
- 3,166
- Reaction score
- 4
So I think we all agree that charging straight at a good boxer is not a smart game plan, a lesson that generously gifted to us by Ronda.
Now, if this is common knowledge to us as sherdoggers, then it would be extremely naive to even entertain the thought that the former Heavyweight UFC champion was unaware of this.
So how did this happen? What was Fabricio's game plan? Keep in mind that it wasn't a split second mistake, Werdum was charging straight at Stipe over and over.
I personally think he wanted to work in the clinch, more than just getting a takedown specifically. He did take a half hearted shot at one stage, but it looks to me like that was just to set up strikes.
My opinion is that he wanted the clinch, and decided to get there by charging at Stipe and forcing him into it, rather that setting it up and being patient.
He knew Stipe wanted to stay in boxing range, so while underestimating the challengers hands, Werdum was over confident, (almost cocky) and tried to force a clinch without any respect for the consequences.
Thoughts?
Now, if this is common knowledge to us as sherdoggers, then it would be extremely naive to even entertain the thought that the former Heavyweight UFC champion was unaware of this.
So how did this happen? What was Fabricio's game plan? Keep in mind that it wasn't a split second mistake, Werdum was charging straight at Stipe over and over.
I personally think he wanted to work in the clinch, more than just getting a takedown specifically. He did take a half hearted shot at one stage, but it looks to me like that was just to set up strikes.
My opinion is that he wanted the clinch, and decided to get there by charging at Stipe and forcing him into it, rather that setting it up and being patient.
He knew Stipe wanted to stay in boxing range, so while underestimating the challengers hands, Werdum was over confident, (almost cocky) and tried to force a clinch without any respect for the consequences.
Thoughts?