Why do you people still have an obsession with a drunk drug addict rapist? I get that he was one of your hero's 5 good wins, but he's entirely irrelevant to the discussion for the most part.
That might just be your reading comprehension issues. I've stated both that Khabib's first 15 opponents were cans and that he had only a handful of good wins in the UFC. Both statements are true.
This is a non-starter, meaningless statistic.
A fighter's greatness is judged by quality of opposition, wins, and title reigns. Finishes get thrown in as a secondary criteria, however, only Khabib nuthuggers have ever given even half a shit for "the most 10-8 rounds in UFC history" which really just shows there were a lot of rounds where Khabib should have finished the fight, but did not.
Against lesser competition and only a handful of good fighters, meanwhile Jones (who I'm not a fan of) fought nothing but the top of his division for a decade. Yea, no wonder Khabib had more 10-8s, he was fighting worse fighters you utter doofus.
No, that is an absurdly fucking retarded way of thinking. Who the UFC puts in their p4p rankings to advertise their fighters means nothing, though at the very least you are starting to lean towards an actual resume, which is how we've always judged fighters here in reality.
Tons of fighters would shitslam Khabib's first 15 effortlessly. Many of them would lose to Tibau (like Khabib did, but was gifted a robbery). "Without a scratch habibi" this is another made up Khabib fan "statistic".
"How many fighters can cook a full English breakfast?
"How many fighters have subbed two guys after tkoing a guy, then two decision following in that order?"
Same shit, meaningless when put into the context of him fighting only a handful of good fighters.
Had he stuck around, he would have lost rounds and fights like most other fighters do, he retired early to save his 0.
Too bad he didn't stick around to prove himself, had only a handful of good wins, and goes into the "what if" category for all times.
