International "We need Greenland" - Trump repeats threat to annex land of NATO member, UK lapdog govt. opposes but refuses to say would be against international law

When I say "America," I mean the executive branch, the one that signs treaties and moves ships, not the electorate. I don't think "the people" ever gave a shit about Greenland because they were too busy trying to put food on the table,but if we are to understand America as a super-organism that will go on for ages to come, then the idea of acquiring Greenland precedes and will transcend Trump's presidency. In the grand scheme of things, it actually does make sense.

As the Arctic waterways start slowly melting, America and every country surrounding that space is going to want to secure their dominance in the region. Owning Alaska and Greenland basically guarantees American supremacy over the Northwest Passage. Greenland also potentially has a metric fuck ton of rare earth metals that would reduce dependence on China almost completely. Owning that not only secures independence on substances necessary for military hardware (as I understand it) but it also ensure that you're enemies can't mine it for themselves.

There's also the matter of Russia arming their arctic north while Canada sort of sits there twiddling its thumbs doing nothing to ensure security in that region and if America is entering a multipolar world, they aren't exactly going to allow that to continue in there backyard.

With the exception of security from potential Russian aggression in the North, these weren't realities 70–150 years ago. These are emerging issues and saying "Trump wants natural resources" doesn't tell you anything.


Let me try again.

One day, with or without Trump, America will own Greenland.
You realize it’ll take thousands of years for any amount of ice melting to even think about the resources of Greenland right ?

The notion invading the country is a good idea is just dumb in a time we’re also telling other countries not to invade others even though we just did it anyways and it’s mostly clean energy under the ice which Trump isn’t even a fan of so this position is just laughable regardless , he’s just hurting us in every direction that’s a fact .

The probability the entire world will even be the same Is slim in the distance with rising waters , air pollution and disease will be much more concerning, interesting these things are not on Trumps important list right now in real time ?

It makes sense does it ………….yea sure it does , president Trump the self proclaimed president of peace is like honest John the car salesman telling you all his cars in the Lott are brand new . Lol
 
Last edited:
You realize it’ll take thousands of years for any amount of ice melting to even think about the resources of Greenland right ?

This isn't even remotely true. It's the ice free coastal strip that has the identifiable rare earths that are about 18% of the Earth's known reserves.

There are projects currently in development trying to set up shop and the Americans have blocked Chinese companies from trying to set foot on Greenland with the Danes obliging them on more than one occasion. We're talking within the next decade or two:

“We anticipate that by 2030, Greenland could supply 10-15% of the Western world’s heavy rare earth requirements,” projects Horn. “This would represent a transformation of global supply chains and significantly reduce China’s current near-monopoly position.”
 
This isn't even remotely true. It's the ice free coastal strip that has the identifiable rare earths that are about 18% of the Earth's known reserves.

There are projects currently in development trying to set up shop and the Americans have blocked Chinese companies from trying to set foot on Greenland with the Danes obliging them on more than one occasion. We're talking within the next decade or two:
Your projecting though , harsh environments aren’t going to let any significant amounts of those resources to get extracted anytime soon so yea let’s just invade everyone bc we’ll still be watching that ice melt by the time we’ve conquered everyone .


And again those are going to be energy sources most everyone will be swaying away from bc clean energy will eventually be the goal and we won’t be ahead bc this idiot president .Lol
 
Last edited:
Your projecting though , harsh environments aren’t going to let any significant amounts of those resources to get extracted anytime soon so yea let’s just invade everyone bc we’ll still be watching that ice melt by the time we’ve conquered everyone .


And again those are going to be energy sources most everyone will be swaying away from bc clean energy will eventually be the goal and we won’t be ahead bc this idiot president .Lol
How am I projecting? I'm just telling you what's being reported.
 
How am I projecting? I'm just telling you what's being reported.
What’s being reported and what’s reality are two different things , it’s not possible in 10 years that what you say will happen it’s actually close to 30 to 50 but even if it was 10 ,it’s just a stupid reason to illegally invade a country outright anyways and if you really think it’s a good idea you don’t understand right from wrong so I’ll leave it there .
 
For those who think getting a very little bit at one time immediately translates into a huge marketing ploy , here’s the insane reasoning to invade the country now . And other resources will be the standard by then but we’ll just ignore that to . Lol


The assertion that Greenland won’t be able to extract its resources for at least 30 years from now is largely accurate; large-scale, commercial extraction of Greenland's vast resources is widely expected to take many years, likely
at least a decade or more, and potentially closer to the 30-year timeframe, due to a combination of significant challenges. Experts note that it will take many years before Greenland earns substantial revenue from mining.
Key Challenges and Timelines:
  • Logistical Difficulties and Infrastructure: Greenland's harsh climate, remote landscape, lack of roads between settlements, and limited skilled local workforce present significant barriers. Companies must build entire infrastructures from scratch, making projects expensive and logistically demanding.
  • Political and Regulatory Hurdles: The Greenlandic government has prioritized environmental concerns and local self-determination, which has directly impacted timelines. A 2021 ban on uranium mining, which is often found alongside rare earth deposits, halted the major Kuannersiut project and led to ongoing arbitration, casting a shadow of political risk for investors.
  • Economic Viability: High start-up costs and operational expenses, combined with fluctuating global commodity prices, make long-term investment a high-risk endeavor requiring large, patient investors. Doubts remain about the commercial viability of many projects in the near term.
  • Environmental Concerns: Mining activities raise significant environmental issues, including pollution risks to delicate Arctic ecosystems and concerns about accelerating ice melt. Local opposition rooted in these concerns has also slowed development



Greenland also ended its oil attempts after 50 years trying but I bet anything Trump would use that as an excuse as well if he had to to invade and use threats anyway .The reality is decades from now renewable clean energy will be the standard so we’re just doing dumb shit to do dumb shit here .
 
Last edited:

I mean it’s not. This myth doesn’t pass the sniff test even before you look into it. Then of course, once you look into it even a cursory bit it’s quickly apparent it’s bs. But keep believing in fairytales if you want
 
Have you tried being a serious person?
200.gif
 
Every invasion of a country in my lifetime has been under a GOP controlled USA. The NeoCons saw old man Trump Sundowning and have talked a dude who campaigned on no wars into invading everyone. Trump in year in his second term bombed more foreign nations than any other President.
Imagine looking like such a fool saying you are voting for Trump over Kamala because you wanted no new wars. I think no group on the planet has been duped more and still supports the person duping them, than MAGA. Trump has done a shitty job with inflation and jobs as well. If you still support Trump after all his flip flops it’s either your fetish or you are in a cult.
Good to see the Neo Cons in control of the GOP again.
 
Every invasion of a country in my lifetime has been under a GOP controlled USA. The NeoCons saw old man Trump Sundowning and have talked a dude who campaigned on no wars into invading everyone. Trump in year in his second term bombed more foreign nations than any other President.
Imagine looking like such a fool saying you are voting for Trump over Kamala because you wanted no new wars. I think no group on the planet has been duped more and still supports the person duping them, than MAGA. Trump has done a shitty job with inflation and jobs as well. If you still support Trump after all his flip flops it’s either your fetish or you are in a cult.
Good to see the Neo Cons in control of the GOP again.
From
"The neocons were the problem! No new wars"
To
"Let's invade Greenland and go to war with Europe!"
These people don't have any values. The No New Wars stuff was just because it was rhetorically useful at the time. In the absence of values, every position is essentially a lie. That's Trump in a nutshell.
 
I mean it’s not. This myth doesn’t pass the sniff test even before you look into it. Then of course, once you look into it even a cursory bit it’s quickly apparent it’s bs. But keep believing in fairytales if you want

The fairytale has been put forward by several reputable sources. What, exactly, are your qualifications in the field of DNA Ancestry?
 
The "why" is important to flesh out despite your aversion to a lot of words. They don't want Russia or China to acquire those resources because it is quite literally essential for military hardware and therefore hemispheric supremacy. This is an extension of the Monroe doctrine but pointing to the North.

There's no question Trump wants to be the one, but that does not deny the reality that Greenland is still massively important to USA.
One last one here bc this is crazy talk .

Russia or China has no direct access to Greenland , China has been halted by the U.S in doing anything there .

Invading an Ally hurts more then helps significantly , new military advantage that outweighs the disruption of the NATO alliance is very bad . We have significant access to Greenland already ,forcefully taking it over is weakening us in other places , it’s just dumb there’s literally no change how we would use Greenland for military purposes as just a country we use now , where we could move more U.S structure there if we had to if we felt threatened by other countries.

Using ice melting to start a war in 2026 when we are head of NATO we might as well just convert to communism regime like Russia why hide it ,we’d respect you guys a lot more instead of dragging America through the dirt daily on here bc that’s what you’re doing being o.k with it ? 😂
 
Last edited:
Back
Top