Ways that Trump is worse than Hillary #1 - his cell phone

[Jack V Savage]

Wait. So he used a private phone to speak of Top secret shit? Cool, post the evidence

So you think Hillary should have been prosecuted? Because I actually don’t think she should have been

So who is the partisan here?

You are the partisan here. You were making a big deal of a much more minor security risk, while dismissing this one (and obviously no non-nutter thinks that either of them should be prosecuted for security protocol violations). That complete abandonment of a stated principle when it becomes inconvenient for your party is what partisanship is.

 

[bushman505]

So you don't believe he shared Israeli intelligence with them or told them the pressure was off since he fired nutjob Comey?

If there’s evidence then I’ll believe it, until then it’s just a liberal circle jerk.

 

[SBJJ]

You are the partisan here. You were making a big deal of a much more minor security risk, while dismissing this one (and obviously no non-nutter thinks that either of them should be prosecuted for security protocol violations). That complete abandonment of a stated principle when it becomes inconvenient for your party is what partisanship is.

But I don’t believe Clinton should have been prosecuted. You are the one saying this is such a grave security matter. But can’t provide proof anything happened

Is your partisanship so strong you now will just post shit with no back up. Oh wait, that is your usual MO

 

[SBJJ]

Your comparative indifference to a much more egregious security risk is a good example of partisanship. The alleged principle that taking risks with security is a dire offense (that justifies suspending rule of law and deciding presidential elections) is abandoned the second it becomes inconvenient for your party.

You are the partisan here. You were making a big deal of a much more minor security risk, while dismissing this one (and obviously no non-nutter thinks that either of them should be prosecuted for security protocol violations). That complete abandonment of a stated principle when it becomes inconvenient for your party is what partisanship is.

LOL! At least wait a page before contradicting yourself

 

[Jack V Savage]

LOL! At least wait a page before contradicting yourself

Hmm. Where do you think you see a contradiction?

But I don’t believe Clinton should have been prosecuted. You are the one saying this is such a grave security matter. But can’t provide proof anything happened

Is your partisanship so strong you now will just post shit with no back up. Oh wait, that is your usual MO

And what are you asking for proof of? Seems like that's already been settled.

 

[HomerThompson]

Hillary broke multiple federal laws while in office

No thanks, I'll use my white privilege to post where I like

And for fucks sake, isn't that cunts name in the thread title?

Get over it, she will never be president and trump will win next election over a divided left

I said she committed multiple felonies as acting Secretary of State, the biggest using an unsecured server to send Top Secret emails, and Obama recieved them from that server, so he had to allow those emails, I can't email the president, only vetted Email gets to them

What does this even mean?

I'm just tossing your own terms back at you

She lost. Get over it

There is zero evidence that he has used th phone for state matters. Zero.

Where is the evidence? More trash articles with poor sourcing.

It wouldn’t surprise me if he did it, but show the actual evidence. A dozen democrats calling for an investigation is not evidence. It’s partisan crap.

Lol at this guy calling other people morons.

She lost. Get over it.

Dump.

Has he taken a hammer to any of them yet?

This is the modern right, ladies and gentlemen. Not a substantive thought among them. Just deflection, and boobery.

 

[WTF2008]

The only law she broke was running for president with the wrong letter next to her name. Law enforcement made it clear that there wasn't a basis to even indict, much less convict, for anything related to IT security.

This is ridiculous to anyone that followed the story or knows anything about how classified information is supposed to be handled.

 

[HereticBD]

This is the modern right, ladies and gentlemen. Not a substantive thought among them. Just deflection, and boobery.

 

[SBJJ]

Hmm. Where do you think you see a contradiction?



And what are you asking for proof of? Seems like that's already been settled.

Oh. Please post the proof of Trump having Top Secret conversations on a private phone

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Surprised Trump uses Android seems like he would have an Iphone.

In the business world, if you use your devices for actual work, and not just dicking around, you tend to avoid Apple products.

 

[WTF2008]

This is the modern right, ladies and gentlemen. Not a substantive thought among them. Just deflection, and boobery.

Quote a bunch posts, offer absolutely no rebuttal for legitimate issues, insult anyone that doesn't agree with you and make up trendy names that'll get hashtags.

You're the reason Trump is President.

 

[HomerThompson]

Oh. Please post the proof of Trump having Top Secret conversations on a private phone

Please read the OP, including the links. Thanks.

 

[HomerThompson]

Quote a bunch posts, offer absolutely no rebuttal for legitimate issues, insult anyone that doesn't agree with you and make up trendy names that'll get hashtags.

You're the reason Trump is President.

Not a single post that I quoted raised a legitimate issue, or made a substantive argument.

And now, you're spiking the football after not even being in the game, much less scoring.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Oh. Please post the proof of Trump having Top Secret conversations on a private phone

I didn't say "top secret." Who the fuck knows that? But what I did say is clearly demonstrated in the OP.

You said that I contradicted myself somewhere. I asked where.

 

[WTF2008]

Not a single post that I quoted raised a legitimate issue, or made a substantive argument.

And now, you're spiking the football after not even being in the game, much less scoring.

You think I'm celebrating? Jesus.
Do you actually know anything about the issues with the Hillary email 'scandal'?

Do any of the links in this thread even come close to the egregious carelessness and lack of concern for classified information that was shown to have occurred with Hillary.

Do any of the links even say that Trump let classified information get out?
Or just that he has a personal cell phone?

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

But I don’t believe Clinton should have been prosecuted. You are the one saying this is such a grave security matter. But can’t provide proof anything happened

Is your partisanship so strong you now will just post shit with no back up. Oh wait, that is your usual MO

That which is asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.

 

[Execute]

In the business world, if you use your devices for actual work, and not just dicking around, you tend to avoid Apple products.

Not even remotely true. The adoption of Mac's in IT and Finance as well as iPhone's has increased quite a bit in the last decade.

 

[SBJJ]

I didn't say "top secret." Who the fuck knows that? But what I did say is clearly demonstrated in the OP.

You said that I contradicted myself somewhere. I asked where.

Are u unaware u said what Trump did was a SERIOUS OFFENSE.

Now your idea of proof of a serious offense is an unnamed source saying he has a private phone. LOL!!

So Trump commits a serious offense in one quote. But then when confronted on your partisanship you downplay it

 

[MacDuffle]

HAHA

“Nonsensical degree of proof” —- the only proof you’ve given is “read the article”.

You’re coming off really weak. Show me evidence. Someone writes it on a website and you pass it off as gospel.

Show me the evidence. If it exists I’ll go for it.

Hannity goes on air and lies to you daily which you try to pass off as truth. Remember you all coined the phrase alternative facts, own it.

You’re cringey.

I don’t watch Fox. I didn’t coin anything.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Are u unaware u said what Trump did was a SERIOUS OFFENSE.

I am aware that I did not say that.

BTW, I'm sure you'll now slink back and re-read more carefully. Let's see if you have the integrity to admit your mistake.

Now your idea of proof of a serious offense is an unnamed source saying he has a private phone. LOL!!

So Trump commits a serious offense in one quote. But then when confronted on your partisanship you downplay it

So this is all based on you simply misreading something. Thanks for clarifying.