- Joined
- Sep 28, 2011
- Messages
- 28,400
- Reaction score
- 0
That's a good way of looking at it and accurate I think.
Not that everyone on the business end of an exchange with you would have the integrity or the stones to admit it.
The problem is his subjective thought. He obeys a strict hierarchy of pedantic ideas. Like the idea that this kid is giving away financial advice is a fraud, while Jack's company does the same thing. Oh but that is different. I am sure he could rationalize anything with his purely subjective and static thought process. Fact is, he does what that guy does, but charges people for it. At first that stuff couldn't be predicted, now it can be predicted but only by people who are paid a lot. lol. There is no consistent logical thread at all. It is impossible to have an objective conversation with him. Like he works for a place that gives advice but then mocks such things. Then scrambles to, "well if he was that good, he would be making more money." It is garbage logic behind fixed beliefs.