War Room Lounge v86: Just ensure they don't accidentally 'ban' you

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Gregolian

You know that to have a ruling overturned they have to agree to hear a case that uses that opinion as the basis for a decision right and rule against the decision supported by the prior ruling right?

Yes. The new bloc will be eager to overturn bad precedent. Thomas and his ilk have a very different understanding of stare decisis than even Scalia did.
 
He's not exceedingly bright. That he's referring back to a much-maligned dissent by a guy widely considered to be the most incompetent Justice in modern history is lost on him. But, as I said before, anyone interested in the issue would be well off to read the actual majority opinion and Scalia concurrence. If you do both and are still somehow persuaded by Thomas, check in.
I know Scalia isn't viewed real well but I always enjoy reading his dissenting opinions for how, well, brash they are and politely calling his coworkers idiots basically.
 
I know Scalia isn't viewed real well but I always enjoy reading his dissenting opinions for how, well, brash they are and politely calling his coworkers idiots basically.

He was a pretty talented guy and had some very good opinions. Thomas has quite literally never had a convincing or impressive opinion.
 
He was a pretty talented guy and had some very good opinions. Thomas has quite literally never had a convincing or impressive opinion.
I have Scalia's book someplace in a stack of books I left at my folks house I haven't gotten around to reading. The one that was published shortly after his death.
 
I appreciate a candidate knowing when to drop out. Now if the rest of the non top 4 or 5 could, that would be great.
Nope, you get BLOOMBERG joining... and blowing up my fucking YouTube video watching with ads out the wazoo.
 
@Gregolian


The dissenting opinion I cited does not have force of law because Ginsburg and pals ruled that the federal government does have the authority to regulate marijuana for personal use. Another Trump appointment and that ruling will be overturned.

Did you agree with the majority in Dred Scott? I hope not. It was wrong at the time and it's still wrong now.
Oh lawd not Dred Scott again lmao
 
Whoa, I was not expecting that tbh.

Yeah. She's definitely in the tier that doesn't have a chance and I hope more non Biden/Bernie/Harris/Butt drop out very soon, but I didn't expect her to be one of the first there rather than holding on longer.

Wonder who she ends up endorsing. That could give a little bump. Also wonder if she's trying for AG cabinet position or will just go back to being Senator.
 
You get youtube ads? Are you on pc or phone for it?
If I watch YouTube on my smart TV or on like my phone there's no way to get an ad blocker.

On computer I don't.

Like, I was watching multiple Wildcat vids last night on my phone and EVERY SINGLE ONE had a fucking Bloomberg ad.
 
If I watch YouTube on my smart TV or on like my phone there's no way to get an ad blocker.

On computer I don't.

Like, I was watching multiple Wildcat vids last night on my phone and EVERY SINGLE ONE had a fucking Bloomberg ad.
That has to be annoying. I only watch on my PC or tablet due to all the ads.
 
Nope, you get BLOOMBERG joining... and blowing up my fucking YouTube video watching with ads out the wazoo.

I was home with my folks for Thanksgiving and they always have the TV on. Every fucking commercial break wether Macy's parade, football, nightly local news, NCIS re run, had a fucking Bloomberg ad on it
 
That has to be annoying. I only watch on my PC or tablet due to all the ads.
It drove me nuts. The part that kills me is how YouTube USUALLY fixes their ads based on your search history through Google and shit.

WHAT PART OF ME LOOKING AT AMMUNITION PRICES AND AR-15 parts makes you think I want to see a goddamn Bloomberg ad?


I was home with my folks for Thanksgiving and they always have the TV on. Every fucking commercial break wether Macy's parade, football, nightly local news, NCIS re run, had a fucking Bloomberg ad on it
It's the same 2 every time too
 
I'd offer you a bet on that, but I wouldn't want to take advantage of you. Remember the last time you tried to bet me?
Wait, so you spent 50% of your free time taking bets and being hard about it and then you get your account banned, so now it's all null and void?

How does it feel to have wasted that much time chasing a victory nobody cares about, only to have that tiny insignificant victory that you put this much time in taken away from you?
 
@HockeyBjj


Yeah, Nate Silver and Jack V Savage have been very skeptical of Bloomberg's ability to become a major player in this race. They didn't grasp the scale of the operation Bloomberg is running here. In Jack's case, he underestimates the power of money in determining election outcomes.
 
@Gregolian


The dissenting opinion I cited does not have force of law because Ginsburg and pals ruled that the federal government does have the authority to regulate marijuana for personal use. Another Trump appointment and that ruling will be overturned.

Did you agree with the majority in Dred Scott? I hope not. It was wrong at the time and it's still wrong now.
You lost all your bets because you can't even stay unbanned in this lenient shithole.
 
@tonni


No idea what you're talking about, Mr. ni. I am the betting champion. Just check the bet thread. I'm about to beat HomerThompson to become 8-1 and solidify my champion status.

Hail to the king.

By the way, you can't get rid of me.
Oh ow, who's gonna tell me?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top