War Room Lounge v86: Just ensure they don't accidentally 'ban' you

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL at thinking anyone had to communicate in order to identify you. White Belts don't post here.
 
JDragon said:
LOL at thinking anyone had to communicate in order to identify you. White Belts don't post here.
Click to expand...
This.

It's the indication of a fucking idiot to get banned in the WR and make a white belt account and all their posts be, in the WR again.
 
Gregolian said:
This.

It's the indication of a fucking idiot to get banned in the WR and make a white belt account and all their posts be, in the WR again.
Click to expand...

Speak for yourself I have spies tracking all banned posters and retread accounts.

<Baelish01>
 
Gregolian said:
This.

It's the indication of a fucking idiot to get banned in the WR and make a white belt account and all their posts be, in the WR again.
Click to expand...
Haha yeah what kind of fucking idiot would ever do that hahaha
 
I thought recently banned motherfuckers had to at least PRETEND to not be the recently banned motherfucker?



"I CAN'T EVEN BREATH UP IN THIS PIECE!!!!"
 
Mendacious said:
Wickard v Fillburn
Click to expand...
Wow, a Lounge poster who actually knows something about law and doesn't pretend to be a lawyer. What are your thoughts on Wickard?

I've been thinking about ICC recently and even re-examining Gibbons v Ogden. Any thoughts on that decision?
 
Gregolian said:
I thought recently banned motherfuckers had to at least PRETEND to not be the recently banned motherfucker?



"I CAN'T EVEN BREATH UP IN THIS PIECE!!!!"
Click to expand...

Well I technically was not recently banned, my last account here was probably 2-3 years ago.

Sherdog doesn’t care anymore probably because mods are better and because the site is declining. It feels like every thread I go to no matter what sub forum I’m seeing the same motherfuckers. I don’t recall it being like that 10 years ago.
 
LiquidityTrap said:
Wow, a Lounge poster who actually knows something about law and doesn't pretend to be a lawyer. What are your thoughts on Wickard?

I've been thinking about ICC recently and even re-examining Gibbons v Ogden. Any thoughts on that decision?
Click to expand...
I don’t know shit about law, Wickard v. Fillburn is just such an egregious example that it’s easy to understand they were making some big leaps in logic.
 
Hey guys, its cool to be a racist piece of shit on here! You just do it until they ban you, then later that day come back and pretend not to be a racist anymore.
 
Sycho Sid said:
Hey guys, its cool to be a racist piece of shit on here! You just do it until they ban you, then later that day come back and pretend not to be a racist anymore.
Click to expand...
REALLY?! Sweet



 
@Mendacious

Yeah, I asked @Trotsky to explain how growing a product for personal use only, with that product never crossing state lines could possibly fall under "interstate commerce". He responded with paragraphs that didn't even come close to answering the question.

It's very convenient for people to ignore the ICC in their quest to create new federal programs. Thomas's jurisprudence points strongly in the direction of overturning Wickard and putting the federal government on a solid constitutional foundation. Now we've got Gorsuch too. Kavanaugh seems ok but I haven't read enough of his opinions to judge. I'm also concerned that Trump will nominate Barrett to replace Ginsburg (Axios reported this). I'm not convinced she's an originalist at all.
 
Sycho Sid said:
Hey guys, its cool to be a racist piece of shit on here! You just do it until they ban you, then later that day come back and pretend not to be a racist anymore.
Click to expand...


Well being a racist pos always has been cool here (otherwise it would be very empty). Just acting the part is not accepted it seems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,082
Messages
57,967,391
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top