War Room Lounge V48: Everybody's a little racist, except me

[JamesRussler]

That is a typo. This is how it works. They file a motion. Then pursuant to

FRAP 27
. (B) Request for affirmative relief. A response may include a motion for affirmative relief. The time to respond to the new motion, and to reply to that response, are governed by Rule 27(a)(3)(A) and (a)

You file a response with a separate motion for affirmative relief.

then and there is a option for this in ecf. You can ask to be assigned the same panel as another appeal pursuant to

Circuit Advisory Committee Note to Rule 34-1 to 34-3 (1) Appeals Raising the Same Issues. When other pending cases raise the same legal issues, the Court may advance or defer the hearing of an appeal so that related issues can be heard at the same time. The first panel to whom the issue is submitted has priority. Normally, other panels will enter orders vacating submission and advise counsel of the other pending case when it appears that the first panel's decision is likely to be dispositive of the issue.

that creates a docket entry in that appeal and triggers a right from the parties to that appeal to respond. Does that make sense?

Oh I see. Yeah, I don't think I've ever used that rule before. I haven't been hit with too many motions on appeal, other than motions to transmit exhibits and boring stuff like that (which I don't oppose). Definitely will keep that rule in mind.

TBH, I don't really care what panel I get as long as I get a favorable ruling. I guess if it's a case with a real novel issue, and I anticipate it being published, then I guess I'd try to steer it toward other similar cases. They should have an option to paper appellate judges, just like they have in superior court lol. Like just paper the whole panel.

 

[Limbo Pete]

"People," hmmm. Sure.

Well, we've already established that at least one "person" here is actually just a bunch of rats in a big coat, so the term is a bit loose by default

 

[JamesRussler]

My name is James Russler, and it's been suspected for some time that i'm actually a couple dozen large rats inside a trenchcoat. I hope to escape this website before someone blows the whistle.
Thanks fer comin' out

Hi, I'm Limbo Peter, and I'm a "historian" because I (almost) have my Masters in Native American history, or some useless shit like that.

 

[Jesus H. Sherdog]

What are people's thoughts on wearing boots with suits?

Cowboy boots? What kinda boots we taking here? Timbs?

 

[The Diplomat]

Well, we've already established that at least one "person" here is actually just a bunch of rats in a big coat, so the term is a bit loose by default

Oh who could that be

 

[all caps]

People think it is a very bad idea

I think its the low T tbh

 

[Quipling]

Cowboy boots? What kinda boots we taking here? Timbs?

Something like these, but probably not brogues:

I'm prejudiced against boots with suits as a matter of principle, but I recently decided that I really don't like walking to court in the snow or rain.

 

[all caps]

Why so insecure?

I meant to quote this post

 

[Limbo Pete]

Hi, I'm Limbo Peter, and I'm a "historian" because I (almost) have my Masters in Native American history, or some useless shit like that.

Weee arrre a humansss
It givessss usss the cheeeesesss

 

[sickc0d3r]

The first photo is irrelevant, obviously.

Because we go 100% organic, we can't allow the plums to fully ripen as in the photo or the bugs will destroy them. They fall off much easier when they are ripe, which makes them amenable to the method in that photo. When they are unripe, we must pick by hand.

 

[PolishHeadlock2]

Something like these:

I'm prejudiced against boots with suits as a matter of principle, but I recently decided that I really don't like walking to court in the snow or rain.

We had PWC in recently and one of the guy wore dress shoes with no socks.....

It was very distracting and eventually one of the older PWC partners made a crack at him for it and I was like "finally somebody mentioned this shit" lol

I guess it's the "in" thing now but I couldn't pay attention to anything he said because of it

 

[Jesus H. Sherdog]

Something like these:

I'm prejudiced against boots with suits as a matter of principle, but I recently decided that I really don't like walking to court in the snow or rain.

Pfft those look fine to me.

 

[Lord Coke]

Oh I see. Yeah, I don't think I've ever used that rule before. I haven't been hit with too many motions on appeal, other than motions to transmit exhibits and boring stuff like that (which I don't oppose). Definitely will keep that rule in mind.

TBH, I don't really care what panel I get as long as I get a favorable ruling. I guess if it's a case with a real novel issue, and I anticipate it being published, then I guess I'd try to steer it toward other similar cases. They should have an option to paper appellate judges, just like they have in superior court lol. Like just paper the whole panel.

You can't do this if you wait until you get a panel assignment. The only reason to do this is if you have a novel issue of law and will be bound by a panel decision of a appeal that is ahead of you. Then you can argue that you should have the right to be heard prior to the Ninth creating precedent you will be bound by.

 

[JamesRussler]

Weee arrre a humansss
It givessss usss the cheeeesesss

 

[all caps]

Real answer - no, no boots with a suit. No bueno amigo

 

[The Diplomat]

Hi, I'm Limbo Peter, and I'm a "historian" because I (almost) have my Masters in Native American history, or some useless shit like that.

Which one were you again?

 

[sickc0d3r]

What are people's thoughts on wearing boots with suits?

Gotta be manly to pull it off, but go with Cowboy boots and thank me later.

 

[Fawlty]

Women should wear boots with suits for sure. It's a powerful expression of the legs and coolly vagina-affirming.

 

[JamesRussler]

Which one were you again?

I'm the guy who is made up of rats in a trench coat

 

[JamesRussler]

It's a powerful expression of the legs and coolly vagina-affirming.