• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

War Room Lounge V48: Everybody's a little racist, except me

How Racist are You?


  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
Or maybe she just hates me.
giphy.gif
 
Get ready for a long winded irl lecture on supply and demand from the shadows of a dimly lit doorway

I was on the other end of that once with someone who was looking for signatures for their rent-control ballot initiative. We got into it for a bit, but I did end by saying that while I wouldn't vote for his measure, out of respect for his time, I'd sign the petition. He said that was good enough, and we shook hands.
 
I was on the other end of that once with someone who was looking for signatures for their rent-control ballot initiative. We got into it for a bit, but I did end by saying that while I wouldn't vote for his measure, out of respect for his time, I'd sign the petition. He said that was good enough, and we shook hands.
I bet @waiguoren gives terrible handshakes
 
BET Me!!! WIP IT OUT RIGHT NOW NEXT TO A RULER AND PM IT TO A MOD!!!!!

Me not talking things to seriously................
tell me about your plums

I filed a series of 28j letters over the course of two months after I filed my opening brief but before the filing of the other sides answering brief after i found out about the NRA's legal theory. My opposing counsel filed a motion to strike. I filed this response. Which I think is some of my best work to date.

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Young-v.-Hawaii_Response-to-Motion-to-Strike.pdf


I asked for affirmative relief which is only allowed for if the other side files a motion in the form of a supplemental brief. After it was lodged by the Court pending review by my panel, I filed a motion to be assigned the same panel as the NRA's case in Jackson v San Francisco. This make a docket entry in the NRA"s appeals docket. Which would alert their panel to my legal theory. After that I prayed for the best and thankfully Judge Ikuta wrote a great opinon in Jackson even though no one knows it because the NRA billed it was a loss for the Second even though the NInth took a much more pro gun position than the NRA was advocating for.


edit yes. Jon was moonlighting as my paralegal for this one. He did all the formatting, proofreading ran errands and vetted the arguments so that i got them down to where a layperson could understand them. I was helping him get ready for a fight so our deal was he helped me with this every day after training.
Hey @Lead if this guy is going to keep exposing his identity every three days, can we not be bothered with requests not to call him a:eek::eek::eek: please?

Just as a courtesy. I mean, lol, ya know.
 
I was on the other end of that once with someone who was looking for signatures for their rent-control ballot initiative. We got into it for a bit, but I did end by saying that while I wouldn't vote for his measure, out of respect for his time, I'd sign the petition. He said that was good enough, and we shook hands.

I was recently at a Street fair drinking when a couple of college kids asked me for a signature to get a Libertarian on the ballot.

I started explaining to them how I was once a Libertarian and the pitfalls of their ideology but than I realized it was for City Council and said "fuck it I'll sign he's not going to do any damage in this race".
 
Last edited:
That's pretty useful info. Nobody's filed a "motion in the form of a supplemental brief" on me yet (not that I recall anyway), but I will keep that in mind.

You somehow seem to get the best panels. You got Ikuta with O'Scannlain on your recent Young appeal, right? I like Ikuta, but she has fucked me over too many times. I groan every time I get her. I don't think she likes my clients very much. Or maybe she just hates me.



You could have him deliver a "motion to strike" opposing counsel in the face! No but seriously, that's the only Jon Koppenhaver I've ever heard of, so I immediately thought of him.



That is a typo. This is how it works. They file a motion. Then pursuant to

FRAP 27
. (B) Request for affirmative relief. A response may include a motion for affirmative relief. The time to respond to the new motion, and to reply to that response, are governed by Rule 27(a)(3)(A) and (a)

You file a response with a separate motion for affirmative relief. In this case I asked for the right to file a supplemental brief.

then and there is a option for this in ecf. You can ask to be assigned the same panel as another appeal pursuant to

Circuit Advisory Committee Note to Rule 34-1 to 34-3 (1) Appeals Raising the Same Issues. When other pending cases raise the same legal issues, the Court may advance or defer the hearing of an appeal so that related issues can be heard at the same time. The first panel to whom the issue is submitted has priority. Normally, other panels will enter orders vacating submission and advise counsel of the other pending case when it appears that the first panel's decision is likely to be dispositive of the issue.

that creates a docket entry in that appeal and triggers a right from the parties to that appeal to respond. Does that make sense?
 
Are you trying to reset your GE light bulbs?

...this is how

 
What cause? Lol, I am not looking for anyone's approval. No offense but I don't care what you think about me. I'm just bringing the situation to light. He's trash and that's how I am going to treat him

You are talking to those who do not know how to penetrate. As you were my beautiful flesh...
 
Don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya

Lol hey there, Pete. It's June now. You graduate yet? Have you secured long term employment? You can always apply on for a job with your school if you need something to tide you over.
 
Lol. You know that I am successful. You are so jealous. You were clowning it up with Josh on the offshoot with a pic of my father and I. Yeah, I know.

You're trash dude. I made sure you got back here. You begged like a bitch too. Crying every step of the way. Nobody respects you. You're essentially a carnival worker. This is all you have.
Interdasting. Salty does that and yet he tried to have someone banned for posting a pic that he himself posted on here.
 
Lol hey there, Pete. It's June now. You graduate yet? Have you secured long term employment? You can always apply on for a job with your school if you need something to tide you over.
My name is James Russler, and it's been suspected for some time that i'm actually a couple dozen large rats inside a trenchcoat. I hope to escape this website before someone blows the whistle.
Thanks fer comin' out
 
I bought my daughter a shirt from American Eagle yesterday. The lady at the register tells me the price, then says its going to pop up on the screen for donations for LGBTQ's. I asked her "for what?" She looked at me like I was the devil. I said "you dont just ask people to donate money to a group like that, what is the money used for?, does its just go to LGBTQ people for being who they are, and they just give them money?". Again, she looks at me and gives some kind of heavy sigh. I told her i no longer wanted the shirt and walked out.
 
This is interesting. You eat organic and in the past you've posted about not training in certain cities because the air pollution would hurt your health in the long term.

How do you reconcile this stuff with Trump and the GOPs assault on the EPA and the environment at large?
I think the EPA's proper role is keeping air and water clean, and I support efforts to reorient the EPA in that direction*. The vast majority of the MSM criticism of the Trump administration on environmental issues/EPA that I have seen relates to greenhouse gas regulation. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant in the traditional sense and the notion that we are going to make a serious dent in global warming by subsidizing renewables or restricting the output of fossil fuel plants is extremely unlikely, in my estimation. On the other hand, it is likely to retard economic growth and technological progress.




*Technically the EPA is unconstitutional, but that's a minor issue in this discussion as I fully support a federal role there so long as it's constitutionally authorized. Ron Paul is wrong on this point.
 
You don't have to say the shirt was for your daughter, we know it was for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top