War Room Lounge V26: Neoliberal Clicks

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds pretty good but I have a few questions about it:

- How do you moderate the now ascendant Catholic majority from wanting to use their power to punish the minorities?

- How do you handle dissident groups?

- Does everyone have equal standing or do some groups have less rights due to their beliefs, or else have to pay say a religious tax for their troublesome activities in the society?

- How does Catechism apply to the realms of Law and Trade Principles without causing major disruptions and poverty in the society?

The questions are not for criticism, I want to see alternative approaches to how this framework might work.

I think the realm of rule and the realm of spiritualism are better as separate domains, but the more of the latter we have the better.
Good thoughts man.
 
Good post, kind of like I'm trying to be the Donnie of the War Room and your suddenly coming in as the Walter!

SHUT THE FUCK UP, INTERNETHERO!

Don't give me a heartattack, bro!

lol

Let's kick some nihilist-ass.

Where's @N13? 99%-sure that dude owns ferrets.
 
I'd wither away quick without gifs

I think you could rise to the challenge. But like the rest of us, you'd ask yourself "Why?". It's like sports commentary. There's the play-by-play and the color. Imagery is the color.
 
lol

Let's kick some nihilist-ass.

Where's @N13? 99%-sure that dude owns ferrets.
Would U like me to play the nihilist temporarily?

It is really easy. Not much to it. The only problem is that it is a form of anti human species being so if you do it for too long, you get all messed up.
 
"Memes" are garbage.
You see precisely how much actual communication happens on image forums and through cut and pasting.
Images and videos can be relevant and drive conversation, but so often they aren't and don't.
 
My result was centre right and leaned downwards towards authoritarian. I definitely have a soft-spot for religious authoritarianism. I'm one of those people who could live in an ideal theocracy where the poor and misfortunate are cared for, political policy focuses on benefiting families and there are extremely high expectations regarding standards of behaviour and morality.
In a perfect world, or even a world with a perfect way to know who was not corrupt in order to ensure putting only them in charge, that would be great. Instead, life is messy, and you tilt at authoritarian windmills nevertheless. Not very realistic for a pessimist.
 
upload_2018-12-28_0-37-38.jpeg
th

th

th



@Cubo de Sangre

The King:
th
 
All memes are removed. Regular threads are for discussion of the topic at hand. If you like the meme, just post it in the meme thread.
There must be a different definition of meme than the one I've come to understand from some people around here but I'm glad to my original understanding is in line with the mods. I post gifs and I haven't received any notification of them being deleted so I assume that's not the same thing. Anyway, I had no idea there was such a rule but I would like to think we could do without it; rather a "we reserve the right to delete memes at any time and/or the right to flog serial offenders" type of rule would be better IMHO.
 
Last edited:
I think you could rise to the challenge. But like the rest of us, you'd ask yourself "Why?". It's like sports commentary. There's the play-by-play and the color. Imagery is the color.
I once took a challenge on here to communicate only with gifs for something like 2 weeks
It was a lot of fun
 
I once took a challenge on here to communicate only with gifs for something like 2 weeks
It was a lot of fun

Fair enough. To me that's like being the one-legged man in the ass-kicking contest. Words and pics is how this shit is done for maximum effect.


tomlin-celebrates.gif
 
War Room elections exempted of course.

You call defending the 2nd Amendment "identity politics". Kinda hard to take some foreigner serious at that point. And of course, I don't bother to follow whatever your nation does, since mine leads the dance. So other than (hopefully) despising US foreign policy, I don't see where our interests around here overlap. But my posting history is out there and you're a smart dude who likes to research shit. Have at it.
 
You call defending the 2nd Amendment "identity politics". Kinda hard to take some foreigner serious at that point. And of course, I don't bother to follow whatever your nation does, since mine leads the dance. So other than (hopefully) despising US foreign policy, I don't see where our interests around here overlap. But my posting history is out there and you're a smart dude who likes to research shit. Have at it.

Yup. Looks like what passes from you for a political opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top