I apologize I'm a bit tired and the acronym isn't registering and google isn't helping. Black Asses Matter?Perhaps, and their organizers are just as myopic? BAM isn't implying an end goal?
It is a little weird if we're talking about America. It already is very multi-ethnic, and most people of all ethnic groups are fine with that--celebrate it even. If you have a problem with it, what are you going to do? Send non-whites to concentration camps? Wouldn't it more easier and more humane for you to just take your ugliness to a country that's already all-white or close to it?
I apologize I'm a bit tired and the acronym isn't registering and google isn't helping. Black Asses Matter?
It recently became more multi-ethnic, only a few decades ago. Prior to that it was a white country made by white people for white people with an immiscible African descendant group that should never have been here.
It's rather interesting, because in the same way and for the same reasons you're interested in disparaging tribalism and in-group preference to work towards a society where everyone no matter their genetic cluster, ethnicity, or values can live under the same rules and laws is as naive and ignorant as the communists and social constructionists that imagine they can manipulate people into selfless automatons working for collectivist goals.
Not even true. What's happened is that the previous multi-ethnic group blended and formed a new ethnic identity (at least as you're defining it--still not sure that most Italian-Americans would like to be seen as the same ethnicity as Irish-Americans, for example).
Well, I disagree and think that the success of America refutes your collectivism. But, again, if you hate this country so much, why not find a new one?
All those listed are apart of the same genetic cluster as Europeans.... Caucasians... as opposed to Asians and Africans. I don't understand the "not even true" part.
Yeah, the success of the US is by virtue of the codified rights it was founded on... Individual rights no other population majority except for a genetic cluster among Caucasians adopted and valued.
You're equivocating on "ethnicity," no?
Anyway, like I said, it would be easier for you to and the 5,000 or so people who believe what you do to leave than to expect more than a third of Americans to leave, especially when most of the other two-thirds don't want that.
I agree that our system of gov't--which includes civic nationalism--is more effective, more just, and more rational than previous forms. If you want to start another ethnostate, do it somewhere else. We're good here.
You're equivocating on "ethnicity," no?
Anyway, like I said, it would be easier for you to and the 5,000 or so people who believe what you do to leave than to expect more than a third of Americans to leave, especially when most of the other two-thirds don't want that.
I agree that our system of gov't--which includes civic nationalism--is more effective, more just, and more rational than previous forms. If you want to start another ethnostate, do it somewhere else. We're good here.
So, right. AA's shouldn't leave. But they demonstrably should have their own society within the geographic US. They are, at this point their own unique genetic cluster significantly distinct from other African groups by virtue of European intermixing (presumably because of slave rape). Even still, its abundantly clear from their polled values, similar to the South and Central African migrants that they do not share the fundamental values whites had (and only a majority of whites still have) when they created the country i.e. limited government, freedom of speech, and an individual right to bear arms among the most significant issues.
So basically if we allow minorities to vote, we might end up with a Nordic-style social democracy, and the only way to fight that horrible possibility is to have a country governed only by whites because whites would never vote for that shit.
I don't know what this "we" shit is. There's no "we" when goals for a society are fundamentally polar among groups of people. That's a fucking disaster waiting to happen.... and already is.
To your proposal though, most likely not when you look at the structures of the societies other groups are coming from or even came from centuries ago. Ideas of Egalitarianism are uniquely European in nature... if that's what you're implying. The selection event that pushed the group of Europeans to this country are, however, distinct with their values, again demonstrably, when you look at polled issues. The only majority population that still supports the core values white aristocrats founded the US on are.... white.
Seems that you're stretching mightily to avoid the conclusion that race doesn't really seem to have an impact on political preferences.
I understand that even though you are American, you identify as white more than American. But "we" is us. Americas.
OK. Care to share any data that supports this claim?