WAR ROOM LOUNGE V23: November Sixth LOOMS

[Greoric]

First, why the hell is this in the lounge thread? We're talking about white nationalists and their inextricable link with mainstream conservatives like you.

Second, my objection with that quote is that it plays on the racist stereotype of nonwhite violent tendencies. Blacks and Latinos might become the numerical majority at some point... if they stop killing each other... because that's what those people do!

Here's where you bust out crime figures and say that it's a totally factual statement. King is just a truth teller.

Your objection is to stating a fact? Or an objection that those two groups have in-group preferences independent of one another?

 

[ultramanhyata]

Rip is a mod troll account? Which mod? Double secret PM me if nec.

I don't know his identity. But I have seen it claimed in the forums at least twice now in the past couple weeks.

 

[Quipling]

Or pants.

We can compromise. Tie, but no pants.

 

[ultramanhyata]

Wait what? What proof do you have? Sounds like the Sherscoop of the decade.

I only have the proof of the posts I have read. I'm sure others who spend more time here and in the OT can fill you in.

 

[Greoric]

Or how about they are a bunch of misfit shitheads, the vast majority of whom couldn't articulate a cogent political philosophy if their lives depended on it. They might have some specific thing individually that they are pissed off about, but to attribute a collective political philosophy to that bunch of retards is absurd.

Perhaps, and their organizers are just as myopic? BAM isn't implying an end goal?

 

[Anung Un Rama]

I don't know his identity. But I have seen it claimed in the forums at least twice now in the past couple weeks.

I'd put money on it that he is not a mod troll account.
If it is, then that is a cry for help from a very lonely mod. Condolences @Peteyandjia

 

[Anung Un Rama]

We can compromise. Tie, but no pants.

Watch out for this one, too @Gregolian

 

[Possum Jenkins]

Your objection is to stating a fact? Or an objection that those two groups have in-group preferences independent of one another?

It is not a fact that Latinos and blacks will kill each other and thus prevent them from reaching numerical majority status.

 

[My Spot]

@HunterSdVa29 let him know about 29 palms

I'm well aware of it, I spent a month there in the summertime.

 

[Islam Imamate]

@ultramanhyata

I've always felt that ripskater trolls but isn't entirely a troll. I think his gimmick is to an extent genuine in that he's actually a religious Christian irl but I also think he deliberately posts in a manner that can be described as trolling. The best example is his "aww shucks" routine; post and outrageous claim agaisnt the left/Democrats/progressives, someone asks him to verify it or debunks it, and he responds with some variation of "aww shucks" but continues to make similar claims elsewhere as if he was never corrected. He knows those claims rile up the opposition against him and his bedfellows to his side and that's what they are there for.

 

[Greoric]

It is not a fact that Latinos and blacks will kill each other and thus prevent them from reaching numerical majority status.

Odds are good they will not survive under the same governance when whites are no longer in a majority to hold up a fantasy of multiculturalism. Whether that goes kinetic, I agree, is not certain.

 

[Gregolian]

@ultramanhyata

I've always felt that ripskater trolls but isn't entirely a troll. I think his gimmick is to an extent genuine in that he's actually a religious Christian irl but I also think he deliberately posts in a manner that can be described as trolling. The best example is his "aww shucks" routine; post and outrageous claim agaisnt the left/Democrats/progressives, someone asks him to verify it or debunks it, and he responds with some variation of "aww shucks" but continues to make similar claims elsewhere as if he was never corrected. He knows those claims rile up the opposition against him and his bedfellows to his side and that's what they are there for.

How the fuck did YOU get carded?

Push some mod over the edge making fun of their chosen sports team?

 

[Fawlty]

I don't know his identity. But I have seen it claimed in the forums at least twice now in the past couple weeks.

Unless there is some other rip CT I don't know about, I'm assuming this stems from Madmick's profile status being "ripskater"

 

[Trotsky]

Odds are good they will not survive under the same governance when whites are no longer in a majority to hold up a fantasy of multiculturalism. Whether that goes kinetic, I agree, is not certain.

Lol, what a classic flow of conversation with Greoric:

Thousands of Republicans vote for an open Nazi ====> but why aren't we talking about communists???? ===> anti-fascists are the actual fascists ===> whites are the only benevolent race and multiculturalism is doomed to fail.​

 

[Greoric]

Lol, what a classic flow of conversation with Greoric:

Thousands of Republicans vote for an open Nazi ====> but why aren't we talking about communists???? ===> anti-fascists are the actual fascists ===> whites are the only benevolent race and multiculturalism is doomed to fail.​

What's a more open society to outsiders in comparison to* the US?

 

[Islam Imamate]

How the fuck did YOU get carded?

Push some mod over the edge making fun of their chosen sports team?

JIDF mods coming after me.

 

[Trotsky]

What's a more open society to outsiders other than the US?

I have no idea. Maybe none. I'm sure Chile, Germany, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, Urguay, Chile, Mexico, and Costa Rica all deserve to be somewhere on the list, but whether they are more immigrant/visitor-friendly, I cannot say.

My question is: why did you immediately deflect from a story about Republicans voting for a Nazi to pivot to "but communists are worse" and then transition clumsily into your usual ethnonationalist spiel? Like, if you want to deflect, try and be more subtle. Or just make your own thread about what you do want to talk about (brown people being subhuman, private property rights being natural, modern economics being a conspiracy, etc.)

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

We can compromise. Tie, but no pants.

That only looks good on women.

 

[Greoric]

I have no idea. Maybe none. I'm sure Chile, Germany, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, Urguay, Chile, Mexico, and Costa Rica all deserve to be somewhere on the list, but whether they are more immigrant/visitor-friendly, I cannot say.

My question is: why did you immediately deflect from a story about Republicans voting for a Nazi to pivot to "but communists are worse" and then transition clumsily into your usual ethnonationalist spiel? Like, if you want to deflect, try and be more subtle. Or just make your own thread about what you do want to talk about (brown people being subhuman, private property rights being natural, modern economics being a conspiracy, etc.)

Ah yes, Germany and Canada? So other white countries?

Curious though. How do you get "brown people are subhuman" from an advocacy that white people should be able to have their own countries?

 

[Jack V Savage]

Ah yes, Germany and Canada? So other white countries?

Curious though. How do you get "brown people are subhuman" from an advocacy that white people should be able to have their own countries?

It is a little weird if we're talking about America. It already is very multi-ethnic, and most people of all ethnic groups are fine with that--celebrate it even. If you have a problem with it, what are you going to do? Send non-whites to concentration camps? Wouldn't it more easier and more humane for you to just take your ugliness to a country that's already all-white or close to it?