WAR ROOM LOUNGE V12: Mao With Noir

Status
Not open for further replies.
Over 6'6", sure. I'll concede that. But is that inconsistent with "stiff"? Michaels did carry his ass.
I think so. Also stiff usually means working realistically.

You have to have a different standard for the big guys. No one over 6'8" is ever going to be able to work like Angle, or Brett. But, Undertaker was fantastic for a near 7 footer. Very agile, and would take good bumps as well.
 
I ate an edible the other day and couldnt talk and ended up lost downtown for eight hours so I slept most of yesterday. What did I miss?
Dude whose name has Thanos Gauntlet in it someplace is obviously a banned poster and isn't even barely trying to hide it.
 
I think so. Also stiff usually means working realistically.

You have to have a different standard for the big guys. No one over 6'8" is ever going to be able to work like Angle, or Brett. But, Undertaker was fantastic for a near 7 footer. Very agile, and would take good bumps as well.
Harper is like a younger more athletically inclined Taker. At least to me.
 
Yeah, Harper is really athletic for a big dude.

The Bludgeon Brothers are over with me.
Harper is fast as fuck for a guy his size too.

He's fast as fuck, when he hits people with that boot or clothesline he uses it looks brutal as fuck but he's never potato'd or hurt anyone with them as far as I know.
 
I think so. Also stiff usually means working realistically.

You have to have a different standard for the big guys. No one over 6'8" is ever going to be able to work like Angle, or Brett. But, Undertaker was fantastic for a near 7 footer. Very agile, and would take good bumps as well.

I mean Taker was A stiff, not that he worked stiff.

What was so quality about Michaels and Benoit? I clearly don't understand what makes a technically high quality professional wrestler. Would you say Sexual Chocolate Mark Henry is top 5 GOAT, or merely top 10?

Selling (both of individual spots and in terms of consistency), spot quality, pacing, story-telling within the match, transitions (notice how some spots require one guy to do nothing for an implausibly long time or generally behave stupidly--good transitions are the opposite of that), variety. You don't have to break it all down like that, but if you watch a lot, you'll notice that some guys' matches are always fun to watch, while other guys suck.

Even though Hogan was terrible, I think he really illustrates the storytelling aspect with something he used to do. In a lot of his matches, he'd go for the bodyslam on the fat guy, and hurt his back, maybe once or twice in the match. So then when he hit it later, after some additional desperation and motivation, it would seem a lot more meaningful. On its own, it's a pretty lame spot, but within the context of the match, it would seem cool. That's like the most basic, simplest kind of storytelling. Michaels was also good at developing spots like that, but the developed spots would be better and the development process would be deeper. The Liger/Sano series was a great one to see really well-developed spots (developed over the series of matches rather than just in one).

Misawa had a spot that was developed over multiple years. Super dangerous move that he hit and then retired. Then, later, in a really tough match, he's pulling out all the stops, but can't get the finish. He makes the apparently difficult decision to go for it again.
 
Yo, what's up with the "anti-:eek::eek::eek::eek:" brigading around here?
Oh, you are super against :eek::eek::eek::eek:phillia and you want everyone to know? You to go out on a limb there, fellas.

I swear they're autistic or just really bad at trolling.
 
Yo, what's up with the "anti-:eek::eek::eek::eek:" brigading around here?
Oh, you are super against :eek::eek::eek::eek:phillia and you want everyone to know? You to go out on a limb there, fellas.

I swear they're autistic or just really bad at trolling.
It's an over-reaction IMO trying to "get one over" after people lost jobs and shit for really shitty racially charged jokes and shit.
 
I'm going to binge watch Trailer Park Boys when I get home
 
Didn't we banish prowrestling discussion to some dark, dingy corner of this forum?
 
Yo, what's up with the "anti-:eek::eek::eek::eek:" brigading around here?
Oh, you are super against :eek::eek::eek::eek:phillia and you want everyone to know? You to go out on a limb there, fellas.

I swear they're autistic or just really bad at trolling.

You're pro-:eek::eek::eek::eek:philia, I see.
 
I guess I don't understand to fun in trolling nonstop.
 
I guess I don't understand to fun in trolling nonstop.
Trolling can be therapeutic and good for the soul. But done in high quantities can lead to loss of sleep and nausea.
 
They can’t all be as bad ass as the acolytes

Untitled-4.gif
 
I guess I don't understand to fun in trolling nonstop.

Trolling way back was almost an art form. Trolls would appear pretty normal, then post something weird that caught everyone's attention. Its hard to really consider these new guys trolls. There's no intelligent content, they just spam and sealion threads.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top