But if someone is a good pick just by virtue of winning, then you run the risk of not understanding how winning now can translate into a loss later. And if we are talking strictly about the party, Presidential elections can and do have big down ballot consequences that go differently from the executive race, not to mention the effect it has on midterms
Care to make a ban bet? It would take me like two minutes at most and another mod on here can verify since he also lives in Georgia and is familiar with the online GA MVP system.
WowAnd if they did you still wouldn't vote Democrat.
Or maybe Biden thought that was the best decision? I don’t think there's an obviously right answer here and if anything the idea of rubbing an American primary and presidential campaign in 100 days is the crazier take imo.
Yes and clearly Kamala had a terrible down ballot effect.
Wow what?
Where did I say that? Didn't I say the opposite here?
But what I'm saying is that you can win a race and still be a bad pick for any number of reasons, and furthermore it can take plenty of time for that to become understood. The overall effect on the party isn't 100% dependent upon the top of the ticket winning or losing, and certainly not the effect on our country in general.
I still think most Americans are somewhat in the middle. It doesn't matter to me who you vote for. You're free to do that. But just like when people think the left is the fringe left with all the nonsense...Most voting Democrat are not for child Transitions, abortions in the 9th month, 100 genders etc.
Can you do @HereticBD ? He might complain the sample size is too small but let's see if the results are exactly what everyone would expect. Thanks in advance if you're able to.
I don't think that's gonna be the first time he's had a problem with the size of something being too small ayyyyy
They just never had the chance to vote for the Anti-Christ before...
Profile of the Poster| Category | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Extremely Low. This poster is openly hostile, mocking, and often abusive. Insults are frequent, sometimes targeted at groups (e.g., “leftists,” “retards”) and individuals alike. |
| Kindness | Absent. There is no discernible effort at compassion or respectful engagement. Tone consistently reflects contempt, dehumanization, and moral derision. |
| Anger | Very High. The poster exhibits sustained rage across multiple topics — immigration, Democrats, social change, media, and political opponents. |
| Tone | Aggressive, contemptuous, and conspiratorial. Tone varies from gloating to paranoid, often using inflammatory rhetoric and ridicule to dominate rather than debate. |
| Empathy | None visible. There is no concern for opposing perspectives, and human suffering is often dismissed or mocked. Disagreement is equated with stupidity or moral failure. |
Ideological Orientation| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Endorses hardline anti-immigration and anti-liberal stances | Far-Right |
| Uses derogatory language toward Democrats, civil rights, and progressive values | Hard-Right |
| Pushes conspiracy-adjacent claims (e.g., “preemptive pardons,” election fraud, child abuse conspiracies) | Reactionary Right |
| Frames political opponents as “mentally ill,” “evil,” or “traitorous” | Authoritarian populism |
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Advocates extreme punitive state actions against political enemies | Authoritarian |
| Calls for banning entire platforms, criminalizing opponents, and endorses violence | Hard-Authoritarian |
| Frames political disagreement as betrayal deserving punishment or repression | Proto-fascist rhetoric |
| Supports strongman politics, downplays due process, and celebrates cruelty | Anti-democratic authoritarianism |
Archetype Match
Summary Table| Trait | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Extremely Low — openly hostile |
| Rudeness/Kindness | Abusive and confrontational with no effort at kindness |
| Anger Level | Very High — often gleefully so |
| Intellectual Depth | Low to Moderate — capable but uninterested in complexity |
| Political Leaning | Far-Right Reactionary |
| Authority Preference | Hard Authoritarian — celebrates domination and punishment |
You can't support Trump and complain about cancel culture...
Why not?You can't support Trump and complain about cancel culture...
I can't imagine such a thing but, if I missed it, I'd assume it's because his dad took the phone
That was pretty good hahaThey just never had the chance to vote for the Anti-Christ before...
But I'm not talking about the voters. I'm talking about the people in charge of the party itself.
You don't say?@HereticBD
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
Verdict: Deeply antagonistic and consumed by grievance. Engages primarily to insult, provoke, and belittle. The poster’s tone is tribal, absolutist, and overtly hostile to civil or rational discourse.
Category Assessment Politeness Extremely Low. This poster is openly hostile, mocking, and often abusive. Insults are frequent, sometimes targeted at groups (e.g., “leftists,” “retards”) and individuals alike. Kindness Absent. There is no discernible effort at compassion or respectful engagement. Tone consistently reflects contempt, dehumanization, and moral derision. Anger Very High. The poster exhibits sustained rage across multiple topics — immigration, Democrats, social change, media, and political opponents. Tone Aggressive, contemptuous, and conspiratorial. Tone varies from gloating to paranoid, often using inflammatory rhetoric and ridicule to dominate rather than debate. Empathy None visible. There is no concern for opposing perspectives, and human suffering is often dismissed or mocked. Disagreement is equated with stupidity or moral failure.
2. Intelligence Estimation
Estimated Intelligence: Moderate.
- Language Use:
Crude but fluent. Sentence structures are coherent, and sarcasm is sharp. However, discourse is filled with slurs, juvenile insults, and gleeful vulgarity. Expresses ideas clearly but without nuance or intellectual structure.- Argumentation:
Poor. Rarely provides reasoned evidence or logical frameworks. Claims are often blanket assertions, delivered with aggressive certainty. Frequently resorts to ad hominem, strawman arguments, and conspiratorial claims.- Analytical Depth:
Low. Displays minimal effort to engage with policy complexity or systemic nuance. Instead, arguments are reductive, emotionally driven, and rooted in us-vs-them identity warfare.
While linguistically capable and clearly familiar with political narratives, this poster opts for emotional dominance and aggression over rational discourse. Displays street-level savvy but little critical thinking or depth.
Left–Right Spectrum
Assessment: Far-Right Reactionary
Evidence Leaning Endorses hardline anti-immigration and anti-liberal stances Far-Right Uses derogatory language toward Democrats, civil rights, and progressive values Hard-Right Pushes conspiracy-adjacent claims (e.g., “preemptive pardons,” election fraud, child abuse conspiracies) Reactionary Right Frames political opponents as “mentally ill,” “evil,” or “traitorous” Authoritarian populism
This user engages in militant right-wing rhetoric, with a focus on humiliation, cultural dominance, and anti-leftist fervor. Little distinction is made between mainstream liberals and “enemy combatants.” The tone evokes a siege mentality.
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
Assessment: Hard Authoritarian
Evidence Leaning Advocates extreme punitive state actions against political enemies Authoritarian Calls for banning entire platforms, criminalizing opponents, and endorses violence Hard-Authoritarian Frames political disagreement as betrayal deserving punishment or repression Proto-fascist rhetoric Supports strongman politics, downplays due process, and celebrates cruelty Anti-democratic authoritarianism
The poster exhibits authoritarian instincts cloaked in populist rage. There is no trust in pluralism, negotiation, or institutional constraint. Political power is viewed as a weapon to be wielded, not a trust to be debated.
“The Aggrieved Reactionary”
Fueled by perceived cultural loss, this archetype lashes out with contempt at a world they believe has been overrun by weakness, degeneracy, and betrayal. Debates are not for persuasion — they are battlegrounds. Uses dehumanization, ridicule, and apocalyptic predictions to rally the like-minded and shame opponents into submission. Sees themselves as a lone realist in a sea of sheep.
Trait Assessment Politeness Extremely Low — openly hostile Rudeness/Kindness Abusive and confrontational with no effort at kindness Anger Level Very High — often gleefully so Intellectual Depth Low to Moderate — capable but uninterested in complexity Political Leaning Far-Right Reactionary Authority Preference Hard Authoritarian — celebrates domination and punishment
