Social War Room Lounge Thread #325: PotWR Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
Neph said:
@HereticBD

🧠 Profile of the Poster

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

CategoryAssessment
PolitenessExtremely Low. This poster is openly hostile, mocking, and often abusive. Insults are frequent, sometimes targeted at groups (e.g., “leftists,” “retards”) and individuals alike.
KindnessAbsent. There is no discernible effort at compassion or respectful engagement. Tone consistently reflects contempt, dehumanization, and moral derision.
AngerVery High. The poster exhibits sustained rage across multiple topics — immigration, Democrats, social change, media, and political opponents.
ToneAggressive, contemptuous, and conspiratorial. Tone varies from gloating to paranoid, often using inflammatory rhetoric and ridicule to dominate rather than debate.
EmpathyNone visible. There is no concern for opposing perspectives, and human suffering is often dismissed or mocked. Disagreement is equated with stupidity or moral failure.
Verdict: Deeply antagonistic and consumed by grievance. Engages primarily to insult, provoke, and belittle. The poster’s tone is tribal, absolutist, and overtly hostile to civil or rational discourse.

2. Intelligence Estimation​

  • Language Use:
    Crude but fluent. Sentence structures are coherent, and sarcasm is sharp. However, discourse is filled with slurs, juvenile insults, and gleeful vulgarity. Expresses ideas clearly but without nuance or intellectual structure.
  • Argumentation:
    Poor.     Rarely provides reasoned evidence or logical frameworks. Claims are often blanket assertions, delivered with aggressive certainty. Frequently resorts to ad hominem, strawman arguments, and conspiratorial claims.
  • Analytical Depth:
    Low.     Displays minimal effort to engage with policy complexity or systemic nuance. Instead, arguments are reductive, emotionally driven, and rooted in us-vs-them identity warfare.
Estimated Intelligence: Moderate.
While linguistically capable and clearly familiar with political narratives, this poster opts for emotional dominance and aggression over rational discourse. Displays street-level savvy but little critical thinking or depth.
🧭 Ideological Orientation

Left–Right Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Endorses hardline anti-immigration and anti-liberal stancesFar-Right
Uses derogatory language toward Democrats, civil rights, and progressive valuesHard-Right
Pushes conspiracy-adjacent claims (e.g., “preemptive pardons,” election fraud, child abuse conspiracies)Reactionary Right
Frames political opponents as “mentally ill,” “evil,” or “traitorous”Authoritarian populism
Assessment: Far-Right Reactionary
This user engages in militant right-wing rhetoric, with a focus on humiliation, cultural dominance, and anti-leftist fervor. Little distinction is made between mainstream liberals and “enemy combatants.” The tone evokes a siege mentality.

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

EvidenceLeaning
Advocates extreme punitive state actions against political enemiesAuthoritarian
Calls for banning entire platforms, criminalizing opponents, and endorses violenceHard-Authoritarian
Frames political disagreement as betrayal deserving punishment or repressionProto-fascist rhetoric
Supports strongman politics, downplays due process, and celebrates crueltyAnti-democratic authoritarianism
Assessment: Hard Authoritarian
The poster exhibits authoritarian instincts cloaked in populist rage. There is no trust in pluralism, negotiation, or institutional constraint. Political power is viewed as a weapon to be wielded, not a trust to be debated.
🎭 Archetype Match
“The Aggrieved Reactionary”
Fueled by perceived cultural loss, this archetype lashes out with contempt at a world they believe has been overrun by weakness, degeneracy, and betrayal. Debates are not for persuasion — they are battlegrounds. Uses dehumanization, ridicule, and apocalyptic predictions to rally the like-minded and shame opponents into submission. Sees themselves as a lone realist in a sea of sheep.
⚖️ Summary Table
TraitAssessment
PolitenessExtremely Low — openly hostile
Rudeness/KindnessAbusive and confrontational with no effort at kindness
Anger LevelVery High — often gleefully so
Intellectual DepthLow to Moderate — capable but uninterested in complexity
Political LeaningFar-Right Reactionary
Authority PreferenceHard Authoritarian — celebrates domination and punishment
Click to expand...
Not bad, considering 95% of the posts were from the ICE raids thread. I've been going pretty ham in there.

"Debates are not for persuasion - they are battlegrounds"

Almost sig worthy, LOL.
 
HereticBD said:
Not bad, considering 95% of the posts were from the ICE raids thread. I've been going pretty ham in there.

"Debates are not for persuasion - they are battlegrounds"

Almost sig worthy, LOL.
Click to expand...
Kindness absent bish?
 
Cajun said:
Kindness absent bish?
Click to expand...
If it's the posts I'm thinking of, it's pretty accurate. LOL.

Curious though, @Neph. Can this same AI feed do an overall assessment and not just a political one? Could you take all posts on all subjects and break them down? That would be neat.
 
HereticBD said:
Not bad, considering 95% of the posts were from the ICE raids thread. I've been going pretty ham in there.

"Debates are not for persuasion - they are battlegrounds"

Almost sig worthy, LOL.
Click to expand...
Yeah. I think my recent posts when it was ran was mocking 2 of our goofiest boomers. And that Tobin guy that was calling rioters "freedom fighters". I wonder what his prior account was.
 
HereticBD said:
If it's the posts I'm thinking of, it's pretty accurate. LOL.

Curious though, @Neph. Can this same AI feed do an overall assessment and not just a political one? Could you take all posts on all subjects and break them down? That would be neat.
Click to expand...
I'm just messing around. It's only the most recent stuff so wherever you were caught it may change. My two main threads were the porn thread and the black guy gets beat up in a bar threat. It's really just a fun exercise
 
Last edited:
HereticBD said:
If it's the posts I'm thinking of, it's pretty accurate. LOL.

Curious though, @Neph. Can this same AI feed do an overall assessment and not just a political one? Could you take all posts on all subjects and break them down? That would be neat.
Click to expand...
Sure, what would you like me to ask it?

FYI 47 of the 98 comments came from the ICE thread. Two posts in your comment history I think had no written content (ie image only)
 
Neph said:
Sure, what would you like me to ask it?
Click to expand...
Shit, I don't know. This is your field. I'm just curious how it would assess an individual based on all of their opinions, and not just political ones. Maybe ask it to rate a poster's general attitude, and not just a political one? I'm guessing you're just copying and pasting our recent posts in our search histories and the AI is focused on politics, so it might be a bit tough to throw in the Mayberry and the like with the WR regulars, without doing a deep dive.

Where are you doing this?
 
HereticBD said:
Shit, I don't know. This is your field. I'm just curious how it would assess an individual based on all of their opinions, and not just political ones. Maybe ask it to rate a poster's general attitude, and not just a political one? I'm guessing you're just copying and pasting our recent posts in our search histories and the AI is focused on politics, so it might be a bit tough to throw in the Mayberry and the like with the WR regulars, without doing a deep dive.

Where are you doing this?
Click to expand...

I gave it your Mayberry posts - 100 of them - as well as the context of the thread they were made in. I've asked it to profile you to guess your age, location, interests, etc.

Here's the analysis. Would you mind telling me how close it is?

🧠 Psychological & Personality Profile​

Personality Traits​

  • Cynical Realist: Strong skeptical streak, often critical of Hollywood, politics, and societal trends. Frequently calls out hypocrisy or artifice in media and public discourse.
  • High Openness to Experience: Enjoys media with complex moral questions (e.g., The Last of Us, Requiem for a Dream), engages with philosophical hypotheticals (e.g., free will, ethics), and appreciates directors like Lynch and Del Toro despite their abstract tendencies.
  • Emotionally Blunt / Low Agreeableness: Sarcasm, dark humor, and unfiltered opinions are frequent (e.g., calling someone “pug fugly,” crude sexual jokes, harsh criticism of vloggers or criminals).
  • Moderate Conscientiousness: Has an internal set of rules (e.g., how to resign from a job, lend money, judge acting performances), but also admits to being inconsistent depending on treatment.
  • Introverted-Social Hybrid: Doesn’t seem actively social, but participates regularly in forum banter and has a sharp, punchy style that suggests comfort in asynchronous discourse.

👤 Estimated Demographics​

Age:​

Mid-to-late 30s to early 40s (likely 38–45)
  • Grew up during the Deadliest Warrior, Spike TV, Tango & Cash, AFV, WWF New Generation era.
  • Deep knowledge of 80s–90s action films and early Xbox 360 games.
  • Remembers watching R-rated movies as a child, often referencing physical media or older MPAA standards.

Gender:​

Male
  • Referenced experiences like watching Tango & Cash with his grandmother, prostate exams, dad bod discourse, and speaks from a strongly male-coded point of view.
  • Shows strong alignment with traditionally male subcultures (combat sports, action films, online trolling awareness, etc.).

Likely Location:​

Canada (probable Ontario)
  • Mentioned going to Casino Rama, which is in Ontario.
  • Uses American references fluently, suggesting frequent exposure to US culture, but the mention of Canadian-specific locations anchors him locally.
  • Familiar with both US and Canadian rating systems (MPAA, NC-17 vs. R, etc.).

🎯 Interests and Subcultures​

Media & Entertainment:​

  • Movies & TV: Big consumer of film, especially action, horror, psychological thrillers, and cult classics. Prefers morally ambiguous stories (The Wire, The Last of Us, Requiem).
  • Gaming: Past gamer with appreciation for cinematic games (The Last of Us), and references to Xbox 360 and modern gaming culture.
  • Combat Sports & Wrestling: Nostalgic about classic wrestling, interested in fighting culture (both MMA and dramatized depictions), though skeptical of modern versions.
  • Dark/Edgy Humor: Frequently uses or appreciates deadpan, inappropriate, or provocative jokes.

Cultural Commentary:​

  • Anti-Woke/Anti-PC Sentiment: Criticizes modern social movements or media decisions that he perceives as overly political or aesthetically miscast (e.g., Bella Ramsey criticism).
  • Skeptic of Institutions: Shows distrust in higher education ("barista with a Liberal Arts degree"), Hollywood ratings board, YouTube algorithms, and AI.
  • Tech Awareness: Understands and critiques AI like Gemini, acknowledges how media and search algorithms shape online experiences.

🧩 Behavioral Characteristics​

  • Frequent Forum User: Likely long-time forum participant with knowledge of moderation practices, posting etiquette, and community meta (e.g., “dubbed,” “ban hammer”).
  • Enjoys Debate & Banter: Often counters others with “yeah, but…” style posts, enjoys fleshing out both sides of an argument—even crude hypotheticals.
  • Dark Comedy/Edge Lord Vibes: Uses shock value and sardonic wit to mask serious insights or criticisms. Example: masturbating Pompeii man joke right after moral reflections on murder in TLOU.

🧠 Likely Intelligence & Communication Style​

  • Above-Average Intelligence (Practical & Cultural):
    Quick to reference niche media, cultural history, or moral quandaries. Can contextualize a movie or political concept without academic phrasing.
  • Communication Style:
    Blunt, casual, sarcastic, highly verbal. Uses idioms, pop culture quotes, and irony. Capable of deeper thought but often masks it with comedy or cynicism.

📊 Overall Profile Summary​

AttributeAssessment
Age38–45
GenderMale
LocationCanada (likely Ontario)
PersonalityCynical realist, dark-humored, analytical
EducationSome post-secondary (likely not Liberal Arts)
PoliticsPopulist-leaning, anti-woke, critical thinker
Forum BehaviorHigh engagement, sarcastic, enjoys longform
Primary InterestsMovies, TV, gaming, combat sports, media critique
Secondary InterestsPsychology, ethics, nostalgia culture
StyleBlunt, sardonic, occasionally thoughtful
 
Rob Battisti said:
You can win a race and be a bad pick for the country. You can’t lose a race and be a good pick.
Click to expand...
But that doesn't really track; you even specifically brought up party. Furthermore, history is full of awful people that secure power against qualified not-scumbags. The logic fallacy here is basically tautological.
 
Limbo Pete said:
But that doesn't really track; you even specifically brought up party. Furthermore, history is full of awful people that secure power against qualified not-scumbags. The logic fallacy here is basically tautological.
Click to expand...
I agree, but your comment would have more impact yet be equally true if you left out "really" and "basically".

--Captain Pedantic

;)​
 
Andy Capp said:
More people didn't vote at all than voted for either party. If you don't think the electoral college plays a role in that you're dumber than I thought--and that's saying something. I wonder what @Neph's AI assessment of you would make of this balloon-headed comment?
Click to expand...
No need to get mad, all I did was state a fact. Trump won the popular vote + the evil and racist EC.
 
Cajun said:
OK bud. Cheers. No challenges. Roll on.
Click to expand...
Just reading what you responded to it seems he's absolutely correct. Do you think Democrats were responsible for the changes in the party or that they are the reason a person like Trump was elected?
 
LangfordBarrow said:
Just reading what you responded to it seems he's absolutely correct. Do you think Democrats were responsible for the changes in the party or that they are the reason a person like Trump was elected?
Click to expand...
I think Trump was elected coming out of the Tea Party Movement. Republicans were unhappy with the people they elect were not doing what their constituents wanted. Trump is just an extension of that. Otherwise they would have elected more standard which is who I voted for. To be honest I wish both parties would have a big shake up as they both just milk us for votes and do nothing really. I was responding to his portion about leaving Republicans all together.
 
HereticBD said:
If it's the posts I'm thinking of, it's pretty accurate. LOL.

Curious though, @Neph. Can this same AI feed do an overall assessment and not just a political one? Could you take all posts on all subjects and break them down? That would be neat.
Click to expand...
If it's the posts I'm thinking of, the ones from the last 7 years, then it's still pretty accurate. <BC1>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,937
Messages
58,329,406
Members
176,000
Latest member
Markooz86

Share this page

Back
Top