Which means they weren't the best pick. Be honest though, do you think Democrats are making the "best" picks, based on the last three election cycles? Even their winner, who was voted in on past perceptions, became an unholy albatross to the party that they won't recover from for some time.
It would probably be easier to get synopses for posts from each forum.
It's hard to be mad at the mentally incompetent.
I think this is a pretty good representation of how discussing politics or religion can bring out the worst in us. I recently had @Seano and another poster claim I wasn't as big an asshole in the boxing and mayberry forums and they were probably right.I gave it your Mayberry posts - 100 of them - as well as the context of the thread they were made in. I've asked it to profile you to guess your age, location, interests, etc.
Here's the analysis. Would you mind telling me how close it is?
Psychological & Personality Profile
Personality Traits
- Cynical Realist: Strong skeptical streak, often critical of Hollywood, politics, and societal trends. Frequently calls out hypocrisy or artifice in media and public discourse.
- High Openness to Experience: Enjoys media with complex moral questions (e.g., The Last of Us, Requiem for a Dream), engages with philosophical hypotheticals (e.g., free will, ethics), and appreciates directors like Lynch and Del Toro despite their abstract tendencies.
- Emotionally Blunt / Low Agreeableness: Sarcasm, dark humor, and unfiltered opinions are frequent (e.g., calling someone “pug fugly,” crude sexual jokes, harsh criticism of vloggers or criminals).
- Moderate Conscientiousness: Has an internal set of rules (e.g., how to resign from a job, lend money, judge acting performances), but also admits to being inconsistent depending on treatment.
- Introverted-Social Hybrid: Doesn’t seem actively social, but participates regularly in forum banter and has a sharp, punchy style that suggests comfort in asynchronous discourse.
Estimated Demographics
Age:
Mid-to-late 30s to early 40s (likely 38–45)
- Grew up during the Deadliest Warrior, Spike TV, Tango & Cash, AFV, WWF New Generation era.
- Deep knowledge of 80s–90s action films and early Xbox 360 games.
- Remembers watching R-rated movies as a child, often referencing physical media or older MPAA standards.
Gender:
Male
- Referenced experiences like watching Tango & Cash with his grandmother, prostate exams, dad bod discourse, and speaks from a strongly male-coded point of view.
- Shows strong alignment with traditionally male subcultures (combat sports, action films, online trolling awareness, etc.).
Likely Location:
Canada (probable Ontario)
- Mentioned going to Casino Rama, which is in Ontario.
- Uses American references fluently, suggesting frequent exposure to US culture, but the mention of Canadian-specific locations anchors him locally.
- Familiar with both US and Canadian rating systems (MPAA, NC-17 vs. R, etc.).
Interests and Subcultures
Media & Entertainment:
- Movies & TV: Big consumer of film, especially action, horror, psychological thrillers, and cult classics. Prefers morally ambiguous stories (The Wire, The Last of Us, Requiem).
- Gaming: Past gamer with appreciation for cinematic games (The Last of Us), and references to Xbox 360 and modern gaming culture.
- Combat Sports & Wrestling: Nostalgic about classic wrestling, interested in fighting culture (both MMA and dramatized depictions), though skeptical of modern versions.
- Dark/Edgy Humor: Frequently uses or appreciates deadpan, inappropriate, or provocative jokes.
Cultural Commentary:
- Anti-Woke/Anti-PC Sentiment: Criticizes modern social movements or media decisions that he perceives as overly political or aesthetically miscast (e.g., Bella Ramsey criticism).
- Skeptic of Institutions: Shows distrust in higher education ("barista with a Liberal Arts degree"), Hollywood ratings board, YouTube algorithms, and AI.
- Tech Awareness: Understands and critiques AI like Gemini, acknowledges how media and search algorithms shape online experiences.
Behavioral Characteristics
- Frequent Forum User: Likely long-time forum participant with knowledge of moderation practices, posting etiquette, and community meta (e.g., “dubbed,” “ban hammer”).
- Enjoys Debate & Banter: Often counters others with “yeah, but…” style posts, enjoys fleshing out both sides of an argument—even crude hypotheticals.
- Dark Comedy/Edge Lord Vibes: Uses shock value and sardonic wit to mask serious insights or criticisms. Example: masturbating Pompeii man joke right after moral reflections on murder in TLOU.
- Above-Average Intelligence (Practical & Cultural):
Quick to reference niche media, cultural history, or moral quandaries. Can contextualize a movie or political concept without academic phrasing.- Communication Style:
Blunt, casual, sarcastic, highly verbal. Uses idioms, pop culture quotes, and irony. Capable of deeper thought but often masks it with comedy or cynicism.
Overall Profile Summary
Attribute Assessment Age 38–45 Gender Male Location Canada (likely Ontario) Personality Cynical realist, dark-humored, analytical Education Some post-secondary (likely not Liberal Arts) Politics Populist-leaning, anti-woke, critical thinker Forum Behavior High engagement, sarcastic, enjoys longform Primary Interests Movies, TV, gaming, combat sports, media critique Secondary Interests Psychology, ethics, nostalgia culture Style Blunt, sardonic, occasionally thoughtful
Too easy...
I do think Biden was the best choice to beat Trump in the '20 election, which is why he was attacked with the Ashley diary/Hunter laptop and foreign agent allegations of corruption scandals, but he should have made it clear from the start that he wouldn't run for reelection.
Telling someone to commit suicide on a karate forum = bigly mad.
She’s too Pro Israel to be perceived a member of the squad…
Laish inta meesh lateef? Khush fateezi ya khanzeer
Welcome to Cajuns " centrist" world...
Being accused of being an asshole by him is like a pile of shit telling you your arse stinks.
Morning
The snowflake put me on ignore for rebutting a series of his posts. It's a discussion forum but the guy must think he's something special and is just posting for posterity. Instead of debating he seems to consider dissent as a personal attack with no substance.
Because that's how he approaches it and he assumes everyone else is the same.
Lots of peeps in that category. Dont know why anyone uses the ignore or report button tho.
I feel like online can be similar to real life as long as they arent trolling. When you discuss politics or religion peeps either handle it well or not. Some friends I know I can't have the discussion while others I can. Some are just too emotional and it goes off the rails. Here because its anonymous its easier to engage but the same result.
