Social War Room Lounge Thread #325: PotWR Edition

[Rob Battisti]

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Moderate. Occasionally sharp or dismissive, but often engages respectfully, especially when debating facts or predictions.
Kindness	Selective. Shows moments of decency and even warmth (e.g., respectful debate, gratitude toward other users). Insults are rare and usually mild.
Anger	Low-to-moderate. Frustrated by misinformation or poor arguments, but rarely lashes out. Most emotion is directed at public figures (e.g., Trump, sleazy politicians) or inaccurate claims.
Tone	Rational, data-driven, occasionally sarcastic, but mostly composed. Some humor, a little bitterness, and clear emotional investment in fairness and truth.
Empathy	Present, especially in medical discussions (e.g., prostate cancer), social justice issues (e.g., child sacrifice metaphor), and workplace automation concerns.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Fluent, analytical, and numerically competent. Regularly references data sources (Forbes, Bloomberg, stock metrics). Uses economic, technological, and political terminology correctly.
• Argumentation: Highly structured. Frequently corrects factual inaccuracies, rebuts claims with specific data, and explains long-term investment theses (e.g., TSLA to $2000 via M2/inflation). Challenges ideological opponents with verifiable numbers.
• Analytical Depth: High. Shows understanding of finance, AI impacts on labor, political dynamics, and historical trends. Offers thoughtful predictions, not just opinions.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Criticizes Trump, calls him sleazy and corrupt	Left-leaning
Supports Elon Musk’s ventures and strongly defends Tesla’s innovation and valuation	Tech-optimist right tendencies
Voices frustration with California liberals but calls out misinformation from both political sides	Centrist-populist streak
Concerned about income inequality, automation, and political dishonesty	Economically left, socially moderate

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Favors individual action (e.g., career decisions, financial independence, personal healthcare choices)	Libertarian-leaning
Skeptical of government inefficiency but not opposed to regulation or oversight	Libertarian-centrist
Dislikes propaganda and emotionally manipulative media across the spectrum	Anti-authoritarian

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Moderate and discussion-oriented
Rudeness/Kindness	Occasionally curt but not mean-spirited
Anger Level	Low; more exasperated than furious
Intellectual Depth	Very high – analytic and data-literate
Political Leaning	Center-left with tech-optimist flexibility
Authority Preference	Mildly Libertarian

Thank you!

@Jack V Savage would be punching air if he were here reading this and not having his “Rob is a Republican talking head” narrative supported.

 

[Neph]

@nonoob

There were less posts for you; you had posted a bit in other forums and I restrict it War Room only. Not sure if this is accurate or not:

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Very low. Tone is hostile, mocking, conspiratorial, and frequently vulgar.
Kindness	Minimal. Occasionally expresses appreciation toward allies, but mostly communicates in ridicule and resentment.
Anger	High. Anger is sustained, directed at political figures, minority groups, media, and institutions.
Tone	Paranoid, inflammatory, unfiltered. Mixes satire, exaggeration, and crude humor.
Empathy	Extremely low. Uses dehumanizing language for political enemies and vulnerable groups (e.g., immigrants, trans people, protestors).

Verdict: This poster is heavily emotionally invested, communicates through insult and conspiracism, and exhibits significant hostility toward perceived political and cultural opponents. Style is combative, chaotic, and distrustful.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Informal and grammatically inconsistent, often rant-like. Misuses punctuation, capitalization, and syntax. Makes heavy use of slang, acronyms, and sarcastic formatting ("Buyden," "MSM," "hoax LP").
• Argumentation: Largely absent. Most posts assert opinions without evidence, rely on insinuation, or repeat conspiratorial tropes (e.g., "crisis actors," "depopulation," "cannibalism at elite tables").
• Analytical Depth: Very low. Does not engage with evidence-based reasoning. When discussing policies or events, logic is overwhelmed by inflammatory rhetoric.

Estimated Intelligence: Below average expression
While the poster may possess functional intelligence in other areas, their rhetorical style is chaotic, emotionally charged, and conspiratorially driven, lacking clarity or substance.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Extreme hostility toward liberal politicians, immigrants, LGBT+ people, and the media	Far Right
Repetition of culture war memes (e.g., "Buyden," “dindu,” “peaceful riots,” “white supremacist hoax”)	Reactionary/Alt-right
Support for martial law, National Guard deployment, incarceration of elected officials	Far-right authoritarian
Transphobic, misogynistic, and racialized commentary	Far-right identity politics

Assessment: Far Right / Reactionary
Displays extreme right-wing populism with conspiratorial and xenophobic elements. Deeply hostile to progressive values and skeptical of democratic institutions.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Advocates martial law, federal intervention, and jailing political opponents	Strong authoritarian
Believes media and elites are engaged in widespread coverups and hoaxes	Anti-establishment, but pro-coercion
Little interest in individual liberty unless framed as opposition to "the left"	Anti-libertarian

Assessment: Strongly Authoritarian
Prioritizes order, punishment, and perceived justice over due process or rights. Highly distrustful of civil institutions unless they support preferred ideology.

---

Archetype Match​

“The Conspiratorial Crusader”
Fueled by anger, disillusionment, and fringe narratives, this poster sees themselves as a truth-teller in a corrupt world. Their communication style is abrasive, conspiratorial, and prone to exaggeration. Deeply entrenched in identity politics, they seek harsh solutions and reject empathy toward “the other.”

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Very low – openly hostile
Rudeness/Kindness	Aggressive, crude, and mocking
Anger Level	Very high – directed toward systemic and social groups
Intellectual Depth	Low – conspiracy and hyperbole dominate
Political Leaning	Far Right / Reactionary
Authority Preference	Strongly Authoritarian

 

[nonoob]

Thank you (I think, lol) Neph.
Knowingly left myself open to being slammed, whatever.
Here & elsewhere have always called $hit as I see it.
Sarcatic humor helps me deal with $hit that pisses me off...
knowing there's nothing that can likely be done to change it.

​

 

[Limbo Pete]

Thank you (I think, lol) Neph.
Knowingly left myself open to being slammed, whatever.
Here & elsewhere have always called $hit as I see it.
Sarcatic humor helps me deal with $hit that pisses me off...
knowing there's nothing that can likely be done to change it.

​

For what it's worth dude, I wouldn't put too much stock in this stuff lol it's basically the present day equivalent to a MySpace personality quiz
Fun though

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

I killed(his online self) him. He lost a bet against me and never came back.

@Neph how do you run that analysis?

Legend

 

[nonoob]

For what it's worth dude, I wouldn't put too much stock in this stuff lol it's basically the present day equivalent to a MySpace personality quiz
Fun though

Thanks LP,
Interesting stuff for sure.

 

[Hog-train]

@Neph Can you do me?

That sounded gay.

 

[Neph]

@Neph Can you do me?

That sounded gay.

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low. Tone is combative, sarcastic, and often dismissive, though not as personally abusive as others.
Kindness	Infrequent. Shows some empathy for working-class citizens and criticism of social systems, but also expresses hostility toward migrants, trans people, and activists.
Anger	Moderate to high. The poster exhibits exasperation, moral frustration, and indignation — often toward systemic issues or media narratives.
Tone	Confrontational, hyper-verbal, confident. Switches between aggressive, technical, and sardonic. Strong belief in being “the rational one.”
Empathy	Selective. Expresses sympathy toward legal residents, working-class citizens, and abuse victims — but often ridicules activists, trans individuals, and liberal narratives.

Verdict: Blunt and argumentative. This poster sees themselves as a rationalist, fighting misinformation with "facts" — but regularly veers into antagonism, tribalism, and righteous indignation.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: High-volume, confident, and data-loaded. Sometimes inflammatory, but posts are mostly coherent, detailed, and well-structured.
• Argumentation: Heavy reliance on factual rebuttals, legal interpretations, and source citation. Frequently challenges others to prove claims. Strong understanding of immigration law, sports regulations, and media reporting.
• Analytical Depth: Very high in some domains (e.g. gender testing protocols, immigration law), though often merges factual argument with bias. Shows deep investment in being “right.”

Estimated Intelligence: High
Poster demonstrates a strong grasp of policy, legal frameworks, and argumentation — though bias sometimes compromises the neutrality of their logic.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Aggressively critical of immigration policy, trans rights, and left-wing identity politics	Right-leaning
Critical of Trump and skeptical of corporations like Tesla/SpaceX	Not fully aligned with MAGA/traditional GOP
Socially conservative but occasionally empathetic to legal due process, working class, or guests	Right-libertarian or populist right
Deeply critical of mainstream media, identity ideology, and gender policy	Culture war conservative

Assessment: Center-right to Culture-War Conservative
Policy-driven and detail-focused, but strongly antagonistic toward progressive social causes and liberal media narratives.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Strong emphasis on enforcing law (deportations, school authority boundaries, criminal behavior)	Authoritarian leaning
Defends individual parental rights, legal due process, and critiques overreach	Libertarian elements
Wants strong, decisive government enforcement on immigration and public behavior	Authoritarian in function, libertarian in rhetoric

Assessment: Authoritarian-Leaning Libertarian
Supports firm boundaries and state enforcement, but bases it on lawfulness and fairness rather than blind loyalty.

---

Archetype Match​

“The Legalist Culture Warrior”
A combative and confident poster who brings data and law into emotionally charged social debates. Often opposes leftist ideologies on cultural grounds, but prides themselves on being rule-based and logical. Argumentative, highly engaged, and steeped in policy detail.

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low — sharp and combative
Rudeness/Kindness	Argumentative, but not cruel
Anger Level	High — toward perceived media bias and social chaos
Intellectual Depth	High — policy-literate, law-aware
Political Leaning	Right-leaning / Anti-woke
Authority Preference	Mixed — Legalist-authoritarian with some libertarian tendencies

 

[ShadowRun]

I killed(his online self) him. He lost a bet against me and never came back.

@Neph how do you run that analysis?

You slayed that troll, lol. I would be willing to bet he’s lurking on another account or something.

 

[Hog-train]

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low. Tone is combative, sarcastic, and often dismissive, though not as personally abusive as others.
Kindness	Infrequent. Shows some empathy for working-class citizens and criticism of social systems, but also expresses hostility toward migrants, trans people, and activists.
Anger	Moderate to high. The poster exhibits exasperation, moral frustration, and indignation — often toward systemic issues or media narratives.
Tone	Confrontational, hyper-verbal, confident. Switches between aggressive, technical, and sardonic. Strong belief in being “the rational one.”
Empathy	Selective. Expresses sympathy toward legal residents, working-class citizens, and abuse victims — but often ridicules activists, trans individuals, and liberal narratives.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: High-volume, confident, and data-loaded. Sometimes inflammatory, but posts are mostly coherent, detailed, and well-structured.
• Argumentation: Heavy reliance on factual rebuttals, legal interpretations, and source citation. Frequently challenges others to prove claims. Strong understanding of immigration law, sports regulations, and media reporting.
• Analytical Depth: Very high in some domains (e.g. gender testing protocols, immigration law), though often merges factual argument with bias. Shows deep investment in being “right.”

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Aggressively critical of immigration policy, trans rights, and left-wing identity politics	Right-leaning
Critical of Trump and skeptical of corporations like Tesla/SpaceX	Not fully aligned with MAGA/traditional GOP
Socially conservative but occasionally empathetic to legal due process, working class, or guests	Right-libertarian or populist right
Deeply critical of mainstream media, identity ideology, and gender policy	Culture war conservative

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Strong emphasis on enforcing law (deportations, school authority boundaries, criminal behavior)	Authoritarian leaning
Defends individual parental rights, legal due process, and critiques overreach	Libertarian elements
Wants strong, decisive government enforcement on immigration and public behavior	Authoritarian in function, libertarian in rhetoric

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low — sharp and combative
Rudeness/Kindness	Argumentative, but not cruel
Anger Level	High — toward perceived media bias and social chaos
Intellectual Depth	High — policy-literate, law-aware
Political Leaning	Right-leaning / Anti-woke
Authority Preference	Mixed — Legalist-authoritarian with some libertarian tendencies

Holy crap- kinda crazy how some of the stuff is pretty accurate.

 

[Koya]

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low. Tone is combative, sarcastic, and often dismissive, though not as personally abusive as others.
Kindness	Infrequent. Shows some empathy for working-class citizens and criticism of social systems, but also expresses hostility toward migrants, trans people, and activists.
Anger	Moderate to high. The poster exhibits exasperation, moral frustration, and indignation — often toward systemic issues or media narratives.
Tone	Confrontational, hyper-verbal, confident. Switches between aggressive, technical, and sardonic. Strong belief in being “the rational one.”
Empathy	Selective. Expresses sympathy toward legal residents, working-class citizens, and abuse victims — but often ridicules activists, trans individuals, and liberal narratives.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: High-volume, confident, and data-loaded. Sometimes inflammatory, but posts are mostly coherent, detailed, and well-structured.
• Argumentation: Heavy reliance on factual rebuttals, legal interpretations, and source citation. Frequently challenges others to prove claims. Strong understanding of immigration law, sports regulations, and media reporting.
• Analytical Depth: Very high in some domains (e.g. gender testing protocols, immigration law), though often merges factual argument with bias. Shows deep investment in being “right.”

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Aggressively critical of immigration policy, trans rights, and left-wing identity politics	Right-leaning
Critical of Trump and skeptical of corporations like Tesla/SpaceX	Not fully aligned with MAGA/traditional GOP
Socially conservative but occasionally empathetic to legal due process, working class, or guests	Right-libertarian or populist right
Deeply critical of mainstream media, identity ideology, and gender policy	Culture war conservative

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Strong emphasis on enforcing law (deportations, school authority boundaries, criminal behavior)	Authoritarian leaning
Defends individual parental rights, legal due process, and critiques overreach	Libertarian elements
Wants strong, decisive government enforcement on immigration and public behavior	Authoritarian in function, libertarian in rhetoric

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low — sharp and combative
Rudeness/Kindness	Argumentative, but not cruel
Anger Level	High — toward perceived media bias and social chaos
Intellectual Depth	High — policy-literate, law-aware
Political Leaning	Right-leaning / Anti-woke
Authority Preference	Mixed — Legalist-authoritarian with some libertarian tendencies

Can you have a go at me please ?

 

[Rob Battisti]

Holy crap- kinda crazy how some of the stuff is pretty accurate.

I was hoping it would call me centrist so I could have a good laugh with @Islam Imamate instead it called me center left. Which Is probably correct.

 

[Neph]

Can you have a go at me please ?

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Mixed. Often civil and thoughtful in economic or interpersonal discussions, but extremely hostile and sarcastic in political threads, especially about Israel.
Kindness	Selective. Shows openness in personal conversations and some respectful disagreement. Deep compassion for Palestinian civilians. Harsh and dehumanizing language used for political opponents (especially Israeli settlers and right-wing apologists).
Anger	High. Righteous anger dominates political posts. Uses sardonic humor and outrage when describing perceived injustice.
Tone	Oscillates between sincere, ironic, and emotionally charged. Open to dialogue in non-geopolitical topics.
Empathy	Strong — but targeted. Poster feels deeply for those they view as oppressed or suffering but shows open hostility toward those seen as aggressors or apologists.

Verdict: Passionate, informed, and emotionally driven. While capable of calm debate, especially on social dynamics or economics, they exhibit deep-seated fury over Israeli actions in Palestine and do not shy away from morally charged language.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Clear, expressive, sometimes poetic. Shows solid grasp of complex geopolitical history and economic systems.
• Argumentation: Capable of nuance in non-trigger topics. In the Israeli–Palestinian context, argues forcefully with repeated evidence and moral framing, though occasionally hyperbolic.
• Analytical Depth: Strong. Shows good awareness of power dynamics, historical cycles, and international relations. Capable of introspection and recognizes nuance — especially in interpersonal and societal gender issues.

Estimated Intelligence: High
The poster thinks critically, questions dominant narratives, and applies logic even when impassioned. Their emotional tone doesn’t diminish their analytic ability.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Consistently critical of Israel’s military actions and settler policies	Left
Advocates universal taxation with strong social support (education, healthcare)	Progressive left
Expresses disillusionment with modern feminism and online dating norms — possible trad-leaning bias	Center-left on social issues, skeptical of neoliberal feminism
Questions government overreach, censorship, surveillance society	Libertarian-inflected left

Assessment: Left-wing, especially anti-imperialist and social democratic. Has some culturally conservative observations about gender roles, but overall worldview is rooted in equity and international justice.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Strong emphasis on human rights, anti-militarism, anti-censorship	Libertarian-leaning
Advocates for fair taxation, state healthcare, and justice-based policy	Moderate authority in social contract, but opposes state violence and suppression
Expresses concern over mass surveillance, biometric tracking, and social control	Libertarian-oriented on civil liberties

Assessment: Libertarian-leaning Leftist
Wants state support where needed (e.g., education, healthcare) but rejects authoritarian overreach and imperialist policies.

---

Archetype Match​

“The Disillusioned Idealist”
A thoughtful and articulate poster whose righteous anger is driven by empathy and principles. Disillusioned with liberal hypocrisy and centrist evasiveness, especially in foreign policy. Believes in equity, dignity, and truth — even when the truth is ugly. Feels the system is rigged by the powerful and that moral clarity demands speaking out.

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Mixed — civil in debate, biting in outrage
Kindness	Yes, selectively
Anger Level	High — moral outrage
Intellectual Depth	High — philosophical and geopolitical literacy
Political Leaning	Leftist, anti-imperialist, socially progressive
Authority Preference	Libertarian-leaning with structured ideals

 

[Neph]

Holy crap- kinda crazy how some of the stuff is pretty accurate.

I was hoping it would call me centrist so I could have a good laugh with @Islam Imamate instead it called me center left. Which Is probably correct.

Imagine if you fed AI more than just 100 or so posts from an internet forum. This is just a tiny, tiny window it is looking into...

 

[Koya]

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Mixed. Often civil and thoughtful in economic or interpersonal discussions, but extremely hostile and sarcastic in political threads, especially about Israel.
Kindness	Selective. Shows openness in personal conversations and some respectful disagreement. Deep compassion for Palestinian civilians. Harsh and dehumanizing language used for political opponents (especially Israeli settlers and right-wing apologists).
Anger	High. Righteous anger dominates political posts. Uses sardonic humor and outrage when describing perceived injustice.
Tone	Oscillates between sincere, ironic, and emotionally charged. Open to dialogue in non-geopolitical topics.
Empathy	Strong — but targeted. Poster feels deeply for those they view as oppressed or suffering but shows open hostility toward those seen as aggressors or apologists.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Clear, expressive, sometimes poetic. Shows solid grasp of complex geopolitical history and economic systems.
• Argumentation: Capable of nuance in non-trigger topics. In the Israeli–Palestinian context, argues forcefully with repeated evidence and moral framing, though occasionally hyperbolic.
• Analytical Depth: Strong. Shows good awareness of power dynamics, historical cycles, and international relations. Capable of introspection and recognizes nuance — especially in interpersonal and societal gender issues.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Consistently critical of Israel’s military actions and settler policies	Left
Advocates universal taxation with strong social support (education, healthcare)	Progressive left
Expresses disillusionment with modern feminism and online dating norms — possible trad-leaning bias	Center-left on social issues, skeptical of neoliberal feminism
Questions government overreach, censorship, surveillance society	Libertarian-inflected left

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Strong emphasis on human rights, anti-militarism, anti-censorship	Libertarian-leaning
Advocates for fair taxation, state healthcare, and justice-based policy	Moderate authority in social contract, but opposes state violence and suppression
Expresses concern over mass surveillance, biometric tracking, and social control	Libertarian-oriented on civil liberties

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Mixed — civil in debate, biting in outrage
Kindness	Yes, selectively
Anger Level	High — moral outrage
Intellectual Depth	High — philosophical and geopolitical literacy
Political Leaning	Leftist, anti-imperialist, socially progressive
Authority Preference	Libertarian-leaning with structured ideals

Thanks broski !

 

[Siver!]

Hey @Neph can you run me over with you AI mobile please?

 

[Islam Imamate]

I was hoping it would call me centrist so I could have a good laugh with @Islam Imamate instead it called me center left. Which Is probably correct.

I think that's not correct at all but alright.

 

[Rob Battisti]

I think that's not correct at all but alright.

Don’t argue with our AI overlords

 

[Mr Holmes]

@Neph
Pls do me.

 

[deviake]

Thank you!

@Jack V Savage would be punching air if he were here reading this and not having his “Rob is a Republican talking head” narrative supported.

You should get a medal for cleansing this forum of his presence. Lol