- Joined
- Mar 18, 2014
- Messages
- 20,345
- Reaction score
- 13,692
We would have kicked him out of Louisiana. I believe Theo Vaughn is from around Slidell.
Social War Room Lounge Thread #325: PotWR Edition
- Thread starter Andy Capp
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 37,171
- Reaction score
- 61,344
Currently at a Buc-ees — it’s bathroom heaven at this place.
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2014
- Messages
- 20,345
- Reaction score
- 13,692
Peeps that dont have them dont realize how great a gas station can be.
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 37,171
- Reaction score
- 61,344
The European mind cannot comprehend Buc-ees
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2014
- Messages
- 20,345
- Reaction score
- 13,692
Even the American mind if you're not in Texas brother. But yeah the European mind the Central or South American mind any other country's mind is blown if they go into a Buc-ee's that is a gas station with over 100 pumps and over 50,000 sqft LOL
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 37,171
- Reaction score
- 61,344
On the trip up from Texas to New Jersey. Second in twelve hours so far. This one in Tennessee. It’s awesome. I have one just 40 minutes from my house. It’s everything America should be.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,992
- Reaction score
- 3,903
So that I don't clog up the initial thread, I'm moving AI Sentiment Analysis here. If you want your recent War Room post history reviewed by ChatGPT, I can provide. If there's a lot of requests I may take my time going through them.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,992
- Reaction score
- 3,903
@Koro_11 's result
Profile of the Poster
1. Sentiment Analysis
- Tone: Aggressive, confrontational, sarcastic
- Emotion: Anger, contempt, disdain are dominant.
- Politeness: Very low. Language is crude, dismissive, and often hostile.
- Kindness vs Rudeness: Strongly rude and antagonistic; insults are direct and frequent. The poster displays:
- Personal attacks: “clown,” “emo cuck,” “dishonest rat”
- Profanity: “shut the fuck up,” “fucking high school girl,” “bitch”
- Mocking tone: frequent ridicule of others’ viewpoints
2. Intelligence (Estimated via Language & Reasoning)
- Style: The poster demonstrates familiarity with political topics (e.g., immigration policy, blasphemy laws, Middle Eastern conflicts, US foreign aid, etc.).
- Vocabulary: Informal and profanity-laced, but coherent. Points are sometimes structured with cause-effect logic or rhetorical questions.
- Critical Thinking: There is a clear ideological filter, but some posts suggest a basic-to-moderate grasp of nuanced issues (e.g., distinction between legal/illegal immigration, blasphemy laws applied unequally).
- Estimated Range: Average to slightly above average intelligence, hindered in expression by emotionally charged delivery and lack of self-moderation.
Political Ideological Orientation
1. Left–Right Spectrum:
- Strongly Right-wing
- Anti-“woke” sentiment (references to “LGBT garbage,” “indoctrination”)
- Opposition to illegal immigration
- Support for law enforcement use of force
- Dismissive toward trans rights (“once you tell me a man is a woman…”)
- References to “soyboy” and “clown world” – common alt-right or anti-progressive slang
2. Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum:
- Moderate Authoritarian
- Supports state use of force in protests (“rubber bullets” acceptable, asks for solutions to violent rioting)
- Supports blasphemy laws if applied “equally” but is not personally in favor of them
- Wants restrictions on porn for minors, but not outright bans
- Does not call for complete government control, but supports enforcement of order and traditional values
Summary of Traits
| Trait | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Very low; overtly hostile |
| Kindness | Low; deliberately mocking and demeaning |
| Emotional Tone | Predominantly angry, defensive, and disdainful |
| Rhetorical Style | Adversarial, sarcastic, and combative |
| Cognitive Ability | Reasonably informed, but clouded by heavy bias and emotional reactivity |
| Political Leaning | Far Right, Moderate Authoritarian |
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,992
- Reaction score
- 3,903
@Neph 's result
Profile of the Poster
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
| Category | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Generally civil, uses sarcasm and mockery sparingly and usually in context |
| Kindness | Mixed – snarky and combative at times, but also empathetic, rational, and open to discussion |
| Anger | Mild-to-moderate; triggered by political hypocrisy, Trumpism, and perceived stupidity |
| Tone | Satirical, skeptical, occasionally blunt but not overtly hostile |
| Empathy | Expresses sympathy for serious issues (e.g. friend with cancer, immigration) and shows social awareness |
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Reasoning: Poster demonstrates understanding of economics (e.g. supply/demand, rare earth trade), political systems, and logical fallacies (e.g. “false equivalence”)
- Language Use: Confident, articulate, dry wit. Swears occasionally but not aggressively.
- Pattern Recognition: Highlights trends and systemic issues (e.g. ideological capture in soft sciences, political polarization)
- Humor/Irony: Sarcastic, self-aware (“kiss of death,” “Trumpy boy,” “zero decency”)
Ideological Orientation
Left–Right Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Criticism of Trump, MAGA, and the American right | Left-leaning |
| Skeptical of “they/them” identity politics, supports tougher borders | Moderate/Centrist tendencies |
| Supports universal healthcare, evidence-based policy, and opposes corporate political donations | Centre-left |
| Past vote: Centre-right → Present vote: Centre-left | Moderate shift |
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Supports critical peer review and scientific process | Pro-intellectual |
| Opposes government overreach (e.g., blasphemy laws, excessive surveillance implied) | Libertarian-leaning |
| Moderate support for law/order and border control, but no authoritarian rhetoric | Balanced |
| Pro-choice in media access (on porn and censorship), disapproves of cult-like politics | Libertarian side |
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,992
- Reaction score
- 3,903
@Limbo Pete
Profile of the Poster
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
| Category | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Low to moderate; tone is biting and sarcastic, but not overtly hostile without provocation |
| Kindness | Low on surface warmth, but underlying empathy appears in defense of vulnerable groups |
| Anger | Moderate to high; especially when engaging with perceived injustice, hypocrisy, or authoritarian overreach |
| Tone | Witty, sardonic, passionate, and frequently exasperated with bad-faith arguments |
| Empathy | Demonstrates strong concern for civil rights, healthcare access, and humane immigration policy |
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use: Highly articulate, with creative use of sarcasm and analogy. Swears occasionally, but thoughtfully.
- Argumentation: Consistently asks for evidence, legal clarity, and logical consistency. Pushes debates into specific, defensible terms.
- Analytical Depth: Engages deeply with legal frameworks, systemic power structures, and policy implications. Separates emotion from legality when needed.
Ideological Orientation
Left–Right Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Strong criticism of Trump, MAGA, right-wing rhetoric | Left |
| Advocates for universal healthcare, immigrant protections, and child rights | Progressive left |
| Opposes authoritarian and corporate overreach in government | Left-populist lens |
| Disgusted by bad-faith defenses and moral relativism | Ethically motivated leftism |
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Emphasis on individual liberty and constitutional protection | Libertarian-leaning |
| Deep skepticism of concentrated executive power | Libertarian |
| Opposition to death penalty, forced deportations, and performative judicial rulings | Anti-authoritarian |
| Consistent with values of personal rights and limits on government interference | Libertarian ethics |
Archetype Match
Summary Table
| Trait | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Low to moderate (cutting, not cruel) |
| Rudeness/Kindness | Confrontational but morally grounded |
| Anger Level | High – directed toward injustice |
| Intellectual Depth | High; excels in argument and nuance |
| Political Leaning | Progressive Left |
| Authority Preference | Libertarian |
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,992
- Reaction score
- 3,903
@deviake
Note yours had a lot of memes it can't parse, so the posts provided are fewer than others:
Note yours had a lot of memes it can't parse, so the posts provided are fewer than others:
Profile of the Poster
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
| Category | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Low. The poster is confrontational, sarcastic, and occasionally hostile. Name-calling and personal digs are frequent. |
| Kindness | Mixed. Often obscured by aggressive phrasing, but flashes of empathy appear (e.g., condolences for loss, concern for systemic abuse). |
| Anger | High. Regular expressions of frustration with political hypocrisy, perceived right-wing rhetoric, and social injustice. |
| Tone | Combative, snarky, profane, emotionally charged, but layered with irony and satire. |
| Empathy | Context-sensitive. High when discussing child welfare, inequality, or systemic harm. Low when engaging with opponents or trolls. |
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use: Fluent, sarcastic, meme-literate, uses internet vernacular creatively (“crybully,” “Commander-in-Sex-Pest,” “terminally online,” etc.). Switches easily between jokey jabs and more serious socio-political commentary.
- Argumentation: While sometimes distracted by insult, the poster makes coherent systemic critiques (e.g., capitalism’s growth-debt cycle, structural injustice, exploitation of labor). Capable of engaging thoughtfully when not baited.
- Analytical Depth: High awareness of economic and political mechanisms. Understands nuance in debates like immigration, responsibility, and trauma outcomes.
Ideological Orientation
Left–Right Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Opposes ICE, right-wing memes, Trump, and corporate exploitation | Progressive left |
| Advocates for labor protection, immigrant rights, dismantling abusive systems | Left-populist |
| Blames systemic factors like capitalism, marketing psychology, and state-enabled inequality | Far-left lens |
| Deep skepticism of mainstream liberal complicity (e.g., critiques of Hogg/Bernie treatment) | Independent left |
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Strong defense of individual rights (especially immigrants, the abused, the working class) | Libertarian-leaning |
| Opposes state overreach (ICE, religious extremism, corporate power structures) | Libertarian |
| Supports structural reform over authoritarian enforcement | Anti-authoritarian |
| Critical of punitive models of justice and exploitation-based governance | Civil-liberties focused |
Archetype Match
Summary Table
| Trait | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Low (abrasive, mocking) |
| Rudeness/Kindness | Contextual — crude, but not malicious without provocation |
| Anger Level | High, especially toward injustice and hypocrisy |
| Intellectual Depth | High; socially and economically literate |
| Political Leaning | Progressive / Far Left |
| Authority Preference | Libertarian / Anti-authoritarian |
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2015
- Messages
- 16,980
- Reaction score
- 13,870
@deviake
Note yours had a lot of memes it can't parse, so the posts provided are fewer than others:
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
Category Assessment Politeness Low. The poster is confrontational, sarcastic, and occasionally hostile. Name-calling and personal digs are frequent. Kindness Mixed. Often obscured by aggressive phrasing, but flashes of empathy appear (e.g., condolences for loss, concern for systemic abuse). Anger High. Regular expressions of frustration with political hypocrisy, perceived right-wing rhetoric, and social injustice. Tone Combative, snarky, profane, emotionally charged, but layered with irony and satire. Empathy Context-sensitive. High when discussing child welfare, inequality, or systemic harm. Low when engaging with opponents or trolls.
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use: Fluent, sarcastic, meme-literate, uses internet vernacular creatively (“crybully,” “Commander-in-Sex-Pest,” “terminally online,” etc.). Switches easily between jokey jabs and more serious socio-political commentary.
- Argumentation: While sometimes distracted by insult, the poster makes coherent systemic critiques (e.g., capitalism’s growth-debt cycle, structural injustice, exploitation of labor). Capable of engaging thoughtfully when not baited.
- Analytical Depth: High awareness of economic and political mechanisms. Understands nuance in debates like immigration, responsibility, and trauma outcomes.
Left–Right Spectrum
Evidence Leaning Opposes ICE, right-wing memes, Trump, and corporate exploitation Progressive left Advocates for labor protection, immigrant rights, dismantling abusive systems Left-populist Blames systemic factors like capitalism, marketing psychology, and state-enabled inequality Far-left lens Deep skepticism of mainstream liberal complicity (e.g., critiques of Hogg/Bernie treatment) Independent left
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
Evidence Leaning Strong defense of individual rights (especially immigrants, the abused, the working class) Libertarian-leaning Opposes state overreach (ICE, religious extremism, corporate power structures) Libertarian Supports structural reform over authoritarian enforcement Anti-authoritarian Critical of punitive models of justice and exploitation-based governance Civil-liberties focused
Trait Assessment Politeness Low (abrasive, mocking) Rudeness/Kindness Contextual — crude, but not malicious without provocation Anger Level High, especially toward injustice and hypocrisy Intellectual Depth High; socially and economically literate Political Leaning Progressive / Far Left Authority Preference Libertarian / Anti-authoritarian
Thanks bud, appreciate it
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,992
- Reaction score
- 3,903
@ShadowRun
Profile of the Poster
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
| Category | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Low. The tone is mocking, dismissive, and reactive; often uses ridicule or sarcasm to push back on others. |
| Kindness | Minimal. Offers very little emotional empathy or support. Primarily interested in dunking or quipping. |
| Anger | Low-to-moderate. The anger seems passive-aggressive or channeled through sarcasm and memes rather than overt rage. |
| Tone | Disjointed, ironic, jaded, sardonic, often conspiratorial or casually hostile. |
| Empathy | Very limited. The poster occasionally mentions things like due process or overreach, but mostly remains emotionally detached or flippant. |
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use: Slang-heavy, low-effort phrasing ("lol," "ok PBS," "lol at the dems"), occasionally incoherent or vague. Language is fragmented and meme-driven.
- Argumentation: Few detailed arguments. Most opinions are one-liners, mockery, or vague insinuations (e.g., “literally Hitler,” “they have a disagreement about policy”). Rarely supports claims with evidence or logic.
- Analytical Depth: Minimal. The poster shows flashes of insight (e.g., mention of overprosecution, cyber intel, due process), but offers no depth or consistent framework.
Ideological Orientation
Left–Right Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Criticism of Biden, Democrats, and liberal media | Right-leaning |
| Vague support for Trump, Musk, DeSantis, and anti-woke ideas | Populist Right |
| Occasional contradictions (e.g., calling Trump “toxic,” praising due process) | Possibly independent, but performs right-wing talking points |
| Use of common right-wing rhetorical tropes (e.g., “literally Hitler,” “left-wing terrorism,” “PBS”) | Reactionary Right cues |
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Distrust of the media, vague support for police/military structure | Slight authoritarian cues |
| Vague calls for “due process” and dislike of excessive prosecution | Libertarian streak |
| No consistent support for civil liberties, but some distrust of government inefficiency | Incoherent signals |
- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 37,077
- Reaction score
- 38,309
Haha what a queer@ShadowRun
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
Category Assessment Politeness Low. The tone is mocking, dismissive, and reactive; often uses ridicule or sarcasm to push back on others. Kindness Minimal. Offers very little emotional empathy or support. Primarily interested in dunking or quipping. Anger Low-to-moderate. The anger seems passive-aggressive or channeled through sarcasm and memes rather than overt rage. Tone Disjointed, ironic, jaded, sardonic, often conspiratorial or casually hostile. Empathy Very limited. The poster occasionally mentions things like due process or overreach, but mostly remains emotionally detached or flippant.
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use: Slang-heavy, low-effort phrasing ("lol," "ok PBS," "lol at the dems"), occasionally incoherent or vague. Language is fragmented and meme-driven.
- Argumentation: Few detailed arguments. Most opinions are one-liners, mockery, or vague insinuations (e.g., “literally Hitler,” “they have a disagreement about policy”). Rarely supports claims with evidence or logic.
- Analytical Depth: Minimal. The poster shows flashes of insight (e.g., mention of overprosecution, cyber intel, due process), but offers no depth or consistent framework.
Left–Right Spectrum
Evidence Leaning Criticism of Biden, Democrats, and liberal media Right-leaning Vague support for Trump, Musk, DeSantis, and anti-woke ideas Populist Right Occasional contradictions (e.g., calling Trump “toxic,” praising due process) Possibly independent, but performs right-wing talking points Use of common right-wing rhetorical tropes (e.g., “literally Hitler,” “left-wing terrorism,” “PBS”) Reactionary Right cues
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
Evidence Leaning Distrust of the media, vague support for police/military structure Slight authoritarian cues Vague calls for “due process” and dislike of excessive prosecution Libertarian streak No consistent support for civil liberties, but some distrust of government inefficiency Incoherent signals
- Joined
- May 14, 2004
- Messages
- 11,171
- Reaction score
- 9,924
Did @Jack V Savage die or something? I haven't seen him stinking up any threads since the elections at least.
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 37,171
- Reaction score
- 61,344
I killed(his online self) him. He lost a bet against me and never came back.
@Neph how do you run that analysis?
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,992
- Reaction score
- 3,903
I pull the last 5 pages of comments of a user, filter it down to the War Room only, and then feed the comments to ChatGPT to give me a sentiment analysis. I ask it to look at a few things such as tone and content and then evaluate it on the political spectrum.
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 37,171
- Reaction score
- 61,344
Can you please run mine?
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,992
- Reaction score
- 3,903
Profile of the Poster
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
| Category | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Moderate. Occasionally sharp or dismissive, but often engages respectfully, especially when debating facts or predictions. |
| Kindness | Selective. Shows moments of decency and even warmth (e.g., respectful debate, gratitude toward other users). Insults are rare and usually mild. |
| Anger | Low-to-moderate. Frustrated by misinformation or poor arguments, but rarely lashes out. Most emotion is directed at public figures (e.g., Trump, sleazy politicians) or inaccurate claims. |
| Tone | Rational, data-driven, occasionally sarcastic, but mostly composed. Some humor, a little bitterness, and clear emotional investment in fairness and truth. |
| Empathy | Present, especially in medical discussions (e.g., prostate cancer), social justice issues (e.g., child sacrifice metaphor), and workplace automation concerns. |
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use: Fluent, analytical, and numerically competent. Regularly references data sources (Forbes, Bloomberg, stock metrics). Uses economic, technological, and political terminology correctly.
- Argumentation: Highly structured. Frequently corrects factual inaccuracies, rebuts claims with specific data, and explains long-term investment theses (e.g., TSLA to $2000 via M2/inflation). Challenges ideological opponents with verifiable numbers.
- Analytical Depth: High. Shows understanding of finance, AI impacts on labor, political dynamics, and historical trends. Offers thoughtful predictions, not just opinions.
Ideological Orientation
Left–Right Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Criticizes Trump, calls him sleazy and corrupt | Left-leaning |
| Supports Elon Musk’s ventures and strongly defends Tesla’s innovation and valuation | Tech-optimist right tendencies |
| Voices frustration with California liberals but calls out misinformation from both political sides | Centrist-populist streak |
| Concerned about income inequality, automation, and political dishonesty | Economically left, socially moderate |
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Favors individual action (e.g., career decisions, financial independence, personal healthcare choices) | Libertarian-leaning |
| Skeptical of government inefficiency but not opposed to regulation or oversight | Libertarian-centrist |
| Dislikes propaganda and emotionally manipulative media across the spectrum | Anti-authoritarian |
Archetype Match
Summary Table
| Trait | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Moderate and discussion-oriented |
| Rudeness/Kindness | Occasionally curt but not mean-spirited |
| Anger Level | Low; more exasperated than furious |
| Intellectual Depth | Very high – analytic and data-literate |
| Political Leaning | Center-left with tech-optimist flexibility |
| Authority Preference | Mildly Libertarian |
- Status
Latest posts
-
2026 Its a long way to the top if you want to rock and roll log!- Latest: ROcknrollracing
-
-
-
