- Joined
- May 30, 2016
- Messages
- 4,688
- Reaction score
- 2
Me 2, I think Trump is a bum but I defend Conor passionately. 49-1
I love Conor.
Me 2, I think Trump is a bum but I defend Conor passionately. 49-1
I love Conor.
he's the ventriloquist of investigative journalism
You want to see Van Jones' weiner?
no you did that, your description sounded like what I now imagine your computer hard drive looks likeYou were able to put a solid, homoerotic spin on the point I was making...
Well played, sir. Well played.
yes so edited that people on this board took complete sentences and assigned completely different words and meaning to everything the planned parenthood slime were caught saying.... i dont get the referance.
Okeefe is known for using editing to make fake videos. This is obviously heavily edited. I will remain skeptical.
no you did that, your description sounded like what I'd imagine your computer hard drive looks like
This is what I don't understand.What the fuck is a "nothingburger" anyway? Does it come with cheese?
So now men who watch straight porn are really closet homo's because big dicks are often involved?
I think someone's projecting their own love of dick watching...
not singling you out (as you're not a leftist anyhoo),This is what I don't understand.
CNN is a news organization (one of many) covering the investigation, not conducting it. That would be the FBI. Furthermore, as Van Jones stated in the above video, he doesn't see any Presidency-ending scandal currently-- or on the horizon-- from what has been uncovered so far. That would appear to be apparent to everyone but Maxine Waters, Al Green, and a handful of other House Democrats.
That doesn't preclude the wisdom and necessity of pursuing the investigation into many of his closest advisers, and Russian activity in general, with regard to cyberterrorism and espionage; not just during the campaign, but currently and going forward. This is a matter of national security.
Is national security the "nothing burger"?
did you see the video from a couple days ago where the cnn executives said they knew there was nothing to the Russia story, they're just running with it for ratings? and that they were sure nothing would ever come out of the story because all the details had been leaked long ago.This is what I don't understand.
CNN is a news organization (one of many) covering the investigation, not conducting it. That would be the FBI. Furthermore, as Van Jones stated in the above video, he doesn't see any Presidency-ending scandal currently-- or on the horizon-- from what has been uncovered so far. That would appear to be apparent to everyone but Maxine Waters, Al Green, and a handful of other House Democrats.
That doesn't preclude the wisdom and necessity of pursuing the investigation into many of his closest advisers, and Russian activity in general, with regard to cyberterrorism and espionage; not just during the campaign, but currently and going forward. This is a matter of national security.
Is national security the "nothing burger"?
That producer doesn't even produce Russian coverage. CNN pursuing ratings doesn't invalidate the legitimacy of the investigation, either. These aren't mutually exclusive ideas.did you see the video from a couple days ago where the cnn executives said they knew there was nothing to the Russia story, they're just running with it for ratings? and that they were sure nothing would ever come out of the story because all the details had been leaked long ago.
The one they themselves retracted? By the way...which "actual news stories" did they not run? What vital news story or coverage did we miss?and that they also made the decision to pull off actual news stories to go back and run with the Russian faux story?
This dodges the challenge in the crux of my point. Nothing in this post addresses what I wrote above.whats there to understand, they fucking told everyone whats going on
Then you definitely missed or forgot about my criticism of Hillary. As many have pointed out, though, Colin Powell also managed his servers in such a vulnerable fashion, and people like Huckabee (while in accordance with the law) were no more secure with regard to state secrets. Furthermore, Clinton's vulnerability was exploited by the Russians, was it not? It's not like this stuff doesn't overlap.not singling you out (as you're not a leftist anyhoo),
but I don't recall ANY concerns over national security from any leftist when a Presidential Candidate, her main advisor, and her advisor's husband all blatantly and flagrantly violated OpSec and IAA protocols for all federal workers
People being extremely hyperbolic towards one side, while going out of their way to downplay their own side's egregious faults has always been a thing in politics, but never to this level.
Not sure if it's been posted, but here is Van Jones reply tweet:
Denial of what?Doesn't sound like a denial.
This is what I don't understand.
CNN is a news organization (one of many) covering the investigation, not conducting it. That would be the FBI. Furthermore, as Van Jones stated in the above video, he doesn't see any Presidency-ending scandal currently-- or on the horizon-- from what has been uncovered so far. That would appear to be apparent to everyone but Maxine Waters, Al Green, and a handful of other House Democrats.
That doesn't preclude the wisdom and necessity of pursuing the investigation into many of his closest advisers, and Russian activity in general, with regard to cyberterrorism and espionage; not just during the campaign, but currently and going forward. This is a matter of national security.
Is national security the "nothing burger"?