- Joined
- Feb 11, 2025
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 1
I have to go with lennox he just had all the tools only ever that one shot from McCall
If you think it’s weak now, wait until the rest of the alphabets adopt bridgerweight. It’ll sink heavily.Yeah, that's true of many great HWs though. Ali, Louis, Marciano, Holyfield and a lot of others could have fought that weight (or even lighter, Marciano was 185, Louis about 200). Ali and Holyfield both fought under HW as amateurs.
I think the truth is that this is a weak generation of HW boxers. Just looking at the age of the champion makes that painfully clear.
No, Usyk mostly would not have been the undisputed champion in the past because there was almost always at least one fighter that was better.
I'd take Lennox as well, and he did have all the tools, but saying it was only ever that one shot from McCall isn't true. Rahman also KO'd him in the first fight.I have to go with lennox he just had all the tools only ever that one shot from McCall
Styles make fights. Besides, all 3 of those guys lost to worse fighters than AJ & Fury.Usyk BARELY beat AJ and old-flabby Fury... he's not beating either Klitschko, and definitely not Lennox.
Barely? What? He easily beat Joshua twice and the second Fury fight wasnt really close either.Usyk BARELY beat AJ and old-flabby Fury... he's not beating either Klitschko, and definitely not Lennox.