Not exactly, disease exterminated 95% of them.
But more to the point, I think we can all agree that early Americans were not the perfect exemplars of God's divine plan for the universe.
This is a lot harder for Muslims to argue re: Mohammed and the early caliphs. Supposedly those guys are like divine exemplars. The whole name "Sunni," which is the subject of this thread, refers to the "practice" or actions of Mohammed, as well of those of the "Rightly Guided" caliphs who followed him, caliph being the divinely appointed leader of the Muslim religious community.
Fun fact, where does the word "caliph" even come from? Until caliph Abd al Malik, we have no record of anybody using that word to describe a Muslim leader. Abd al Malik appears to have taken it from a reference in the Qur'an to King David, as God's representative. The Caliph is Allah's representative on Earth. When Sunni Islam later emerged, it reacted against this earlier form of Islam, and downplayed the caliph and his religious role in favor of the "Ummah," the community of believers. In Shiite Islam, of course, that reversal against a centralized religious leader did not happen as thoroughly, which many scholars believe shows an archaic retention of primitive Islamic beliefs.
Prior to Abd al Malik, the Arab kings called themselves "Commander (Amir) of the Believers." Only with Abd al Malik did they start calling themselves Caliph, leader of Muslims. This is why many scholars see Abd al Malik as essentially the beginning of "Islam" as a distinct religion.
By the way, I have to express my admiration for your posting name, which I assume is a reference to the Arabic term for Alexander the Great (the "two horned one"), as used in the Qur'an.