• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Economy US judges order Trump administration to reinstate thousands of fired workers

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
8,781
Reaction score
11,073
By Daniel Wiessner and Nate Raymond

  • Maryland judge orders workers reinstated at 18 agencies
  • California judge says six agencies were improperly ordered to fire workers
  • Biggest setback so far for bid to shrink federal workforce
March 13 (Reuters) - Federal judges in California and Maryland on Thursday ordered U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to reinstate thousands of probationary federal workers who lost their jobs as part of mass firings carried out at 19 agencies.

The back-to-back rulings were the most significant blow yet to the effort by Trump and top adviser Elon Musk to drastically shrink the federal bureaucracy. Government agencies face a Thursday deadline to submit plans for a second wave of mass layoffs and to slash their budgets.

U.S. District Judge James Bredar in Baltimore agreed, opens new tab with 20 Democratic-led states that 18 of the agencies which had fired probationary employees en masse in recent weeks violated regulations governing the laying off of federal workers.

Bredar's restraining order applies to, among other agencies, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the U.S. Agency for International Development, all three of which have been in the deregulatory and cost-cutting cross-hairs of the Trump administration.
images

Other agencies covered by the judge's order include the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, Transportation, Treasury and Veterans Affairs.

While the administration argued it dismissed each of the employees for performance or other individualized reasons, the judge said that was not true, which would make the job cuts a form of mass layoff necessitating advance notice to the states, who have obligations to assist their newly unemployed citizens.

"The sheer number of employees that were terminated in a matter of days belies any argument that these terminations were due to the employees' individual unsatisfactory performance or conduct," wrote Bredar, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama.

images

His decision came hours after U.S. District Judge William Alsup during a hearing in San Francisco ordered the reinstatement of probationary employees terminated at six agencies, including the U.S. Department of Defense, which was not covered by the Maryland decision.

Alsup said the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the human resources department for federal agencies, had improperly ordered those agencies to fire workers en masse even though it lacked the power to do so.

"It is a sad day when our government would fire some good employee and say it was based on performance when they know good and well that's a lie," said Alsup, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, a Democrat.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt in a statement issued following Alsup's decision said the administration would "immediately fight back."

3FKAKHUCOJMWHE5DQ52WLIJ3LY.jpg

"The President has the authority to exercise the power of the entire executive branch - singular district court judges cannot abuse the power of the entire judiciary to thwart the President's agenda," Leavitt said.

24,000 PROBATIONARY WORKERS

Trump and Musk, architect of the administration's Department of Government Efficiency, are pursuing an aggressive campaign to shrink the federal workforce, made up of about 2.3 million workers when Trump took office in January.

The first round of mass firings focused on probationary workers, who have limited grounds to challenge their terminations. At least 24,000 have been terminated since Trump returned to office, according to the Democratic-led states, who filed their lawsuit challenging the firings last week.

Probationary workers typically have less than one year of service in their current roles, though some are longtime federal employees. They have fewer job protections than other government workers but in general can only be fired for performance issues.

The states in their lawsuit say that by firing workers en masse, federal agencies engaged in mass layoffs that are supposed to be guided by a series of regulations. The agencies did not follow those procedures, though, such as giving state and local governments 60 days' notice in advance of mass layoffs, the states say.
images

The states say the terminations have left them with an abrupt influx in unemployment claims and higher demand for social services.
The Trump administration says that federal agencies can terminate probationary workers for virtually any reason. OPM said in February the probationary period "is a continuation of the job application process, not an entitlement for permanent employment."

The lawsuit before Alsup was filed by unions, nonprofit groups and the state of Washington. They claim the mass firings were unlawful because they were ordered by OPM rather than left to the discretion of individual agencies.

The plaintiffs include the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents 800,000 federal workers. The union's president, Everett Kelley, said in a statement Alsup's decision was an important victory against "an administration hellbent on crippling federal agencies and their work on behalf of the American public."

Alsup last month had temporarily blocked OPM from ordering agencies to fire probationary employees, but declined at the time to require that fired workers get their jobs back. The plaintiffs subsequently amended their lawsuit to include the agencies that fired probationary workers.
images

The Merit Systems Protection Board, which reviews federal employees' appeals when they are fired, earlier this month ordered the Agriculture Department to reinstate nearly 6,000 probationary workers at least temporarily.

Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York, Nate Raymond in Boston and Brendan Pierson in New York; Editing by Alistair Bell, David Bario, David Gregorio and Tom Hogue

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us...inistration-ordering-mass-firings-2025-03-13/
 
Of course that was going to happen. That's why executive ordering changes through isn't a great idea.
 
Yeah, activist judges are on the lose, much as they were during Trump's first term in office.

I can imagine most Americans don't want these unelected judges ruling America. Only the Supreme Court is considered an equal to the executive branch.

Judicial Coup​

Federal judges are illegally seizing power by blocking Trump’s policies.​



.....Under the constitutional scheme, judges cannot both serve as the leaders who make policy and who check those leaders who make policy. That’s not a judiciary, that’s a tyranny.

If that sounds like mere rhetoric, it comes from the highest of all sources in American history.

Thomas Jefferson cautioned that judges have “the same passions for party, for power” and “their power is the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control.”

“The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that, to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign with themselves.”

He warned that “to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions” would be “a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy”.

The federal judges blocking President Trump’s decisions on spurious pretexts such as the APA are engaged in a judicial coup that Jefferson, Lincoln and our greatest leaders had defied.

If President Trump follows in their footsteps, he will not be defying the law, but standing up for the power of the people and the integrity of the Constitution.
 
The judicial branch will continue to lose legitimacy.

I remember Biden just saying, "Fuck it. I'm canceling student loans." So I can see Trump saying "Fuck it" as well.
 
The federal judges blocking President Trump’s decisions on spurious pretexts such as the APA are engaged in a judicial coup that Jefferson, Lincoln and our greatest leaders had defied.

Ok so how does it works then? if the President orders someone to make something blatantly illegal, like you know jailing a journalist because he spoke shit of the president.

What's the recourse there? journalist must remain in jail until the SCOTUS hears the case?
 
The judicial branch will continue to lose legitimacy.

I remember Biden just saying, "Fuck it. I'm canceling student loans." So I can see Trump saying "Fuck it" as well.

Biden only cancelled loans he had the authority to cancel most loans weren't cancelled.
 
This will obviously be overturned in the court of appeals

Trump is under no obligation to keep probationary employees. No legal case for it. He doesn’t need any reason either. This judge is arguing that if he said he was downsizing then that’s fine, but he has to reinstate them because it was implied they’re a bunch of inefficient cans first.

Activist judges ruin the judicial branch because if they try to usurp the executive branch constitutional power from the executive..then there is ultimately no choice but to ignore them.

For now, the highest courts are still somewhat honest so Trump can afford to wait the week or two it takes for left wing judges to get smacked down by the higher courts. So he doesn’t need to create a standoff.

These employees won’t be returning
 
Ok so how does it works then? if the President orders someone to make something blatantly illegal, like you know jailing a journalist because he spoke shit of the president.

What's the recourse there? journalist must remain in jail until the SCOTUS hears the case?

Why are you even addressing these ridiculous arguments?

They're complaining about "activist judges" while waiting for the Supreme Court to fix everything. The Supreme Court hand-picked by the Heritage Foundation, the same brain trust that came up with Project 2025.

It takes huge balls and a tiny brain to call the current Supreme Court the voice of sanity.
 
Back
Top