Economy US Aggression on Tattoos Sources Random British Man as Example [Tren de Aragua]


A tattoo belonging to a man from Derbyshire has appeared in a US government document used to identify members of a notorious Venezuelan gang - despite the man having no connection to the group.
Pete Belton, 44, from Ilkeston says he was shocked to find his forearm featured in a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) document used to help identify alleged members of Tren de Aragua (TdA), a transnational criminal organisation.
"I'm just an average middle-aged man from Derbyshire," he told BBC Verify.
Mr Belton said it was a "bit strange, bit funny at first" but is now worried the family trip he booked to Miami with his wife and daughter in August might end up "being a six month all-inclusive holiday to Guantanamo".
Pete Belton with his dog, with his tattoo visible
Image source,Pete Belton
The Trump administration has already deported hundreds of alleged gang members to a high-security jail El Salvador. Lawyers for some of those deportees say they have been been incorrectly identified as TdA members based on their tattoos.
Mr Belton's tattoo - a clock face with the date and time of his daughter's birth - was included in a set of nine images for "detecting and identifying" TdA members. Other tattoos featured stars, crowns and a Michael Jordan "jumpman" logo.
"Open source material has depicted TdA members with a combination of the below tattoos," states the document which appeared in court filings, external.
Nine gang tattoos in US Homeland Security document. Pictures of tattoos include a jump man symbol, Ak-47s, trains, crowns, stars, clocks and a skull with a gas mask.

But reverse image searches show that several of the pictures first appeared on tattoo websites with no obvious links to Venezuela or TdA.
One of them led BBC Verify to an Instagram post by a Nottingham-based tattoo artist who posted about Mr Belton's tattoo nearly a decade ago.
Side-by-side comparison of two pictures of the tattoo: On the left is from a US document, on the right is the Instagram post showing Mr Belton's tattoo, shared by a Nottingham-based tattoo artist's tattoo, shared by a Nottingham-based tattoo artist

The tattoo image in the DHS document is worse quality than the Instagram post, which was shared in 2016, but it is clearly the same arm and features the same clock face tattoo.
The same image of Mr Belton's tattoo also appeared in a September 2024 report by the Texas Department of Public Safety, external (DPS) about TdA activity.
BBC Verify contacted both the US DHS and the Texas DPS about the source of the images, but did not receive a response.
But in an email the DHS said it was confident in its law enforcement's intelligence and that its "assessments go well beyond just gang affiliate tattoos and social media."
It's unclear exactly how Mr Belton's tattoo ended up in the US documents, but he's worried about being linked to the gang.
"In my head I'm thinking if I'm working in border force and I saw me walking through I'd think 'hey up we've got one, he's the one in the document'."
He provided multiple images of the tattoo to prove that it's his - and he says that he has no association to the Venezuelan group.
An image showing Mr Belton's tattoo with the clock face and the date: March 2nd 2009. Underneath the clock is a dove's tattoo with the clock face and the date: March 2nd 2009. Underneath the clock is a dove
Image source,Pete Belton
The US government hasn't deported anyone based on their tattoos alone, according to comments from an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official in a court filing last month, external.
However, court documents show immigration officials are employing a points-based system known as the "Alien Enemy Validation Guide", external to determine if someone is linked to the Venezuelan gang.
It includes a scorecard, and according to the document, eight points across a number of categories could be grounds for arrest or deportation.
Half of these points can be given if a "subject has tattoos denoting membership or loyalty to TdA".
The document says if all eight points come from the symbolism category, which includes tattoos, then further consultation should be taken before designating someone as a member of TdA.
A copy of the Alien Enemy Validation Guide which shows that four points are given when a subject has tattoos denoting membership/loyalty to TdA

Venezuelan investigative journalist Ronna Risquez, who wrote a book on TdA's origins, said tattoos alone are not evidence of membership.
"TdA does not have tattoos that identifies the gang," she said.
"To confirm whether a person is a member of TdA, authorities must conduct a police investigation to determine whether they have a criminal record. A tattoo, their clothing, or their nationality are not proof."
However, there have been cases where lawyers have argued that people have been wrongfully identified based on their tattoos and were subsequently deported.
US media, external have reported on a man who's lawyers say was deported because of a crown tattoo which was inspired by the Real Madrid football club logo.
Another case saw a makeup artist, external was sent to El Salvador after his a crown tattoo with the words "mum" and "dad" was used by US officials as evidence for gang membership, according to his attorneys.
Back in Derbyshire, Mr Belton says his family have considered cancelling their trip to the US due to the potential risks, but they are going to monitor how the story develops.
"Hopefully now they'd realise I'm not a Venezuelan gangster but I've seen crazier things happen in the news recently, so we're just going to wait and see."

---

Kinda had to leave the images there as it's essential to the article.

But WTF is going on when a random British guy is used as an example of what body art is or is not acceptable?

A literal war on art is so honestly absurd, I don't see how anyone can stand for it?

The people writing this must be 90 year olds who think dyed hair and bones through noses equates to evil.

That trashy star tattoo is one of the most common tattoo ever lmao
 
That very well may be the case. That doesn't mean we get to wave due process. That's unconstitutional. Why in the fuck are you guys being so obtuse? It feels like these are not good faith arguments. Basically, you are saying, "They're illegal. I don't care what happens to them". It's an absurd position, and a very barbaric one as well. Shame on you and all your brethren.

If you are here ileagly then that's all that needs to be established.
 
The government should have to prove that though, right? In court? We shouldn’t be ok with the government simply claiming that people shouldn’t be there and then disappearing their asses.

So if they can make it over the border then they get to stay untill they get a court date.

So everyone at the border gets catch and release.

We just voted that out. If it's not legal then the courts will decide.
 
So if they can make it over the border then they get to stay untill they get a court date.

So everyone at the border gets catch and release.

We just voted that out. If it's not legal then the courts will decide.
That was my point—you didn’t want a whole bunch of types of perfectly legal immigration.

There’s no legal way to apply for asylum unless one is already in the country.
But irrespective of that, the people in question here actually took our laws and regulations into consideration before entering the country, and made sure they entered legally.

If you “voted that out,” that’s fine, but shouldn’t be applied retroactively to people who did everything legally.

Likewise, if you “voted that out,” then you guys should stop saying you are fine with immigrants as long as they’re here legally, because that’s very much not true.
 
The US department of Homeland Security doesn’t even know the “Air Jordan” logo with his number underneath? You can’t make this shit up even if you were trying.

“Jump man” Symbol

group-laugh.gif
It has more to be an authoritarian country, and take away people’s rights which were going into slowly .

You can tell who the beta male cucks are on here they side with the orange nightmare all across the board from sex assaults to trying to rid freedom of speech, he’s literally banned online books from Amazon he doesn’t like and has made up a terrorist arrest policy / illegal alien throwing innocent ppl in jail unlawfully in vans …you can’t make this stuff up . 😂
 
That was my point—you didn’t want a whole bunch of types of perfectly legal immigration.

There’s no legal way to apply for asylum unless one is already in the country.
But irrespective of that, the people in question here actually took our laws and regulations into consideration before entering the country, and made sure they entered legally.

If you “voted that out,” that’s fine, but shouldn’t be applied retroactively to people who did everything legally.

Likewise, if you “voted that out,” then you guys should stop saying you are fine with immigrants as long as they’re here legally, because that’s very much not true.

If they are looking for asylum then they should have stayed in Mexico and got it there.
 
If they are looking for asylum then they should have stayed in Mexico and got it there.
That’s pretty dumb that’s the reason for the asylum policy is to get out of country they are fleeing and the process is much quicker if it is over here , if one is seeking asylum they already have rights while in the states .

When I see the word asylum and see any Trump supporters, I think of this though .

( An "insane asylum" is an older, and now usually offensive, term for a hospital or institution dedicated to the treatment of individuals with mental illness. )
 
They are required to stop and apply at the first safe country. If they came through Mexico then they were in the fist safe country.
 
They are required to stop and apply at the first safe country. If they came through Mexico then they were in the fist safe country.
That’s another LIE ..They can continue onward to the U.S because International law and the Refugee Convention do not mandate what b.s your pushing here .

violence and a lot of criminals are near the borderline of Mexico so how is it proven safe for asylum seekers anyway ?Are you o.k ,are you drinking bc you sound like it like all Trumpers on here . Lol
 
Back
Top