International Updated: Trump says he authorised CIA in Venezuela as Maduro says 'no to regime change'

Must be because both drugs and prostitution is illegal in Sweden
- Why? I dont care about drug-heads. But why not pay to fornicate?

Obviously they should get right for retirament plans and health. But thats a thing i cant get. Several of those woman are explored by the porn industry or politicians anyway.
 
Yeah I know the Nordic Countries can be a lot more Nanny-like than I prefer. I work with a lot of Norwegians and Icelandic.

Switzerland had a massive drug problem and implemented a medical aspect of treating it. You can do drugs, and get then for free. But you have to also be in therapy, job placement, etc.
- Some of them even TRT is ilegal.
 
- Why? I dont care about drug-heads. But why not pay to fornicate?

Obviously they should get right for retirament plans and health. But thats a thing i cant get. Several of those woman are explored by the porn industry or politicians anyway.
I think the Ladies of the Night and the Johns should all be tested for STDs before fornicating
 
yea all those deaths aren't bad at all...




Are we going to start dishing out capital punishment for anyone who works for a defense contractor to? That's had tangential your logic is.

If someone is caught dealing or part of an OD, there are laws and punishments for it already. You're proposing something entirely different and arguing that any proximity to cartels is cause for death.

You're effectively proposing the deaths of countless civilians for next to no gain.
 
yea all those deaths aren't bad at all...




Aside from his fervent Israel support, he has been a reasonable addition to the senate.

I am kind of scratching my head at lines like “they killed 11 people” when those “people” are a part of a brutal cartel organization that lead to the deaths of 100,000+ Americans every year.

Not only is this a good move, I’d like to see more of it. We need to stem the tide of drugs coming into America.
 
I want this as a poster

G0E7lrtWgAAVDe1
 
Aside from his fervent Israel support, he has been a reasonable addition to the senate.

I am kind of scratching my head at lines like “they killed 11 people” when those “people” are a part of a brutal cartel organization that lead to the deaths of 100,000+ Americans every year.

Not only is this a good move, I’d like to see more of it. We need to stem the tide of drugs coming into America.

How do we know any of this is true? (other than 11 people were killed and a boat was sunk)

How do we know they were smuggling drugs? How do we know they were going to the US? How do we know all 11 people on the boat were cartel members? How do we even know what cartel they were a part of? Since when is the penalty for drug smuggling death without trial?
 
How do we know any of this is true? (other than 11 people were killed and a boat was sunk)

How do we know they were smuggling drugs? How do we know they were going to the US? How do we know all 11 people on the boat were cartel members? How do we even know what cartel they were a part of? Since when is the penalty for drug smuggling death without trial?
If you apply this logic, how do we know anything that the government says is true or not? I’m also happy to not believe anything the government says in regard to anything.

I don’t believe Israel when they say that a Hamas agent was hiding in a hospital. I don’t believe that every single police arrest was because the person was doing something wrong. I don’t believe that the government ever tells the truth.

I’m glad we’re currently on the same side.
 
If you apply this logic, how do we know anything that the government says is true or not? I’m also happy to not believe anything the government says in regard to anything.

I don’t believe Israel when they say that a Hamas agent was hiding in a hospital. I don’t believe that every single police arrest was because the person was doing something wrong. I don’t believe that the government ever tells the truth.

I’m glad we’re currently on the same side.

This is a false equivalence and dishonest, there's a big difference between taking the government's word for something with evidence and just taking the government's word for something because they said so.

Nothing has been provided to prove any of their claims with this attack and your response still avoids the last question.

Since when is the penalty for drug smuggling death without trial?
 
Last edited:
This is a false equivalence and dishonest, there's a big difference between taking the government's word for something with evidence and just taking the government's word for something because they said so.

Nothing has been provided to prove any of their claims with this attack and your response still avoids the last question.

Since when is the penalty for drug smuggling death without trial?
It’s a false equivalency to question whether a drone strike that took out a group of people really hit “terrorists” being the same as a strike that took out a boat of what we now label terrorists?

Down with Big G man! I’m glad we’re on the same team. They lie constantly.
 
It’s a false equivalency to question whether a drone strike that took out a group of people really hit “terrorists” being the same as a strike that took out a boat of what we now label terrorists?

Down with Big G man! I’m glad we’re on the same team. They lie constantly.

I accept your concession.
 
Back
Top