This reminds me of something I was looking at about Dickens and my favorite Christmas tale, A Christmas Carol. Like most people I always was under the impression that Ebenezer Scrooge represented the wealthy class, but he doesn't. He represents the middle class. This was mindblowing to me because it makes his backstory of how he became a greedy miser over the years even MORE tragic and made him a more sympathetic character to me, whereas I used to think of him as an embodiment of greed. But realistically, in Englad in his day, who were the wealthy? The wealthy are absent from the tale as they are absent from the daily lives of citizens. The Royals, the legislators. You dont even see them, just their effect on the classes.
Scrooge is a small business owner. So small he only has one employee and himself puts in long hours. Scrooge has poverty trauma not from being very poor, but from the idea that marrying the woman he loves would bankrupt him. So he focuses his entire being on financial security. He becomes the model of frugality often regailed by modern conservative thought. He saves all his money, denies himself the fruits of his labors, indulges in no simple merriment that would just be a waste of money (though many modern people who tout this as the way to be do buy themselves their pleasures and vices, but look down on poor people who do). And he had success, on paper. Although he is isolated, has alienated his loved ones, and is shown he will die alone and unloved. "He worked hard."
Bob Cratchit is the true representation of the working poor. Works just as long and as hard as Scrooge, but it afforded only a percentage of the spoils. And come to think of it what is the one thing he desires most of all despite barely being able to feed and house his Family? Well lookie here, its health care for Tiny Tim. Then there's those in abject poverty, the Family under the bridge...the people subject to the work houses and treadmills that Scrooge recommends they seek out, supported by his tax dollars, without knowing what those institutions are like because they're not better invested in.
When I look at those charts, and the hours vs the perceived financial success of the salaries, it makes me think the medical boards make an army of Ebenezer Scrooges out of most Doctors.