Uncircumcised vs. circumcised

No, I comprehended you just fine.

Apparently, there is a significant difference between genital mutilation between the sexes.

You don't have a logical leg to stand on. Your idea is that you were circumcised and you're fine with it.

My idea is that no one should be able to make that decision for someone else.

Now.

Explain to the class, please, why you disagree?

Show me dat logic I'm so afraid of.
Parents should stop feeding and caring for their babies since the babies have no voice in the matter.
 
What in God happened to the Mayberry?
It's a forum filled with a bunch of schlubs with anxiety/depression/other emotional problems. Of course you're going to see a bunch of posters trying to validate themselves with the most trivial nonsense like foreskin, tipping and "how much is too much ketchup on your steak?"
 
You guys keep parroting this, but what good is that extra sensitivity? All that does is make sex short... Its not like men need any more things shortening the lifespan of sex.. Considering it takes a hell of a lot longer for a chick to climax then a dude..

Being extra sensitive is not a boon. Unless you have no desire to make your partner climax, and only care about your own.


This kind of argument carries an implicit logic presupposing that experiencing carnal pleasures is like a 'switch', that is either on or off. Obviously, this isn't the case.

I theorize that the marked undercurrent of mania and general agitation circumcised men often display in other areas of life is due in part to their undermined ability to acquire sexual satisfaction.
 
Parents should stop feeding and caring for their babies since the babies have no voice in the matter.

Yes. Clearly feeding a dependent child and mutilating their genitals are the exact same thing.

You got me.
 
This kind of argument carries an implicit logic presupposing that experiencing carnal pleasures is like a 'switch', that is either on or off. Obviously, this isn't the case.

I theorize that the marked undercurrent of mania and general agitation circumcised men often display in other areas of life is due in part to their undermined ability to acquire sexual satisfaction.

Lol do you look at an agitated guy then unzip his pants to find "yup, just as I thought......circumcised"?
 
This thread is delivering.

I left Sherdog for awhile, but it appears that it is coming back to life again. Lots of new blood and strange characters have come on to the scene.

I back.
 
You know, there are other ways to ensure a woman has pleasurable sexual experience other than chopping some skin off your dick.

Some of you need to broaden your horizons.

And wash your dicks. A circumcision isn't a substitute for hygiene you dirty fucks.
 
How about a good tale of a boy that had to be circumcised.

He was born with a rare medical condition that left him with no eyelids. The foreskin and your eyelids are nearly the same thickness thus the doctors told the parents, we must circumcise your son. The mother of the child immediately threw a tantrum shouting it's not your choice to determine his gender he will do that when he is ready! But if you must circumcise him to let him see that day do it.

The surgery went perfect, he's a little cock eyed but he's just fine.
 
It's a forum filled with a bunch of schlubs with anxiety/depression/other emotional problems. Of course you're going to see a bunch of posters trying to validate themselves with the most trivial nonsense like foreskin, tipping and "how much is too much ketchup on your steak?"

Nah, it's fun to watch insecure men bickering!

Listen to you snotty dandy's positioning yourselves above everyone. Are you guy's wearing your top hats and monocles?

The irony.
 
Back
Top