International UK 'opens floodgates' to Palestinian 'refugees' after court gives Gazans right to settle in Britain

whats the matter, can't handle the truth? you actually think you lot were spreading peace and love in your colonies?

go back to watching your wallpapers of retard libs crying cause of brexit.

reality is, UK is fucked - you are left with 1 or 2 allies on the world stage, one of which is US (meaning, you cant really count on Trump and his billionaire pals to come to your rescue).


its always the same with you right wingers - call everyone you disagree with a retard liberal , but when it turns out the person you are arguing with isnt a liberal you are left without any ammo.
I aint a liberal nor do I care about them. Like I dont care about dumb right wingers. Also stop illegal immigration - easiest way to do that is to stop interfering into other countries governments - but you couldnt help yourself and you had to follow US when they started the whole Arab spring which led to this massive immigration from middle east
just because of the arab spring or any other conflict does not mean you have to open your door to everyone who comes knocking. Mass immigration only happened because of open door policy. Never would have happened if they dealt with illegal immigrants like poland does.
 
civilization <lmao>
execution-by-cannon-photos-07.webp


you were fucking leeches that exploited colonies for their resources - railways your slaves built around the world were used for faster resources extraction, not cause of fucking good will.

And if you havent figured it out yet dumby, I aint crying cause UK is getting overrun by muslims or cause your economy is in the toilet.

what goes around, comes around.

That's a photo of a criminal or state rebel getting punished in 19th century Persia under the Iranian monarchy. Whitey didn't do that. The British didn't even invent cannon punishment, but Persia and Afghanistan used it liberally against their own civilians. Kind of a microcosm of the level of care / research you put into your posts don't you think.
 
49% of UK population is OK with being rear ended as long as the other 51% gets rear ended as well?
Hmm the sodomy ratio is still in our favor, we should say yes

Say yes
 
The Pallies are fucking despised everywhere they go because they are nothing but trouble for any society they land in - FACT. There's a reason not a single neighbouring Muslim country will take them in. They know their true nature.

This will just fast-track Reform UK to power and to be honest, the more time passes the less against that I'm becoming.

Bruh, that’s why you should be opposed to Netanyahu and Trump’s plan. I supported Israel in defeating Hamas but it’s not our responsibility to take in all the refugees.
 
My little anecdotal take of Gazan refugees not being welcome in ME nations.

Dubai is very westernized in many ways, but Euro influenced not American. There are so many Euros living there, who have a long history in dealing with gypsies. I've often heard Palestinians described as Muslim gypsies whenever the subject of refugees came up and why no one in the UAE wants them.
 
Israel can't take any of them so it's better other countries take the burden to protect Israel at all costs.
 
That's a photo of a criminal or state rebel getting punished in 19th century Persia under the Iranian monarchy. Whitey didn't do that. The British didn't even invent cannon punishment, but Persia and Afghanistan used it liberally against their own civilians. Kind of a microcosm of the level of care / research you put into your posts don't you think.
congrats, you know how to reverse google image search
unfortunately, you didn't finish the job

"whitey" did indeed do that - both the brits and portuguese used this method of public execution in their colonies:

real "civilized" way of treating people in other countries, dont you think?
 
Last edited:
congrats, you know how to reverse google image search
unfortunately, you didn't finish the job

"whitey" did indeed do that - both the brits and portuguese used this method of public execution in their colonies:

real "civilized" way of treating people in other countries, dont you think?

I find it ironic that you're so lazy you ended up posting a photo of Muslims punishing Muslims in a thread where you think British people deserved getting punished by Muslims. It's almost like all races were assholes in history and your point is meaningless. You self-owned.

BTW the Portuguese invented it. The British used it to punish deserters and war criminals. The Afghans and Persians used it against their own civilians. Spot the difference.
 
I find it ironic that you're so lazy you ended up posting a photo of Muslims punishing Muslims in a thread where you think British people deserved getting punished by Muslims. It's almost like all races were assholes in history and your point is meaningless. You self-owned.

BTW the Portuguese invented it. The British used it to punish deserters and war criminals. The Afghans and Persians used it against their own civilians. Spot the difference.
youre arguing semantics - photo origin doesnt negate the fact that brits used this method as well.

the only thing that matters is that british (aka "whitey") used this form of execution in their colonies - the poster I replied to, wrote that britain spread civilization (which is laughable really).

yes, afghans and persians used it against their own people - that doesnt make it OK for brits to do the same to afghans and indians (you can label them as deserters and war criminals all you want if it makes you feel any better).

yes, you can find examples of all races being assholes - but brits really take the cake in the last 400+ years (ever since east india company) and fucking up half of the known world.
I don't think you deserve to get punished by muslims, but you got no one else to blame but yourselves for getting into this mess.
 
youre arguing semantics - photo origin doesnt negate the fact that brits used this method as well.

the only thing that matters is that british (aka "whitey") used this form of execution in their colonies - the poster I replied to, wrote that britain spread civilization (which is laughable really).

yes, afghans and persians used it against their own people - that doesnt make it OK for brits to do the same to afghans and indians (you can label them as deserters and war criminals all you want if it makes you feel any better).

yes, you can find examples of all races being assholes - but brits really take the cake in the last 400+ years (ever since east india company) and fucking up half of the known world.
I don't think you deserve to get punished by muslims, but you got no one else to blame but yourselves for getting into this mess.
Try living in 2025 and not the 1600s buddy

Your life might benefit from it
 
youre arguing semantics - photo origin doesnt negate the fact that brits used this method as well.

the only thing that matters is that british (aka "whitey") used this form of execution in their colonies - the poster I replied to, wrote that britain spread civilization (which is laughable really).

yes, afghans and persians used it against their own people - that doesnt make it OK for brits to do the same to afghans and indians (you can label them as deserters and war criminals all you want if it makes you feel any better).

yes, you can find examples of all races being assholes - but brits really take the cake in the last 400+ years (ever since east india company) and fucking up half of the known world.
I don't think you deserve to get punished by muslims, but you got no one else to blame but yourselves for getting into this mess.

Countries that were under British rule are much better off now than countries that were colonised by other empires, and often better off than they were before British rule. To say the British civilised many nations is historical fact, although it's cool to deny it for some.

Also, you're a leftist.
 
Also, you're a leftist.

I am:
- for guns
- for choice
- against illegal immigration (and any immigrants that commit crimes, should be returned to their country of origin)
- against rich countries meddling in other countries governments
- for separation of church and state
- for taxing the billionaires thru their nose (and against billionaires in governments)
- for unions
- for universal healthcare

Yes, british "civilized" the shit out of 10+ african nations you colonised + Burma, Papua New Guinea - they are so much "better off" now, that no one in their right mind would want to live in them (I guess maybe Kenya and Hong Kong are exceptions). Rest of your former colonies flourished after you went the fuck away (Singapore, Malaysia, Ireland, Canada, US).
Not to mention how you are responsible for fucking up the middle east after WW2, with conflicts that are still ongoing today.
You only spread civilization in the form of your railways (so you can extract natural resources faster) and english language (so you can communicate more easily with your slaves). British were leeches everywhere they went (I mean some other european nations were as well, but you colonised the largest number of nations).
But the important thing is that you beat Argentina and gained back control over Falkland islands - money well spent.
You can shove your facts up your ass.
 
Last edited:
I am:
- for guns
- for choice
- against illegal immigration (and any immigrants that commit crimes, should be returned to their country of origin)
- against rich countries meddling in other countries governments
- for separation of church and state
- for taxing the billionaires thru their nose (and against billionaires in governments)
- for unions
- for universal healthcare

Yes, british "civilized" the shit out of 10+ african nations you colonised + Burma, Papua New Guinea - they are so much "better off" now, that no one in their right mind would want to live in them (I guess maybe Kenya and Hong Kong are exceptions). Rest of your former colonies flourished after you went the fuck away (Singapore, Malaysia, Ireland, Canada, US).
Not to mention how you are responsible for fucking up the middle east after WW2, with conflicts that are still ongoing today.
You only spread civilization in the form of your railways (so you can extract natural resources faster) and english language (so you can communicate more easily with your slaves). British were leeches everywhere they went (I mean some other european nations were as well, but you colonised the largest number of nations).
But the important thing is that you beat Argentina and gained back control over Falkland islands - money well spent.
You can shove your facts up your ass.
You’re a bitter, angry little man
 
Sausage sandwiches are very popular in the UK, it's not just Palestine, it's basically any war zone that might have a population in the UK......

So basically anywhere.....
 
Yes, british "civilized" the shit out of 10+ african nations you colonised

They absolutely are, yes. Those "nations" were nothing but mud hut villages before the British arrived.

Papua New Guinea

Please explain to me what was going on in PNG before the British arrived. Thanks.

(I guess maybe Kenya and Hong Kong are exceptions). Rest of your former colonies flourished after you went the fuck away (Singapore, Malaysia, Ireland, Canada, US).

You've literally just countered your own argument... you claim ex-Brit colonies are a mess today... then name EXTREMELY successful countries: Singapore, Malaysia, Ireland, Canada and US. And on top of that, the very successful Hong Kong. And arguably the most successful country in Africa: Kenya. Thanks for proving my point. 👍

<Dany07>

Not to mention how you are responsible for fucking up the middle east after WW2

Negative. ME was a mess before the British arrived, or any Europeans for that matter.

You only spread civilization in the form of your railways (so you can extract natural resources faster) and english language (so you can communicate more easily with your slaves).

You debunked this above. lol

You can shove your facts up your ass.

You are one angry little goof.
 
Back
Top