UFC Fight Night: Burns vs. Brady

What's the thought on Gabriel Santos and Rong Zhu itd? I feel like they've got great matchups where they should be in control and have a massive edge on the feet compared to their foes, and it might translate into a TKO.

Gabe got a rough start with getting robbed against Murphy and then caught by Onama, but I still think he's a quality guy and will be looking to showcase that in a do-or-die situation.

With Rong Zhu on the other hand I'm mostly fading Padilla. Maybe I shouldn't since he sprung a big upset in his last one, but I kinda feel like he's a Khama Worthy type regional fighter in that he might cash as an underdog once or twice, but will inevitably end up getting blown up in a few fights and cut.
Gabriel Santos puts it on hard. I think he's levels higher.

Zhu has decent tdd , it depends heavy on his ability to stay on his feet.

Zhu has like 4 sub losses, not safe enough for me if he gets taken down and Padilla starts looking for chokes. Maybe the under and over have worth but I'm expecting some close odds.
 
Gabriel Santos puts it on hard. I think he's levels higher.

Zhu has decent tdd , it depends heavy on his ability to stay on his feet.

Zhu has like 4 sub losses, not safe enough for me if he gets taken down and Padilla starts looking for chokes. Maybe the under and over have worth but I'm expecting some close odds.
What makes you think Zhu has decent TDD? He has 2 armbars from guard recently that came form him getting taken down with ease. Kim also took him down in round 1 and took his back.
 
Another underdog I like Is Felipe Dos Santos (+160)

I watched both of their recent fights, and Felipe is way better. I understand why he opened as a slight favorite. They also opened Burns at -110. Lots of money to be made this week fading the public
 
What makes you think Zhu has decent TDD? He has 2 armbars from guard recently that came form him getting taken down with ease. Kim also took him down in round 1 and took his back.
2 of 6 and 4 of 25 where his tdd stats

not saying it’s good, but it’s at decent range. his last opponent was a wrestler .

It’s a dangerous fight if he slips up and gets subbed. But he does find himself up to his feet in some of those fights. And Taco isn’t that good a striker. his two last losses where guys with multiple sub losses, so i question his ability to get the job done here.
 
Durden vs Schnell now. Matt going to sleep is still the likeliest outcome, but he does have a better chance to win here if it hits the mat.
 
2 of 6 and 4 of 25 where his tdd stats

not saying it’s good, but it’s at decent range. his last opponent was a wrestler .

It’s a dangerous fight if he slips up and gets subbed. But he does find himself up to his feet in some of those fights. And Taco isn’t that good a striker. his two last losses where guys with multiple sub losses, so i question his ability to get the job done here.
He got choked out by Bahamondes who’s a striker. Bahamondes never submitted anyone. Taco by SUB is the play. The Road to UFC are all mostly fighters who never wrestled in their life
 
He got choked out by Bahamondes who’s a striker. Bahamondes never submitted anyone. Taco by SUB is the play. The Road to UFC are all mostly fighters who never wrestled in their life
like i didn’t bring up the sub threat.

He got choked after he got rocked, its different than getting taken down and subbed.
 
I think you either are using inaccurate wording or don't really know what you're saying. How do you differentiate "value" from "putting your money in a strong position to win"?

I'm honestly not trying to be a dick here, but you realize that these are inherently the same thing right? Betting lines that have value IS a disciplined approach to betting. Doesn't mean you risk huge amounts on all of them of course.

If you aren't looking for value when placing bets...what exactly are you looking for??? It's not a loaded question, I'm genuinely perplexed.
Agree 100% and this is gambling 101.

Give me +100 bets that have 51% of hitting and I'll be a billionarie in some time.
 
Another underdog I like Is Felipe Dos Santos (+160)

I watched both of their recent fights, and Felipe is way better. I understand why he opened as a slight favorite. They also opened Burns at -110. Lots of money to be made this week fading the public
I think this is a great card for underdogs.

So far I like

Lipe + 160
Burns + 150
Demopolous +300
Andrade +230
Budka +250
Padilla +230
 
Cody Durden in to face Matt Schnell. I think he’s coming back way too quick from that brutal KO.
 
I think you either are using inaccurate wording or don't really know what you're saying. How do you differentiate "value" from "putting your money in a strong position to win"?

I'm honestly not trying to be a dick here, but you realize that these are inherently the same thing right? Betting lines that have value IS a disciplined approach to betting. Doesn't mean you risk huge amounts on all of them of course.

If you aren't looking for value when placing bets...what exactly are you looking for??? It's not a loaded question, I'm genuinely perplexed.

My 2 cents here, I learned from a genius, if you think there is a value on a line if they do X but you´re uncertain if they do X or if they come out as Y version, then it may be smart to pass.

LIke maybe you think X fighter can look like a -200, but you also think they could look like +500. You´re not sure, so you avoid betting the +150 simply because you dont know what version of the fighter you´ll get. You´re not sure if its a value bet.

While other times you may handicap another fighter as -200 but you´re much more confident that they´ll show up as the -200 version.

Maybe this doesn´t make sense, as yes value is what its about, the more +EV bets the better (as long as they are +EV), but sometimes we dont know what version of a fighter we´ll see.

I think Kevin Holland is a good example, the guy has potential, he´s skilled, but you´re not sure if he´ll be serious or just fk around and lose a sparring match.

But ofc at the core its all about making +EV bets without going broke.
 
My 2 cents here, I learned from a genius, if you think there is a value on a line if they do X but you´re uncertain if they do X or if they come out as Y version, then it may be smart to pass.

LIke maybe you think X fighter can look like a -200, but you also think they could look like +500. You´re not sure, so you avoid betting the +150 simply because you dont know what version of the fighter you´ll get. You´re not sure if its a value bet.

While other times you may handicap another fighter as -200 but you´re much more confident that they´ll show up as the -200 version.

Maybe this doesn´t make sense, as yes value is what its about, the more +EV bets the better (as long as they are +EV), but sometimes we dont know what version of a fighter we´ll see.

I think Kevin Holland is a good example, the guy has potential, he´s skilled, but you´re not sure if he´ll be serious or just fk around and lose a sparring match.

But ofc at the core its all about making +EV bets without going broke.

I get what you're saying, I think you need to bake all of that into how you cap a fight. "If fighter A fights at his best, he will look like -400 no matter what his opponent does. But fighter A is a flake and only fights at his best about 2/3 of his fights. So I need to weigh how much better he is at his best and also factor in that there's a reasonable chance he won't look his best. What does the fight look like then?" Coming up with your own EV means trying to factor all of these things imo.

And for some fights, absolutely it's easier than others. Fighters who consistently look the same are easier to cap, no question.
 
Brady’s nose looks broken, is this why he has below average cardio?
 
Cody Durden in to face Matt Schnell. I think he’s coming back way too quick from that brutal KO.
Agreed, plus short notice as well, Durden's gassed before and if he can't sleep Schnell I don't see him covering this line.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,247,513
Messages
56,200,039
Members
175,107
Latest member
rofboxing
Back
Top