Its still at 1.36 on my bookI’d prefer FDGTD 1.50. Paying 0.06 for covering both subs.
Suprised honestly the odds have gone from 1.36 to 1.50. I thought it’d be lined around 1.25 or so. Small cage and both fights ended inside the distance, yes maybe cormier was on his way to a dec, but still I would not play 2.50 for decision, way too low.
are u trying to get better odds on souza? where is your source? whop said when and where? if you don't go into further details then better shut upRumor in here Brazil that Livinha is going to fight injured. If news i put here...
Tbf someone said something like this about Matt Mitrione not taking Timothy Johnson seriously in last week's Bellator thread and they ended up being correct (Mitrione usually comes in at 250ish, last fight he came in 265+)are u trying to get better odds on souza? where is your source? whop said when and where? if you don't go into further details then better shut up
Its still at 1.36 on my book
Do we not have an official bets thread? Trying to tail @Sadistics over here wtfff
Second that. Sadistics is very generous being a big shot, still so humble, sharing bets, and all his wisdom and knowlegde. One of the best guys around both as a bettor and as a human being. Perfect contradiction to the name actually.
But to anyone just blindly tailing him beware not betting it down too low, as sadistics gets crazy good lines often, might only want to do a few of the plays or at least not just blindly bet 100% of the bets all the time, I´´m sure you know that TrueAscension, this is more for all the lurkers etc. As there may be no value left on some of the lines,or he may only have taken a stab at some plays due to odds getting too out of line. If I were to follow completely then might be a good idea to either use it for confidence/guidelines - or bet proportionate, so if he makes 1600 dollar and 300 dollar bets, then i.e bet 160, and 30, or turn it to percentages of your bankroll etc.
For the record I also think there's some value in Felice as a moderate-heavy dog since she's generally pretty scrambly, has decent enough TDD, solid top game and a the better striking, but not a ton since Michelle Waterson took her down and held here there without too much issue. Fight Goes To Decision at -205 seems pretty safe since I can't see Felice getting subbed, but I also don't play lines that steep so won't be something I personally get on
And as I put in the Futures thread I'm big on Dodson - Strong enough wrestler that he should be able to nullify Merab's wrestling, doesn't have cardio issues, and should be able to beat Merab on the feet pretty easily through having an actual striking game (and a fuckton of power)
So I taped the Chris Daukaus v Parker Porter fight and uhhhh... Yeah. It's a standard Heavyweight shitshow
Snipped......
is there a site out there that predicts line movement/ who the money is coming in on?
God I really hate this card for betting. Might just lay all my money I would've spent on this card on Stipe. I don't see how DC wins here unless Stipe acts as timid as he did for most of pt 2.
100%. Burns is too green to play at these odds in my opinion. Pineda is a real veteran I think he is better everywhere minus maybe the straight sub game. But even there he is the same as Burns, has a very dangerous guard.Anyone else think Daniel Pineda might be worth a stab?
The guy clearly does not give a fuck. Popped for steroids in the fucking PFL, will go to ground with fighters who are clearly better down there than he is, clear power given what he did to Movlid Khaybulaev (and ridiculous handspeed too). While most fighters who struggle with Herbert Burns on the feet do so because they're worried about his ground game and therefore keeping it on the feet (becoming tentative because they're wary of giving up a takedown, which keeps their hands too low, which gets them knocked down/out), the fact that Pineda straight up does not care about his grappling credentials may well be a blessing in disguise which gets him the win on the feet
Admittedly got the idea on this one from @Gugabe's latest write-up, but watching Pineda's tape it feels like people are writing him off for what he used to be rather than what he is (like fading Robbie Lawler on his return to the UFC because he lost to... Wow, Robbie Lawler's initial UFC losses aged REALLY well)
wow you would think stipe is a 3-1 fav. I like Cormier but I won’t say it’s going to be easy either way. One thing is even though stipe won the last fight he was getting thoroughly dominated until those body shots in round 4. I think cormier mixes it up more in this fight and uses more of his wrestling.
I'd have to disagree that Stipe was getting thoroughly dominated until round 4, although that does seem to be narrative. The only dominant round of the fight was round 1, where DC took him down around the 3:00 mark and kept him there for the rest of the round. Round 2 was very competitive, but still a fairly clear DC round. Round 3 is where the tide started to turn, not round 4. It was a very close round, and I can see arguments for both guys winning it, but two judges scored it for Stipe.
Even if the finish didn't happen, DC had slowed considerably, Stipe was pretty clearly in control of the fight and they would have been headed to round 5 tied on two scorecards.
My view is that 'intelligent Pineda who wants to keep it standing' could look like a hindsight -300 here, but I have a gutfeel that he is going to go full retard too often to make him playable beyond a small stab.Anyone else think Daniel Pineda might be worth a stab?
The guy clearly does not give a fuck. Popped for steroids in the fucking PFL, will go to ground with fighters who are clearly better down there than he is, clear power given what he did to Movlid Khaybulaev (and ridiculous handspeed too). While most fighters who struggle with Herbert Burns on the feet do so because they're worried about his ground game and therefore keeping it on the feet (becoming tentative because they're wary of giving up a takedown, which keeps their hands too low, which gets them knocked down/out), the fact that Pineda straight up does not care about his grappling credentials may well be a blessing in disguise which gets him the win on the feet
Admittedly got the idea on this one from @Gugabe's latest write-up, but watching Pineda's tape it feels like people are writing him off for what he used to be rather than what he is (like fading Robbie Lawler on his return to the UFC because he lost to... Wow, Robbie Lawler's initial UFC losses aged REALLY well)
100%. Burns is too green to play at these odds in my opinion. Pineda is a real veteran I think he is better everywhere minus maybe the straight sub game. But even there he is the same as Burns, has a very dangerous guard.
I'd have to disagree that Stipe was getting thoroughly dominated until round 4, although that does seem to be narrative. The only dominant round of the fight was round 1, where DC took him down around the 3:00 mark and kept him there for the rest of the round. Round 2 was very competitive, but still a fairly clear DC round. Round 3 is where the tide started to turn, not round 4. It was a very close round, and I can see arguments for both guys winning it, but two judges scored it for Stipe.
Even if the finish didn't happen, DC had slowed considerably, Stipe was pretty clearly in control of the fight and they would have been headed to round 5 tied on two scorecards.