U.S. report on Russian hacking released.

I only have one question. Aside from the purely illegal action of hacking in general, how is Russian action on influencing opinion on the election substantially different than accepting foreign governmental financing or financing from foreign nationals to help finance an election campaign? Aren't both technically foreign influence working to effect an outcome they desire in a government not their own?
Because narrative.
 
If @IDL drew similar conclusions with the same level of evidence you guys would run a troll-train on him for pages.

Bozhe moi, the entire piece pins this entire conspiracy to RT, lol

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3254229-ICA-2017-01.html#
Right? Is their logic supposed to be:

A. RT Exists
B. RT is tied to Kremlin and wanted Trump to win
C. Therefore RT hacked the DNC

???

What they fuck are they thinking? Do they really think we are this stupid?
 
Sorry, what? Russia Today hacked the DNC?
Don't be naive. Russian Television hacked YOU!
VyQyyZ.gif
 
I saw the talking point coming. Look the moron right above your post made the exact same dumb point.
So you saw the narrative coming, that is why you wondered why people were questioning the link? Sounds like you thought the link was questionable to begin with.
 
So you saw the narrative coming, that is why you wondered why people were questioning the link? Sounds like you thought the link was questionable to begin with.

Wrong.

I know how you retards think.

The RT link is more than enough evidence to prove direct interference by Putin.

Not only that, there's undoubtedly more that they can't show.

There is no way the NSA, FBI and CIA put their name on this report without the evidence being overwhelming.

No fucking way.
 
Wrong.

I know how you retards think.

The RT link is more than enough evidence to prove direct interference by Putin.

Not only that, there's undoubtedly more that they can't show.

There is no way the NSA, FBI and CIA put their name on this report without the evidence being overwhelming.

No fucking way.
RT having a bias <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CNN colluding with Clinton campaign.

I can't believe people hug the nuts of MSM so hard they can't see the forest for the trees.
 
If @IDL drew similar conclusions with the same level of evidence you guys would run a troll-train on him for pages.

Bozhe moi, the entire piece pins this entire conspiracy to RT, lol

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3254229-ICA-2017-01.html#
1) We dont know what evidence the intelligence community is relying on. The report hints at it, but they are not going to give up classified info.

2) Is there a reason we should think the conclusions of IDL are on par with the conclusions of the CIA, FBI, and NSA? Do they have all have similar expertise and/or access to privileged information? Are you able to distinguish between a CT nutter on sherdog and the US intelligence community?
 
RT having a bias <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CNN colluding with Clinton campaign.

No, you unbelievable moron.

RT does not have a bias, you dumb fuck.

They are state run russian media.

They are the propaganda appendage of V. Putin.

If they report something he doesn't like, he kills them. Literally he has done that.
 
1) We dont know what evidence the intelligence community is relying on. The report hints at it, but they are not going to give up classified info.

2) Is there a reason we should think the conclusions of IDL are on part with the conclusions of the CIA, FBI, and NSA? Do they have all have similar expertise and/or access to privileged information? Are you able to distinguish between a CT nutter on sherdog and the US intelligence community?

Good point and I agree IDL is more trustworthy then the UD intel community
 
Yeah, if this is the best our 17 intelligence agencies can do, we are really wasting tax payer money.

The CIA doesnt generally give out details on their operations to the public. Most intelligence agencies dont actually.

Try to find out some details on current mossad operations. They dont release a ton of details. For some unknowaboe reason.
 
1) We dont know what evidence the intelligence community is relying on. The report hints at it, but they are not going to give up classified info.

2) Is there a reason we should think the conclusions of IDL are on par with the conclusions of the CIA, FBI, and NSA? Do they have all have similar expertise and/or access to privileged information? Are you able to distinguish between a CT nutter on sherdog and the US intelligence community?

If people could distinguish between conspiracy nutters and large communities of experts, then sherdog would be a very different place.
 
The CIA doesnt generally give out details on their operations to the public. Most intelligence agencies dont actually.

Try to find out some details on current mossad operations. They dont release a ton of details. For some unknowaboe reason.
But this was supposed to be the proof to shut Donald Trump up!

All we get are reports of "Didn't you know RT is owned by the Russians!!!"

Pathetic!
 
Even if true: They undermined faith in the democratic process by showing that there was collusion in the democratic process.

Quick! Someone shoot the messenger!

I mean, if I tell North Koreans that Kim Jong Un isn't the tallest man in the world am I doing something wrong? If it was the Russians, they have my thanks!

Let's say it's true. That's espionage, plain and simple. Do you not think that's something that should be addressed somehow?
 
1) We dont know what evidence the intelligence community is relying on. The report hints at it, but they are not going to give up classified info.
The report is a 10p. freshman book report on RT.com.

2) Is there a reason we should think the conclusions of IDL are on par with the conclusions of the CIA, FBI, and NSA? Do they have all have similar expertise and/or access to privileged information? Are you able to distinguish between a CT nutter on sherdog and the US intelligence community?
Is there a reason you are so quick to accept somebody's word for something without evidence? Are you not a little bewildered as to why they would release THIS report with such fanfare only to have it be a critique of RT.com?
 
Back
Top