- Joined
- Nov 5, 2016
- Messages
- 1,293
- Reaction score
- 0
By some you must mean me, yeah?
I saw the talking point coming. Look the moron right above your post made the exact same dumb point.
By some you must mean me, yeah?
Because narrative.I only have one question. Aside from the purely illegal action of hacking in general, how is Russian action on influencing opinion on the election substantially different than accepting foreign governmental financing or financing from foreign nationals to help finance an election campaign? Aren't both technically foreign influence working to effect an outcome they desire in a government not their own?
Right? Is their logic supposed to be:If @IDL drew similar conclusions with the same level of evidence you guys would run a troll-train on him for pages.
Bozhe moi, the entire piece pins this entire conspiracy to RT, lol
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3254229-ICA-2017-01.html#
Don't be naive. Russian Television hacked YOU!Sorry, what? Russia Today hacked the DNC?
Yeah, if this is the best our 17 intelligence agencies can do, we are really wasting tax payer money.Sorry, what? Russia Today hacked the DNC?
Yes.Do they really think we are this stupid?
What's even funnier is people at CNN and the TS are going to gloat about this as "PROOF!!!!!!!1111111one"Yes.
So you saw the narrative coming, that is why you wondered why people were questioning the link? Sounds like you thought the link was questionable to begin with.I saw the talking point coming. Look the moron right above your post made the exact same dumb point.
Yeah, if this is the best our 17 intelligence agencies can do, we are really wasting tax payer money.
So you saw the narrative coming, that is why you wondered why people were questioning the link? Sounds like you thought the link was questionable to begin with.
RT having a bias <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CNN colluding with Clinton campaign.Wrong.
I know how you retards think.
The RT link is more than enough evidence to prove direct interference by Putin.
Not only that, there's undoubtedly more that they can't show.
There is no way the NSA, FBI and CIA put their name on this report without the evidence being overwhelming.
No fucking way.
1) We dont know what evidence the intelligence community is relying on. The report hints at it, but they are not going to give up classified info.If @IDL drew similar conclusions with the same level of evidence you guys would run a troll-train on him for pages.
Bozhe moi, the entire piece pins this entire conspiracy to RT, lol
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3254229-ICA-2017-01.html#
RT having a bias <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CNN colluding with Clinton campaign.
1) We dont know what evidence the intelligence community is relying on. The report hints at it, but they are not going to give up classified info.
2) Is there a reason we should think the conclusions of IDL are on part with the conclusions of the CIA, FBI, and NSA? Do they have all have similar expertise and/or access to privileged information? Are you able to distinguish between a CT nutter on sherdog and the US intelligence community?
Spoken like a true Trump supporter.Good point and I agree IDL is more trustworthy then the UD intel community
Yeah, if this is the best our 17 intelligence agencies can do, we are really wasting tax payer money.
1) We dont know what evidence the intelligence community is relying on. The report hints at it, but they are not going to give up classified info.
2) Is there a reason we should think the conclusions of IDL are on par with the conclusions of the CIA, FBI, and NSA? Do they have all have similar expertise and/or access to privileged information? Are you able to distinguish between a CT nutter on sherdog and the US intelligence community?
But this was supposed to be the proof to shut Donald Trump up!The CIA doesnt generally give out details on their operations to the public. Most intelligence agencies dont actually.
Try to find out some details on current mossad operations. They dont release a ton of details. For some unknowaboe reason.
Even if true: They undermined faith in the democratic process by showing that there was collusion in the democratic process.
Quick! Someone shoot the messenger!
I mean, if I tell North Koreans that Kim Jong Un isn't the tallest man in the world am I doing something wrong? If it was the Russians, they have my thanks!
The report is a 10p. freshman book report on RT.com.1) We dont know what evidence the intelligence community is relying on. The report hints at it, but they are not going to give up classified info.
Is there a reason you are so quick to accept somebody's word for something without evidence? Are you not a little bewildered as to why they would release THIS report with such fanfare only to have it be a critique of RT.com?2) Is there a reason we should think the conclusions of IDL are on par with the conclusions of the CIA, FBI, and NSA? Do they have all have similar expertise and/or access to privileged information? Are you able to distinguish between a CT nutter on sherdog and the US intelligence community?