Trump's Speech to Congress

IMG_2264.jpg


FUCCKCKKK YYYESSSS

now hopefully i can hopefully stop losing tax money to Israel. Fuck globalism, Americans first
 
I didn't read the link before. I've answered you now though.
You didn't answer anything though. You claim you objected to Obama killing an American kid in 2011. Show us then. Don't be scared, homie.
 
He's trying to play ignorant even though I just linked it in a response to him in this very thread.

I can't comment on his position, but it's just easier to simply ask someone their position, and if you think it contradicts a previously-held position, you should look it up and cite it.

There's way too much asking people to use the search function on here when you can just ask them straight-up what they believe.
 
IMG_2264.jpg


FUCCKCKKK YYYESSSS

now hopefully i can hopefully stop losing tax money to Israel. Fuck globalism, Americans first
Nationalism? That's racist and Hitler esque!!!
 
I can't comment on his position, but it's just easier to simply ask someone their position, and if you think it contradicts a previously-held position, you should look it up and cite it.

There's way too much asking people to use the search function on here when you can just ask them straight-up what they believe.
Homer is shitting on Trump for the child who died in the Yemen raid. Obama droned an underage American with 0 ties to terrorists back in 2011 (in Yemen, no less). Ole Homer claims he condemned Obama for it yet he won't provide proof for some reason.
 
Homer is shitting on Trump for the child who died in the Yemen raid. Obama droned an underage American with 0 ties to terrorists back in 2011 (in Yemen, no less). Ole Homer claims he condemned Obama for it yet he won't provide proof for some reason.

I hear where you're coming from, but I think it's enough to accept that he condemns Obama now if he claims he does. It's either a concession, or a factual representation of his views. I get wanting to catch someone being inconsistent, but as a general rule, it's an unnecessary complication to having a dialogue with someone to ask them to show you what they said in the past.
 
I hear where you're coming from, but I think it's enough to accept that he condemns Obama now if he claims he does. It's either a concession, or a factual representation of his views. I get wanting to catch someone being inconsistent, but as a general rule, it's an unnecessary complication to having a dialogue with someone to ask them to show you what they said in the past.
He condemns Obama NOW after someone called him out on his hypocrisy. :D
He shouldn't have made the claim if he couldn't back it up.
 
Homer is shitting on Trump for the child who died in the Yemen raid. Obama droned an underage American with 0 ties to terrorists back in 2011 (in Yemen, no less). Ole Homer claims he condemned Obama for it yet he won't provide proof for some reason.
If you read my post, I was actually shitting on his phrase. Also, that is language that all Presidents use. I shit on them all. We're not at war, and we're not protecting our homeland by killing children on the other side of the world.
 
Then he shouldn't have the made the claim (especially since he was on here in 2011).

I'm not really following the specifics, just speaking in general. If he said something that contradicts his supposed-view, then by all means, give 'em hell.
 
Purely anecdotal but I have the same problem. My car is losing value because of all the god damn pot holes that can't be filled fast enough. Ive almost had a few head-ons because people swerve into my lane to miss a catastrophe-hole.

Potholes are a very symbolic issue, but there's so much else crumbling just out of sight. Bridges, dams, water and electrical grids, it's adding up every day. America is a reactionary nation when it comes to maintenance and it will cost much more down the road.
 
How was the speech? Missed it, was it good and Hitler lile? (Not reading through all these posts)
 
How was the speech? Missed it, was it good and Hitler lile? (Not reading through all these posts)
It was a pretty standard Republican state of the union I think. A little extra nationalism, a little less free trade. But he followed the teleprompter, and did not go off topic really.
 
Back
Top