I did a search and nothing came up with you condemning Obama. The ball is in your court.
Then show us, since you were on here when it happened in 2011.
In her defense, virtually every president and statesman since the end of WWII could be brought up on similar charges of war crimes and treason. It's nice that more people are starting to notice now though.
Exactly. Vietnam, Korea, El Salvador, etc into infinity.
Well, I prefer that we shit on her also. Not shitting on the others is the problem.
What specifically in 2011 are you referring to?Then show us, since you were on here when it happened in 2011.
That doesn't say anything about you condemning Obama for killing an American child in 2011. Nice try though.links that are irrelevant
Yikes, just now watching the Democratic rebuttal from Steve Beshear. Pretty weak stuff. Clearly written before he watched the speech.
lolWhat specifically in 2011 are you referring to?
What specifically in 2011 are you referring to?
Al-Baghdadi's son? I condemn that, and believe I have condemned it before.lol
Thanks for proving my point.![]()
lolAl-Baghdadi's son? I condemn that, and believe I have condemned it before.
He didn't ask me a specific question. I'm guessing he's referring to the drone strike on Baghdadi's son? I condemn that. In fact, I condemn all of our drone strikes as extrajudicial killings and war crimes.I see this conversation play out a lot on here, where someone is asked to provide evidence for a particular stance from the past.
The easiest way to solve it is just to plainly ask the person what they think without having to search through someone's posting history.
Just tell the man what you currently believe.
I missed it. Was it a human embodiment of CNN over the last 6 months? Fruitcake parade?
He didn't ask me a specific question. I'm guessing he's referring to the drone strike on Baghdadi's son? I condemn that. In fact, I condemn all of our drone strikes as extrajudicial killings and war crimes.
I asked for clarification, and you never gave it. Look through the posts. I asked if you meant killing children, as in a general principal of war or military action. You're just being an idiot.lol
You claim to have condemned something that you have no clue about until I brought it up.
I even linked it earlier in this thread...
He's trying to play ignorant even though I just linked it in a response to him in this very thread.I see this conversation play out a lot on here, where someone is asked to provide evidence for a particular stance from the past.
The easiest way to solve it is just to plainly ask the person what they think without having to search through someone's posting history.
Just tell the man what you currently believe.
Except I already linked it to you in this very thread...I asked for clarification, and you never gave it. Look through the posts. I asked if you meant killing children, as in a general principal of war or military action. You're just being an idiot.
I didn't read the link before. I've answered you now though.Maybe that child should've had a more responsible father, right?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...the-killing-of-a-16-year-old-american/264028/