• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Trump-Ukraine Megathread V8

Status
Not open for further replies.
Have you heard any comments or discussion at all from the so-called experts and analysts used by the media explaining how exactly the House Democrats are going to convince a significant portion of the House Republicans to vote for impeachment when they are deliberately blocking them from access to the relevant information? All but a handful looking for CNN/MSNBC gigs after retirement just voted to censure Schiff. They are going to vote with Dems on this? It's a farce.
I don't know, maybe because when/if actual impeachment proceedings happen, they'll all be there for the testimony.
 
lol just because you're on one committee doesn't give you the right to lead a gang into another committee's closed-door meetings. Unethical as fuck. He sounds entitled and pulled an attention-whoring stunt.
Their making a point obviously
 
He really said that? Wow, the right is so far gone if they think this. Mind blowing. That is some straight up dictator shit. Please tell me nobody else agrees with this.

100% many here in the war room do agree with it
 
I don't know, maybe because when/if actual impeachment proceedings happen, they'll all be there for the testimony.

When the leadership is already saying that Taylor's testimony was refuted in 90 seconds. The leadership who are cuckservative and anti-Trump and not popular with a huge portion of the GOP Congress.
 
When the leadership is already saying that Taylor's testimony was refuted in 90 seconds. The leadership who are cuckservative and anti-Trump and not popular with a huge portion of the GOP Congress.

Lol at refuted in 90 seconds. The guy placed there by Pompeo and Trump with absolutely no reason to lie. Lemme guess, you agree that Trump could kill someone right?
 
Have you heard any argument at all from the so-called experts and analysts used by the media explaining how exactly the House Democrats are going to convince a significant portion of the House Republicans to vote for impeachment when they are deliberately blocking them from access to the relevant information? All but a handful looking for CNN/MSNBC gigs after retirement just voted to censure Schiff. They are going to vote with Dems on this? It's a farce.
Have you figured out what impeachment is yet?
 
100% many here in the war room do agree with it

I hope they feel the same way when democrats take back the presidency and proceed to do whatever the fuck they want. But I’m sure the privilege only extends to republicans.
 
I hope they feel the same way when democrats take back the presidency and proceed to do whatever the fuck they want. But I’m sure the privilege only extends to republicans.

Luckily Dems don’t act like mob bosses and criminals. They do wear tan suits which is literally Hitler
 
Have you figured out what impeachment is yet?

I've always understood it. You are the one that believes a CNN pundit saying Clinton was impeached means he was impeached by the terms of the Constitution.
 
I've always understood it. You are the one that believes a CNN pundit saying Clinton was impeached means he was impeached by the terms of the Constitution.

Bill Clinton was impeached. Full stop you moron
 
Impeachment definition, process by which a legislative body levels charges against a government official. Impeachment DOES NOT in itself remove the official definitively from office. Impeachment is an indictment

So let’s all point and laugh at @KeepItRealist
 
I've always understood it. You are the one that believes a CNN pundit saying Clinton was impeached means he was impeached by the terms of the Constitution.

<36>

Just take the L and move on man. It’s ok to be wrong, we all are sometimes, but when you double down despite being provably wrong, nobody’s going to take you seriously and you come off as an even bigger idiot.
 
<36>

Just take the L and move on man. It’s ok to be wrong, we all are sometimes, but when you double down despite being provably wrong, nobody’s going to take you seriously and you come off as an even bigger idiot.

It's more like irritation at having to deal with simpletons who know nothing about the Constitution. The same people who believed the Russia Hoax leaks for two years.
 
Last edited:
I've always understood it. You are the one that believes a CNN pundit saying Clinton was impeached means he was impeached by the terms of the Constitution.
I dont know where you're getting CNN from

Can you please cite this mysterious language in the Constitution that states impeachment is more than a charge levied and voted on by the House?

Very curious
 
It's more like irritating at having to deal with simpletons who know nothing about the Constitution. The same people who believed the Russia Hoax leaks for two years.
And yet you steadfastly refuse to show proof of your ignorant assertion
 
I dont know where you're getting CNN from

Can you please cite this mysterious language in the Constitution that states impeachment is more than a charge levied and voted on by the House?

Very curious

I've already said I'm not going to bother repeating myself. I've explained it already.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top