A person with intimate knowledge of the situation might be more credible than random twitter slop?
A person with intimate knowledge of the situation who has every incentive to do what is in her best interests...
Obviously the current admin made some sort of deal for her to get that cushy club fed transfer.
A) she gave them info
B) she promised to do what they wanted
If you are actually arguing in good faith, which you're not, your critical thinking skills would bring you to a logical conclusion
Since this administration has repeatedly lied and got caught lying in the span of weeks regarding this case, from "we have the files and lots of ppl are going down" to "we concluded the investigation and are confident that epstein and Maxwell were the only people involved here" to "the files are a hoax" to "the surveillance footage is unedited"....you get the gist, lots of lies and coverups ontop of coverups.
I mean it's your natural tendency to go with option A, she gave them info because all of a sudden this admin wants to do the right thing now? And I guess they were incompetent and negligent in confidently concluding the investigation is over?
Or Option B ....their coverups failed and led to more public scrutiny, and they are scrambling to cover their bases and one base would be to keep Maxwell quiet and/or make sure she omits certain info.
Tbh, this post isn't for you because your mind is already made up and you argue in bad faith. This post is for the person who's conflicted and knows somethings up but maybe can't put it into certain terms.
If you, and you do, trust this current admin after all their lies ("surveillance footage is raw and unedited, minute missing is normal")....God help you.