Law Trump says the Epstein list is a conspiracy created by Obama and Clinton

Do you believe Trump is in the Epstein List?

  • Yes, absolutely.

    Votes: 259 57.8%
  • Yes, probably.

    Votes: 125 27.9%
  • No, he's not on the list.

    Votes: 28 6.3%
  • No, there is no list. So of course he's not on it.

    Votes: 18 4.0%
  • I'm on the fence.

    Votes: 18 4.0%

  • Total voters
    448
Bullshit. I don't know about you, but if I'm rotting in a prison cell, and I have information that might be of use to a political party who is in charge, that could be used against their very bad no good opponent, I'm rolling them dice.

I've already spoken on the silly logic of claiming something exists and then trying to memory hole it. I'm of the mind that the pressure to make it go away, is from outside influences that could probably put an end to Trump permanently if they wanted to. If Trump was trying to cover for himself, he wouldn't have let it go so far as to have his team lean into it after he was elected. It would've been buried immediately. As for Maxwell, it's not unusual for special inmates to get special treatment, if they are willing to talk about serious matters. She's not the first ever inmate to moved to more comfortable confines in exchange for highly sensitive information.

Since it won't go away though, you're probably gonna get a few sacrificial lambs to shut everyone up. Trump won't be one of them, because he's not involved.

I have never said Trump was guilty of anything with Epstein because there we have no evidence, but if you can't see the logic in being suspicious of someone defending the only person on Earth who can pardon her, you're definitely beyond hope.

You hand-waving the unprecedented waiver for a sex trafficker being transferred to a minimum security prison that is considered a country club by prison standards, that's just icing on the cake. This is one of those moments that defines you.
 
"Us"...LOL.

I'd duck that who response to, if I were you.

Imagine being so lame as to trying to say "some lawyer said trump was really cooperative about Epstein," and then getting outed for omitting that the quote came from Alan "I love getting jerked of on Epstein's Island" Dershowitz. But now you promise it came from another lawyer, you'll just never be able to find it.

Alpha Dad raised a bitch.
 
I have never said Trump was guilty of anything with Epstein because there we have no evidence, but if you can't see the logic in being suspicious of someone defending the only person on Earth who can pardon her, you're definitely beyond hope.
No. Again, under certain circumstances, special inmates get special treatment. It's why Henry Lee Lucas was treated with kid gloves. You know, that convicted SERIAL KILLER who got all sorts of privileges for information(false information) he was providing...

It's so weird though. Are you a LOLawyer too, like @Darkballs?
You hand-waving the unprecedented waiver for a sex trafficker being transferred to a minimum security prison that is considered a country club by prison standards, that's just icing on the cake. This is one of those moments that defines you.
Cry more.
 
The evidence is likely in those files your boy refuses to release. Have you worked up the courage yet, to explain why you're happy trump's going back on his word?
Great, so there isn't any but "trust me, bro". I'll ask for the 85th time and you'll tuck vagina and not answer either; why did none of the people who had access to all the imaginary evidence never press charges or say anything at any point in any of their desperate " this is it" scrambles to prosecute him? I understand it's a very inconvenient question for your CT, but you can't even find someone smarter than you to even make a plausible guess?
 
Great, so there isn't any but "trust me, bro". I'll ask for the 85th time and you'll tuck vagina and not answer either; why did none of the people who had access to all the imaginary evidence never press charges or say anything at any point in any of their desperate " this is it" scrambles to prosecute him? I understand it's a very inconvenient question for your CT, but you can't even find someone smarter than you to even make a plausible guess?

The only people I know who claimed to have access to the Epstein files and that they were full of damning evidence, was the Trump administration.

So this entire stupid reasoning, that trump is excused from releasing the Epstein files that he promised he would do mere months ago, because Biden, or Obama, or Hillary, never claimed to have reviewed any such information is stupid. You idiots are demanding to know why people who never promised anything, aren't delivering on the promises only Trump made. Therefore, Trump doesn't need to release the files he said he would because they didn't.

You can't spin it any other way. Only the trump supporters here want the files to remain hidden.
 
And what was she doing before that, that prevented her from speaking out against Trump? Don't you think she might've spilled those beans prior to him becoming President again, if she was looking for favors from a political party that may have benefitted from such information? Was it all a master plan on her part to wait until Trump became President again, so she could gain favor with that future administration she totally knew would win?

Oh' wait, I forgot you guys are incapable of logic when it comes to Trump.

Stay forever losing.
Or maybe she never had anything to say in her own defense to begin with, which is why she couldn't muster it up during the actual trial, and is doing whatever it takes to appease the guy dangling freedom in front of her face like a carrot lol. Nobody should be talking to her about anything. She should rot in prison. But now she's at a minimum security resort with her SO status waived. Hummm dee dummmm.
 
usicdd3p4ghf1.jpeg

"The party of protecting the kids"


Updated automatically every 5 minutes (I'm not joking)
 
The only people I know who claimed to have access to the Epstein files and that they were full of damning evidence, was the Trump administration.

So this entire stupid reasoning, that trump is excused from releasing the Epstein files that he promised he would do mere months ago, because Biden, or Obama, or Hillary, never claimed to have reviewed any such information is stupid. You idiots are demanding to know why people who never promised anything, aren't delivering on the promises only Trump made. Therefore, Trump doesn't need to release the files he said he would because they didn't.

You can't spin it any other way. Only the trump supporters here want the files to remain hidden.
Lol, your claim is that nobody else even had access to them, even the people who wrote them (wtf?)and that it all just popped up in the last 5 months? Holy shit, I've heard some embarrassing scrambles, but that might win as most desperate. Jesus, at least make an effort.
 
Lol, your claim is that nobody else even had access to them, even the people who wrote them (wtf?)and that it all just popped up in the last 5 months? Holy shit, I've heard some embarrassing scrambles, but that might win as most desperate. Jesus, at least make an effort.

What do you mean, the people who wrote them and why didn't they release them? Who, exactly are you talking about?

Name the person and the promise you are talking about. Who do you think withheld information why does that give trump permission to break his promise?

Not that any of this prevents trump from fulfilling his promise to release the files, which he most definitely claims to have and promised to release all sorts of damning stuff. See. That's a clear example of a promise being broken. Now do the same thing with whatever the fuck you are talking about.
 
You were good with all the child rape, enslavement, and trafficking at our open borders. You never said a thing while Biden was in office. You would have voted for Biden and likely voted for his Border Czar, who oversaw all the child suffering. You have no credibility.

Hey dont look now:


The call is coming from inside the house.
 
It's really obvious when you just make shit up as you go along. You know that, don't you?

You have multiple attorneys who post here. Some of us have worked in criminal law and with Federal Courts. It is not typical at all for convicted sex traffickers to get reductions in treatment for unsupported testimony.

And the whole room knows that, because you'll never source an example of one to support your claim. Honestly kid, when you do silly shit like, omit that it's Alan Dershowitz when you cite a "lawyer," speaking fondly about Trump and Epstein, you not only don't fool anyone, you come across as a pathetic liar.

Think about that. You just got caught by multiple posters, lying about the Epstein case in order to make Trump look better. I honestly can't think of anything lamer.
Also, when do people get sweetheart deals & favors to be a character witness for a guy not even charged with a crime?????? Literally to just do damage control & PR for Trump like "i didn't see him abuse kids in my presence. "
Thats not deal fkn worthy. She hasn't given anyone up yet & they dont care. More proof that its about protecting their Emperor than actually grabbing everyone involved.
 
Also, when do people get sweetheart deals & favors to be a character witness for a guy not even charged with a crime?????? Literally to just do damage control & PR for Trump like "i didn't see him abuse kids in my presence. "
Thats not deal fkn worthy. She hasn't given anyone up yet & they dont care. More proof that its about protecting their Emperor than actually grabbing everyone involved.

This was brought up. @HereticBD was asked to provide a single example of such. He refused.

It's weird. They act like the rest of the WR can't just read the thread sequentially and see them make shit up and get called out directly, only to just move on like nothing happened. I mean, I get the need for the hopelessly partisan to never give an inch, but when everyone just watches you get caught in a lie, I'm not sure how they think they come across as anything other than just pure losers.
 
This was brought up. @HereticBD was asked to provide a single example of such. He refused.

It's weird. They act like the rest of the WR can't just read the thread sequentially and see them make shit up and get called out directly, only to just move on like nothing happened. I mean, I get the need for the hopelessly partisan to never give an inch, but when everyone just watches you get caught in a lie, I'm not sure how they think they come across as anything other than just pure losers.
Well to be fair in Heretic's case he can't post anything that would piss off his dad, so he's kind of locked in there content wise
 
Right. Youre over here carrying water for a child trafficking scumbag. This seems to track with Trump fan.

trump fan seems to be synonymous with epstein enthusiast these days.

there isn't a sex pest that they won't try to hide behind just as long as they put on a red hat while they ask them for donations. the self-proclaimed party of law and order, and the self-proclaimed party of christian and family values yeehaw!
 
No. Again, under certain circumstances, special inmates get special treatment. It's why Henry Lee Lucas was treated with kid gloves. You know, that convicted SERIAL KILLER who got all sorts of privileges for information(false information) he was providing...

It's so weird though. Are you a LOLawyer too, like @Darkballs?

Cry more.

Weird that the example you provide was a complete failure where the special privileges netted false information.

Trump's lawyer talks to Maxwell, she gets transferred to comfortable facilities, and says publicly Trump wasn't involved.

To this day I still haven't accused Trump of anything despite the depth of his association with Epstein and his depraved relations with women, but you're celebrating an obvious quid pro quo with a heinous sex trafficker. You're being undeniably partisan while accusing others of doing that.

You're picking a stupid hill to die on.
 
Back
Top