No. It doesn’t excuse anything and opens the door for unchecked pardons in the future
Gonna give you a hint: If your response to being being called out that you are ignorant of history is "Yes, I'm ignorant, but I picked one election result correctly," you're projecting your saltiness.
I didn't say it excused it. I pointed out that Trump is the primary reason for the erosion of American rule of law in this century, and he would do it regardless of Biden or not.
I didn’t say I was ignorant, I said you were ignorant. I’m not salty at all, but you are. Every thread you’re on in here just sees you whining like a little bitch.
You said said you had a clue regarding getting the election right, and then used "but" immediately before it. In the English language, that conjunction means the opposite in the implied first clause....aka you didn't know that particular area of knowledge.
Exactly what people who aren't salty and ignorant sound like lol.
A bad poster?
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!? So much salt, tears, TDS. This is what it's all about baby!
Someone build a time machine so we can go back and ask Gerald Ford
Even though he had a chance to do it, and didn't. LOL.
In a thread where it’s being discussed whether or not pardons that were auto signed are valid, you’re trying to argue that Biden’s unprecedented pardons were actually because Trump is so terrible.
If he fears oversight bad enough, I think he will. He's already abusing the Alien Enemies Act in a manner that no US president has before.
