- Joined
- Jul 18, 2024
- Messages
- 3,726
- Reaction score
- 9,708
Just remember, they were left wingers once upon a time. It's just the democratic party that's turned extremist.
Yeah the Left is too extreme
Just remember, they were left wingers once upon a time. It's just the democratic party that's turned extremist.
I think people are just over this silliness at this point. The same case that the supreme court struck down, repackaged so we can do this all over again. You can fall for it again if you want, not me.Where did all the witch hunt trump apologists go?
I think people are just over this silliness at this point. The same case that the supreme court struck down, repackaged so we can do this all over again. You can fall for it again if you want, not me.
Do what all over again? He still has a whole bunch of crimes he's never even gone to trial for.I think people are just over this silliness at this point. The same case that the supreme court struck down, repackaged so we can do this all over again. You can fall for it again if you want, not me.
That is one way to cope with it I guess.I think people are just over this silliness at this point. The same case that the supreme court struck down, repackaged so we can do this all over again. You can fall for it again if you want, not me.
Is it a riot or an insurrection? Which is it?
Of course someone that has the willingness to eat the spoon fed shit Trump says wants to ignore this.I think people are just over this silliness at this point. The same case that the supreme court struck down, repackaged so we can do this all over again. You can fall for it again if you want, not me.
it is like they do not know that Roger Stone used this tactic when he spurred the Brooks Brother riots, which DID stop the electoral count in Florida, requiring the SC to eventually step in and throw the election to Bush, when it was shown later, Gore would have won, if the count was completed.They attempted a type a coup.
The storming of the capitol building was only part of the attempt. The riot's purpose wasn't to literally take over the government, but to pressure the officials inside to vote in favor of Trump's ridiculous scheme to remain in power.
Hope this helps.
The SCOTUS didn’t strike down this case. This case hasn’t even gone to trial yet. I am guessing that what you’re getting confused is that Trump filed a motion asserting that he was immune from all charges, the judge ruled on that, Trump appealed their ruling, and up to the SCOTUS we went for them to rule on what a POTUS is or is not immune from. In light of that ruling, Jack Smith filed this massive brief to both remove things that were no longer applicable, but also address exactly why and how Trump would not be immune under the guidelines SCOTUS put forth. Make sense?I think people are just over this silliness at this point. The same case that the supreme court struck down, repackaged so we can do this all over again. You can fall for it again if you want, not me.
IIRC, the Supreme Court struck it down, issued Trump a written apology, and gave him a key to the city.The SCOTUS didn’t strike down this case. This case hasn’t even gone to trial yet. I am guessing that what you’re getting confused is that Trump filed a motion asserting that he was immune from all charges, the judge ruled on that, Trump appealed their ruling, and up to the SCOTUS we went for them to rule on what a POTUS is or is not immune from. In light of that ruling, Jack Smith filed this massive brief to both remove things that were no longer applicable, but also address exactly why and how Trump would not be immune under the guidelines SCOTUS put forth. Make sense?
So I don’t think it’s a matter of people “being over this silliness.” It’s a matter of people not understanding wtf is actually happening, coupled with the fact that many Trump supporters don’t give a fuck about any crimes Trump commits.
They didn't strike down the case. They made a ruling on Presidential Immunity, that effected the indictment, but as you can see there's still plenty of evidence against him.I think people are just over this silliness at this point. The same case that the supreme court struck down, repackaged so we can do this all over again. You can fall for it again if you want, not me.
well folks, they found some real life election interference that happened by real life people in the real world. and once again, it was a republican behind it. how about that? shocking!
Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters convicted on 7 of 10 counts in Colorado election interference case
Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters was found guilty Monday on seven out of 10 counts in her Colorado election interference case.
Peters, 68, was convicted of three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty and failing to comply with the secretary of state.
Twenty-first Judicial District Judge Matthew Barrett read the jury's verdict Monday after about four hours of deliberation in the case that started roughly two-and-a-half years ago. The charges stem from allegations that, as the top election official in Mesa County, Peters helped breach the county election computer systems.
In a grand jury indictment against her, prosecutors described Peters' efforts as "a deceptive scheme which was designed to influence public servants, breach security protocols, exceed permissible access to voting equipment and set in motion the eventual distribution of confidential information to unauthorized people."
Prosecutors said Peters was seeking fame and became "fixated" on voting problems after becoming involved with those who had questioned the accuracy of the 2020 presidential election results.
The case marked the first prosecution of a local election official over a suspected security breach in connection with the 2020 election. The breach heightened concerns over the possibility that rogue election workers could use their access and knowledge in a threat to election security.
Peters, a Republican, has been embraced by election deniers, including MyPillow founder Mike Lindell, who said the 2020 election was rigged against former President Donald Trump.
She did not immediately respond to a text message seeking comment Monday evening and an email was bounced back as undeliverable. One of her attorneys also did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
"Tina Peters willfully compromised her own election equipment trying to prove Trump's Big Lie. She has been found guilty of 4 felonies and 3 misdemeanors by a jury of her peers and will now face the consequences of her actions," Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said in a statement. "Today's verdict sends a clear message: we will not tolerate any effort to threaten the security of our gold standard elections. I am proud that justice for Colorado voters has been served today."
![]()
Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters convicted on 7 of 10 counts in Colorado election interference case
Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters was found guilty on 7 out of 10 counts in her Colorado election interference case Monday. Peters has been embraced by election deniers, including MyPillow founder Mike Lindell.www.cbsnews.com
i guess we'll just have to file tina peters right underneath brian k. pritchard, robert rivernider, charles barnes, sidney powell, kenneth chesebro, scott hall, james saunders, kim phuong taylor, jay ketcik, joan halstead, charles barnes, john rider, kirk hartle, bruce bartman, barry morphew, the 3 or 4 people from the villages in florida, ralph thurman, and whomever other real world people that i may have forgotten who have either pled guilty to or were found to have committed real world 2020 election-related crimes.
mike lindell on his partner-in-crime's recent conviction (probably): "i never liked that bitch anyways!"
mike lindell's buddy and lauren hoebert's former campaign manager just got sentenced to 9 years in prison today just to own the libs.
Trump election conspiracist Tina Peters sentenced to 9 years in prison by Colorado judge
- Former Mesa County, Colorado, clerk Tina Peters was sentenced to nine years in prison for crimes related to a breach of her county’s voting system.
- Peters espoused the false conspiracy theory that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election to President Joe Biden due to ballot fraud.
- She was accused of allowing access to the voting system to an expert affiliated with My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell, a leading proponent of the Trump election conspiracy theory.
Tina Peters, a former Colorado county clerk who espoused the false conspiracy theory that former President Donald Trump lost the 2020 election due to ballot fraud, was sentenced Thursday to nine years in prison for crimes related to a breach of her county’s voting system.
“You are no hero,” state District Court Judge Matthew Barrett told Peters. “You’re a charlatan who used and is still using your prior position in office to peddle a snake oil that’s been proven to be junk time and time again.”
“Your lies are well documented, and these convictions are serious. I’m convinced you’d do it all over again if you could,” Barrett told the former Mesa County clerk.
“You’re as defiant a defendant as this court has ever seen.”
Peters, who had requested probation, told the judge before being sentenced, “I’ve never done anything with malice to break the law. I’ve only wanted to serve the people of Mesa County.
Prosecutors had asked Barrett to sentence her to the maximum possible sentence: 20 years behind bars.
She was immediately taken into custody after Barrett rejected her lawyer’s request that she remain free.
Peters, 68, was convicted by a trial jury in August of seven criminal counts, including attempt to influence a public servant, conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, violation of duty, and failure to comply with secretary of state requirements.
She was accused of using another person’s security badge to allow someone else to gain access to her county’s election system.
The person who used that badge was affiliated with Mike Lindell, the CEO of My Pillow and a leading proponent of the claim that Trump’s defeat for a second term was due to ballot fraud.
Peters had falsely accused Dominion Voting Systems, which made Mesa County’s election system, of participating in the purported scheme against Trump.
She should have gotten 20 years.
Law and order.
This case was never struck down. Nice try though, do you find it weird that you have to lie, to simp for Trump.I think people are just over this silliness at this point. The same case that the supreme court struck down, repackaged so we can do this all over again. You can fall for it again if you want, not me.
Trump would not even piss on her if she was on fire. She is just another useful Rube, Trump used then when she gets in trouble for breaking the law for him, he does not do squat to help her.Being 70 years old and doing a dime for an illiterate felon is the most straight up loser shit I've ever heard of. Imagine how embarrassing it would be to be related to that. I'd change my name and move to a new state