• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Elections Trump Indicted On 91 Counts

Only someone as incredibly Whimpy as Whimpy McGoof could see the Orange Fraudster-Rapist being given Immunity by the SC and still walk around crying that things are so unfair for him. Boo hoo, nobody has ever been treated so unfairly. Everybody says so. People come up to me with tears in their eyes. Sir, sir...
It's such a weird cult they're in. History won't be kind to these retards. Once DonOLD is gone, hopefully they fade into obscurity.
 
tampons in the boy's bathroom

You should take a closer look at that. The bill you're talking about was copy and pasted from a bill in Utah, and doesn't mandate tampons in boys bathrooms. The twenty five schools surveyed aren't actually putting tampons in boys bathrooms, and remember, they aren't mandated.

Which is kind of a shame.

The bill is extremely beneficial to poor people, and poor boys often have sisters and of course mothers. Not that you guys care about the poor.

Should tampons be free: Why are feminine products so expensive?

Walz is a hell of a guy.
 
Part of me does want them to stick around so we can all watch the mental gymnastics they perform trying to act like they were never part of the cult. That should be hilarious.
They'll just do the same trick they tried immediately after Jan 6th:

"Stop saying his name! STOP! Don't mention him! He's not president anymore! Why are you still speaking about him?!?! TDS!!!!"

images
 
0-91

Lawfare has been exposed. The Civil cases against Trump will be over turned as well.

really? so far he's been convicted on 34/34 charges that he was tried for. the fraudy orange rapist is truly a man of conviction!

you should know that facts are not subject to your feelings princess, no matter how many mental gymnastics you play with yourself to defend rapists, sexual predators, fraudsters, defamers, and felons and try to convince yourself that molestini cheetolini is anything more than just a con man, a criminal, an adulterous pig, and an absolute loser.
 
Last edited:
Pages and pages of projection from the cult of the woke. The party of mentally ill unmarried women.
 
You should take a closer look at that. The bill you're talking about was copy and pasted from a bill in Utah, and doesn't mandate tampons in boys bathrooms. The twenty five schools surveyed aren't actually putting tampons in boys bathrooms, and remember, they aren't mandated.

Which is kind of a shame.

The bill is extremely beneficial to poor people, and poor boys often have sisters and of course mothers. Not that you guys care about the poor.

Should tampons be free: Why are feminine products so expensive?

Walz is a hell of a guy.

Walz is a creeper. No single dude in their 30's sets up a gay club in a high school. The guy is a weirdo for sure.

His positions on abortion, trans sexuals, and crime are next world looney tunes.
 
really? so far he's been convicted on 34/34 charges that he was tried for. the fraudy orange rapist is truly a man of conviction!

you should know that facts are not subject to your feelings princess, no matter how many mental gymnastics you play with yourself to defend rapists, sexual predators, fraudsters, defamers, and felons and try to convince yourself that molestini cheetolini is anything more than just a con man, a criminal, an adulterous pig, and an absolute loser.

Nope. There has not been a sentencing mean the convictions are not in place. You want to lecture me on the law and you're talking out of your ass. Now with Bragg's position this looks toast before the appeals courts... lol
 
Nope. There has not been a sentencing mean the convictions are not in place. You want to lecture me on the law and you're talking out of your ass. Now with Bragg's position this looks toast before the appeals courts... lol
Lol, you tell that to him not being allowed to even own a firearm in his own country. And his liquor licence in NJ being put on hold. And not being allowed to travel to certain countries because he's a convicted felon.
 
Nope. There has not been a sentencing mean the convictions are not in place. You want to lecture me on the law and you're talking out of your ass. Now with Bragg's position this looks toast before the appeals courts... lol

once again skippy, facts are not subject to your fee-fee's. fraudy von schitzenpantz was already convicted by an impartial jury of his peers.

have fun on appeal i guess. if there is one thing that Mr. 1-65 is known for, it's winning on appeal! hey do you think he'll be paying those all star lawyers of his that got him convicted on 34 out of 34 felony charges?
 
Lol, you tell that to him not being allowed to even own a firearm in his own country. And his liquor licence in NJ being put on hold. And not being allowed to travel to certain countries because he's a convicted felon.

That will all go away if there is not sentence to confirm the conviction. Whoever did that preemptively was being wholly political and not following the law. Convictions are not complete without sentencing.

A conviction is not official without a sentence. You're welcome.
 
That will all go away if there is not sentence to confirm the conviction. Whoever did that preemptively was being wholly political and not following the law. Convictions are not complete without sentencing.

A conviction is not official without a sentence. You're welcome.
Yeah, the dozens of countries refusing him entry and him having his right to the 2A revoked wasn't funny as fuck? The liquor licence is on hold but the rest he's fucked. The first time I moved to the US I was allowed to buy a firearm, he can't own anything haha.

Nor can he do any business in NY which is brilliant.
 
Yeah, the dozens of countries refusing him entry and him having his right to the 2A revoked wasn't funny as fuck? The liquor licence is on hold but the rest he's fucked. The first time I moved to the US I was allowed to buy a firearm, he can't own anything haha.

Nor can he do any business in NY which is brilliant.

Once again... nothing to do with the actual U.S. Law as nothing official happened in the case to conclude it. Purely political moves by those nations. I wonder how well that will work out for them if he wins?

0-91

Bragg acknowledged that some of the evidence introduced by his prosecutors at last spring’s trial was improperly admitted under the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in United States v. Trump, and that's just the beginning of the legal issues with that case. Everyone knows it never stands up upon a review by any court honoring the U.S. Constitution. It was pure lawfare by an AG that ran on "get Trump".
 
Last edited:
Back
Top