Related:
The state noticeably cited a "stunningly deficient" recent pleading to support the position that John Eastman's lawyering still "poses a threat of harm" to the public.
lawandcrime.com
Hilarious:
"Recall that the former Chapman University law professor under indictment along with Trump
argued he needs to continue working as a lawyer in order to pay off legal bills stemming from the Georgia RICO case, noting that he is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
The bar said that Eastman’s “stunningly deficient” lawyering on behalf of Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., in a California federal lawsuit only supports that state’s contention that there is a risk of harm in allowing Eastman to practice law while he appeals the disbarment recommendation.
As Law&Crime
reported a couple of weeks ago, U.S. District Judge
Hernan Vera took shots at Eastman even as the jurist allowed the lawsuit to proceed in part against the cities of Anaheim and Riverside for canceling his clients’ 2021 political rallies.
The judge slammed Eastman, Gaetz, and Greene for suing the League of Women Voters, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) based on a “conspiracy theory.”
“The gravamen of plaintiffs’ claims against the nonprofit defendants is, both legally and literally, a conspiracy theory that relies purely on conjecture,” Vera wrote. “And without an unlawful conspiracy, all that is left to aver against the Nonprofit Defendants are the unremarkable allegations that they exercised their
own First Amendment rights to lobby for the cancellation of the event. That is protected.”
“The effect of Plaintiffs’ unprecedented and stunningly deficient pleading — haling nine civil rights groups into federal court for speaking out against an event — should shock in equal measure civic members from across the political spectrum,” he added — and the Office of Chief Trial Counsel noticed.
“[T]hat respondent’s current clients want his continued representation does nothing to establish that there is no risk of harm from respondent’s continued handling of cases on behalf of those clients,” the office said, pointing to Vera’s ruling. “Indeed, a recent ruling in a case in which respondent represents some of those clients who desire his continued representation demonstrates the risks.”"
Aaaaand another MAGA lawyer creep loses his license for the lead MAGA creep, Tiny d.
MAGA - Make Attorneys Get Attorneys
