• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Trump Indicted On 91 Counts

Here is the thing about Diaper Don taking all these L's in court. Well he put his daughter in law in charge of the RNC funding and one thing we know about the Trumps based on the now shut down Trump Foundation is when a Trump is in charge of someone else money they will steal it, even if the money was meant for kids with cancer.
So if you are GOP candidate hoping to get a little money from the RNC for some TV/Radio ads or billboards to help you win your election, well know that money is going to defend Trump against illegally using campaign funds to keep a chick's mouth shut, who gets paid to do gang bangs for a living, after giving her only 2 pumps, she could not even feel, while his wife taking care of his newborn would not find out, plus at the time Trump was worried about the Christian vote. Jokes on Trump, the typical Christian in the USA is a Cafeteria Christian, and only like to say they are a Christian without actually living by the word of God, so he could have saved the money instead of giving it to the chick who does porn. Most Christian's would not even care he has cheated on his current wife multiple times, and would still say Trump was appointed by God.

GOP Candidate "Hi, Lara could I get some money to help me get elected."
Lara "Lol, all that money is going to pay lawyers so my father in Law can take L's in court. You think Lawyer 8's, like Habba Dabba Doo come cheap"
 
Not to be a downer, because that's great and everything, but I really only care about whether he makes the deadline to appeal or not. Whether it's 4 or 5 or 6 hundred million he ends up paying* is not the main thing to me. He's either financially fucked or he can stump up the money either way and only time will tell.

* @idrankyourbeer if it gets up to 600 million I'm calling that a win in your sweepstakes.
 
abovethelaw.com

Special Counsel Whacks Trump For Claims That His Theft Of Docs Is Just Like Biden - Above the Law

Yeah, NO.
abovethelaw.com abovethelaw.com

Conditions in Judge Aileen Cannon’s courtroom are far from “best,” which is how the special counsel found himself yesterday having to explain that President Biden calling up the FBI when he discovered classified docs in his garage, returning them immediately, consenting to a search, and then sitting down for an interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur is not the same as Trump refusing to return classified documents, defying a subpoena, and then sending his goons to try to delete the evidence.

The kerfuffle began in January when Trump’s lawyers filed a bonkers motion to compel predicated on the theory that the entire executive branch — more or less — was part of the “prosecution team,” and thus subject to discovery obligations under Brady. Trump demanded vast swathes of information, much of it classified, from agencies as diverse as the National Archives, the National Security Council, the White House Counsel’s Office, and the Department of Energy. He also wanted internal prosecutorial deliberations to prove that the case is being directed by Joe Biden as part of a Deep State op to beat him in the November election...

Trump’s lawyers fired off an absolutely batshit “reply brief” making wild, new claims of prosecutorial bias and demanding evidence to support their upcoming motion for dismissal based on selective and vindictive prosecution. Trump pointed to the recent decision not to prosecute Biden for retaining classified documents, as well as earlier failures to prosecute Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Mike Pence, and James Comey, as evidence of selective prosecution.

.....

lol poor Mike Pence. What a schmuck. 4 years of enabling covfefe only to end up next to Hillary on a list of people Trump wants prosecuted.
 

Judge Cannon tells Trump co-defendants they can't see confidential docs in new ruling​


Judge Aileen Cannon told former President Donald Trump's co-defendants in his federal Florida case that they cannot look at classified documents, court records show.

The Trump-appointed judge sided with special prosecutor Jack Smith and barred Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira from receiving access to secret materials produced in discovery, Guardian reporter Hugo Lowell was among the first to report.

This is one of four criminal court cases Trump faces in 2024 as he inches toward becoming the Republican nominee in the upcoming presidential election.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to charges that he willfully retained national defense information, conspired to obstruct justice and corruptly concealed documents.

He also argues he's the target of a political witch hunt.

Smith contends Trump scattered classified records across his Florida social club Mar-a-Lago.

www.rawstory.com

Judge Cannon tells Trump co-defendants they can't see confidential docs in new ruling

Judge Aileen Cannon told former President Donald Trump's co-defendants in his federal Florida case that they cannot look at classified documents, court records show. The Trump-appointed judge sided with special prosecutor Jack Smith and barred Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira from receiving...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com


The order also provides three reasons Smith's motion was granted:

"First, as a threshold matter, the materials at issue implicate the government’s classified information and/or national security privilege. The Special Counsel 'supported each of its motions with detailed declarations from the relevant equity-holders explaining the specific information at issue, its classification status, and why its disclosure even to cleared counsel would damage national security.'"

"Second, the Special Counsel has made a sufficient showing that Defendant Nauta and De Oliveira’s personal review of the materials produced in classified discovery would not be “relevant and helpful” to their defense, within the meaning of CIPA [Classified Information Procedures Act]."

"Third, Defendants Nauta and De Oliveira fail to rebut the Special Counsel’s showing as to the subject materials’ lack of helpfulness," adding, "Defendants Nauta and De Oliveira still fail to provide any examples of documents produced in classified discovery that—if made available to them for personal review—would be helpful in countering the allegation that they conspired to help Defendant Trump 'keep classified documents he had taken with him from the White House' and 'hide and conceal them from a federal grand jury.'"


Cannon's order comes one day after Smith alleged in a new court filing that "Trump did more than violate classified documents laws — he also tried to get his attorney to take part in his crimes."

The document read, "When presented with a grand jury subpoena demanding the return of the remaining documents bearing classification markings, Trump attempted to enlist his own attorney in the corrupt endeavor, suggesting that he falsely tell the FBI and grand jury that Trump did not have any documents, and suggesting that his attorney hide or destroy documents rather than produce them to the government."

www.alternet.org

Judge Cannon grants Jack Smith’s motion to withhold classified materials from Trump defendants

United States District Judge Aileen Cannon on Tuesday handed special counsel Jack Smith a win in Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago classified documents case. The Guardian's Hugo Lowell reports via X (formerly Twitter), "Just in: US Judge Cannon in the Trump classified docs case grants Special Counsel’s...
www.alternet.org www.alternet.org

oof.
 
Last edited:


and there we have it. it is now on the record that molestini cheetolini was hoarding nuclear secrets. something which under the atomic energy act, a president does not even have the authority himself to declassify on his own and requires, by law, extensive consultation with executive branch agencies. they found this on his premesis after he was no longer president, no longer had the security clearance to handle classified material, and there was no longer an SCIF on his property as he was no longer cleared to house classified material.

but how nice of trump to admit before trial there is no dispute to the facts and only the law. and the law is very clear on this matter.
 
Last edited:
idrankyourbeer said:


and there we have it. it is now on the record that molestini cheetolini was hoarding nuclear secrets. something which under the atomic energy act, a president does not even have the authority himself to declassify on his own and requires, by law, extensive consultation with executive branch agencies. they found this on his premesis after he was no longer president, no longer had the security clearance to handle classified material, and there was no longer an SCIF on his property as he was no longer cleared to house classified material.

but how nice of trump to admit before trial there is no dispute to the facts and only the law. and the law is very clear on this matter.
Click to expand...

This is what I feared the most...

Spin coming from the defense squad in 3....2...
 
idrankyourbeer said:


and there we have it. it is now on the record that molestini cheetolini was hoarding nuclear secrets. something which under the atomic energy act, a president does not even have the authority himself to declassify on his own and requires, by law, extensive consultation with executive branch agencies. they found this on his premesis after he was no longer president, no longer had the security clearance to handle classified material, and there was no longer an SCIF on his property as he was no longer cleared to house classified material.

but how nice of trump to admit before trial there is no dispute to the facts and only the law. and the law is very clear on this matter.
Click to expand...



The man is a Russian asset.
 
HOLA said:
This is just sad. SAD!

newrepublic.com

Trump Has a Hilarious New Excuse for Why He Can’t Put Up Bond

Donald Trump is now trying to get out of posting the bond in his E. Jean Carroll case.
newrepublic.com newrepublic.com

Donald Trump is arguing that he shouldn’t have to post the massive bond in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case against him … because he’s simply too rich.

Trump owes Carroll $83.3 million for defaming her in 2019 when she first accused him of sexual assault. The former president had 30 days to either pay the damages or post a bond required by New York state law to appeal the decision. But Trump’s legal team filed a motion on Friday to delay payment.

“Having argued to the jury that President Trump has great financial resources, Plaintiff is in no position to contradict herself now and contend that she requires the protection of a bond during the brief period while post-trial motions are pending,” Trump’s lawyers wrote.

They argued that Trump’s extreme wealth was security enough that he would eventually pay. The lawyers also suggested that the court project that the total judgment would be reduced on appeal to $22.25 million, requiring a bond of about $24.48 million...

Under New York law, if a person wants to appeal a civil case ruling, they must first post a bond equal to 110 percent of the judgment. In this case, Trump would have to pay $91.63 million in order to appeal the Carroll ruling.
Click to expand...
The guy doesn't have a liquid dollar to his name.

For someone who gave the impression of having a few billion in loose change down the back of his couch he can't even find 84 million.

These judgements are going to bankrupt him unless some generous Russian or Saudis come to his rescue (with no strings attached if course)
 
Last edited:

Trump pays $392k in legal fees to New York Times after failed lawsuit over disclosure of his tax documents​


Donald Trump has paid $392,000 to The New York Times to cover the legal costs from his failed lawsuit against the newspaper and its journalists over a 2018 investigation into his finances that included confidential tax records, a spokesman for the Times told CNN on Monday.

Trump was ordered to pay the money in January, more than eight months after Judge Robert R. Reed granted the Times’ motion to dismiss the case against it and its journalists, concluding the journalists’ conduct was protected by the New York Constitution.
www.yahoo.com

Trump pays $392k in legal fees to New York Times after failed lawsuit over disclosure of his tax documents

Donald Trump has paid $392,000 to The New York Times to cover the legal costs from his failed lawsuit against the newspaper and its journalists over a 2018 investigation into his finances that included confidential tax records, a spokesman for the Times told CNN on Monday.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

---
Soo much winning...
 
MicroBrew said:

Trump pays $392k in legal fees to New York Times after failed lawsuit over disclosure of his tax documents​


Donald Trump has paid $392,000 to The New York Times to cover the legal costs from his failed lawsuit against the newspaper and its journalists over a 2018 investigation into his finances that included confidential tax records, a spokesman for the Times told CNN on Monday.

Trump was ordered to pay the money in January, more than eight months after Judge Robert R. Reed granted the Times’ motion to dismiss the case against it and its journalists, concluding the journalists’ conduct was protected by the New York Constitution.
www.yahoo.com

Trump pays $392k in legal fees to New York Times after failed lawsuit over disclosure of his tax documents

Donald Trump has paid $392,000 to The New York Times to cover the legal costs from his failed lawsuit against the newspaper and its journalists over a 2018 investigation into his finances that included confidential tax records, a spokesman for the Times told CNN on Monday.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

---
Soo much winning...
Click to expand...

he really owned those libs.
 
Strychnine said:
Let's start keeping a running tally...




Around every 8 seconds, $10 is added to the already $465M
Click to expand...


True or False: Donald Trump.​


Correct! Game over! Your final score is 10/10.

with all the true's one after the other, they almost tricked me at "Donald Trump is a good man."

not this time!!!
 
idrankyourbeer said:


and there we have it. it is now on the record that molestini cheetolini was hoarding nuclear secrets. something which under the atomic energy act, a president does not even have the authority himself to declassify on his own and requires, by law, extensive consultation with executive branch agencies. they found this on his premesis after he was no longer president, no longer had the security clearance to handle classified material, and there was no longer an SCIF on his property as he was no longer cleared to house classified material.

but how nice of trump to admit before trial there is no dispute to the facts and only the law. and the law is very clear on this matter.
Click to expand...

BUT BUT INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY REEEEEEEEEK!

lmao
 
So Trump is racking up a 114k a day in interest to post his bond in New York so he can appeal .
that kind of money you could have sex with 2 chicks at the same time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,270,915
Messages
57,690,503
Members
175,808
Latest member
Banana&Coffee

Share this page

Back
Top