- Joined
- Feb 22, 2005
- Messages
- 54,221
- Reaction score
- 33,943
I have to imagine sitting in a room with 11 other people looking at the same evidence, trying to reach a decision, even a pretty biased juror will cave if it’s obvious. It would take a real zealot otherwise, I think. Not that it’s impossible, of course. I’m assuming this case is pretty airtight based on what we’ve seen so far.
Out of all the cases against him that are likely to proceed to trial, mathematically there's bound to be one jury that has one zealot who will hang it.
What's almost mathematically impossible is there being one zealot on all of them.