Elections Trump Indicted On 91 Counts

I don't know what the average is, probably depends on the time of the day and could differ between each polling station. The second part of your post is weird. Obviously the idea should be to have enough polling stations strategically spread out to ensure reasonably short lines and banning something like handing out bottles of water sounds kinda ridiculous.

I could understand banning people wearing political attire from handing out water because that could be seen as "buying" votes but that's about as far as I'll go on that one.
I agree with you but the GOP seems to be acting counter to those goals.
 
Recounting and auditing won't catch that kind of fraud because the votes are all on one pile. How are they going to catch you if you fake your brother's autograph or filling in his ballot? If you're gonna do a recount and going to count the same fraudulent votes what do you expect the outcome will be?

I think the surpressing votes is a bullshit argument. If you can't be bothered to take 30-60mins out of your day to vote then fuck you and fuck your vote.

I don't know what the average is, probably depends on the time of the day and could differ between each polling station. The second part of your post is weird. Obviously the idea should be to have enough polling stations strategically spread out to ensure reasonably short lines and banning something like handing out bottles of water sounds kinda ridiculous.

I could understand banning people wearing political attire from handing out water because that could be seen as "buying" votes but that's about as far as I'll go on that one.


here's an idea that you trumptards won't like. how about allowing every american citizen their legal right to to vote and not make it as hard for them as possible?
 
Last edited:
I think you quoted the wrong person there buddy. Nothing you're talking about is related to the post you quoted.
Nope quoted the right person.
A dude who called himself the cringiest name of all time, AKA the Cyber Ninja. That dude duped the Rubes into thinking he was former military intelligence, when actually a fucking Jeep mechanic, wormed his way into doing a recount for AZ and banked tax payer money. He did it by telling the Rubes that he for sure positively had all the proof that Ole Man Joe cheated to win AZ. Then some AZ legislators was like every other legal challenge we have done has gone to shit(AKA Kari Lake is pulling ahead), lets hire the Cyber Ninja to once and for all prove Fat Trump won. Well the Ninja, mishandled private voter information, took like 6 more months longer than was told, and come to find has never ever fucking done a recount before. The Cyber Ninja then saw an opportunity like most people who cater to dumb Trump supporters that these dumb fucks are so easily fleeced. Well Cyber Ninja pocketed an ass load of AZ tax payers money, took private jets every where like he was some 2nd rate rapper, and then when done with his recount said Trump got his shit pushed in by Biden in AZ. But yeah election was totally totally stolen.
You ever wonder why Trump does not pay for recounts with all the Rube money he collected. Well Dumb Donald paid WI 3 million, to do a recount, and that recount found more Biden votes and Dumb Donald decided, its better to use the Rube money to pay for attorneys and not for recounts. Dont get me started on Drunk Rudy's court record, but will give Drunk Rudy some credit, dude loves young chicks that pretend to be his daughter and willing to take it in the ass. NO wonder Rudy is constantly hopped up on Vodka and Viagra. Clapping cheeks of younger women, as a 70+ year old man, takes science to do correctly.
Election was totally stolen, Bruh!
 
I agree with you but the GOP seems to be acting counter to those goals.

Whether it's gerrymandering, voter supression or creating more and easier ways to fraud, both sides aren't coming out looking very good.

Why does nobody propose a law to require voter IDs while simultaneously proposing a law that makes those voter IDs free? Just one small example.
 
lol rudy flew out of the courtroom and didn't even bother to put on a show for the cameras this time. lies have consequences and who would have ever guessed that such a staunch member of the party of law & order and personal accountability would take such an issue with being held accountable for his own crimes?

the jury is deliberating. i wouldn't be surprised if they awarded the freemans the full 48 million they are asking for and then some. and then they should sue him again for the defamatory comments he made about them outside of the courtroom in front of the cameras the other day. then let dominion come in and drive the final dagger through his heart!
 
here's an idea that you trumptards won't like. how about allowing every american citizen their legal right to to vote and not make it as hard for them as possible?

Cant do that, the reason they want more control over voting is because there policies and ideas are turning people away
Same with why some idiots want the voting age raised. Its not because "they dont know politics!" its because the youth vote the opposite of what they want

Gotta rig the game

but its big media, big tech doing it all!
 
Whether it's gerrymandering, voter supression or creating more and easier ways to fraud, both sides aren't coming out looking very good.

Why does nobody propose a law to require voter IDs while simultaneously proposing a law that makes those voter IDs free? Just one small example.
They have to be free per the 24th amendment. Do you even Constitution, Bruh!
I have no problem with voter ID if they are free and easily accessible.
The problem is they may make them free, but only available on full moon days or some shit like that.
 
lol rudy flew out of the courtroom and didn't even bother to put on a show for the cameras this time. lies have consequences and who would have ever guessed that such a staunch member of the party of law & order and personal accountability would take such an issue with being held accountable for his own crimes?

the jury is deliberating. i wouldn't be surprised if they awarded the freemans the full 48 million they are asking for and then some. and then they should sue him again for the defamatory comments he made about them outside of the courtroom in front of the cameras the other day. then let dominion come in and drive the final dagger through his heart!
Cause Rudy knows he is proper fucked, and not talking about chicks he gets to pretend to be his daughter.
Rudy is fucking broke. Just another Trump lawyer who fucked themselves by believing a serial lying 3rd generation trust fund baby, who give zero shits about anyone else but himself.
 
Cause Rudy knows he is proper fucked, and not talking about chicks he gets to pretend to be his daughter.
Rudy is fucking broke. Just another Trump lawyer who fucked themselves by believing a serial lying 3rd generation trust fund baby, who give zero shits about anyone else but himself.

they should garnish any checks to his name, seize his bank accounts, and foreclose his apartment just to help pay his victims.

dunno how thats gonna help out dominion get their piece of the pie when druncle rudy is living under a bridge drinking bottles of sherry and sucking off magats at the truckstop gloryhole just to get his next bottle, but he should have thought about that before he sold his soul to the rapey fraudster and went around defaming people and companies just to help try to mend the defeated orange election-losing rapists shattered ego.

if he went woke and gone broke, thats his own damn fault. he needs to pull himself up by his bootstraps and pay off his debts, no matter which we he went about acquiring them. it's part of being a responsible person.
 
Last edited:

uh oh. i guess one of zesto molesto's all-star lawyers must have checked the wrong box again!

Appeals court again upholds gag order barring Donald Trump from commenting about judge’s staff​


The court ruled the former president’s lawyers used the wrong legal mechanism to fight the restriction.

NEW YORK — A New York appeals court has again upheld a gag order that bars Donald Trump from commenting about court personnel in his civil fraud trial, ruling Thursday that the former president’s lawyers used the wrong legal mechanism to fight the restriction.

A four-judge panel in the state’s mid-level appellate court ruled Thursday that Trump’s lawyers erred by suing trial Judge Arthur Engoron, who imposed the gag order in October after Trump disparaged his law clerk.

Instead, the appellate judges wrote, Trump’s lawyers should’ve followed the normal appeals process by asking Engoron to reverse the gag order and then, if denied, fighting that decision in a higher court.

The appeals court ruling came a day after testimony wrapped in the 2½-month trial in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit. Closing arguments are scheduled for Jan. 11 in the case, which threatens Trump’s real estate empire. Engoron said he hopes to have a verdict by the end of January.

The four-judge panel ruled that Trump’s gag order can’t be challenged that way, citing a prior ruling from the state’s highest court that characterized such lawsuits as an “extraordinary remedy.”


0qwEtD5.jpg


My name is Reek.
 
@BFoe

doesn't get into it too much at all

37:30 (cuing up not working)


Thanks for posting it, and sorry for my delay in responding.

I mean... I just don’t think there’s any basis for what he’s saying, in the law or Constitution (I’m talking specifically about the “he has to be impeached before he can be charged” part). I do see his point about immunity, and yes, we can’t have the POTUS risking criminal charges every time they make an executive decision. Ultimately, my opinion is that it comes down to whether the decisions are made as part of the scope of the duties of the POTUS, and I think it’s very clear that Trump was well outside that. But we’ll see what our friends at the Supreme Court say…
 
I think this poll is a decent indicator that mass mail-in voting isn't the way to go because it makes frauding way easier to do. That's something you want to avoid in an election. Don't you agree?
1. I register to vote
2. The govmint sends me a ballot
3. I vote
4. I mail it back.

We’ve been doing it in Oregon for years and it goes just fine.
30 or 60 minutes? Is that the average? Why make it more difficult for people to line up and wait to vote by banning things like handing out bottles of water?

I don't know what the average is, probably depends on the time of the day and could differ between each polling station. The second part of your post is weird. Obviously the idea should be to have enough polling stations strategically spread out to ensure reasonably short lines and banning something like handing out bottles of water sounds kinda ridiculous.
were in a two party system. One party works its ass off to make it HARDER to vote in neighborhoods and cities that traditionally vote against them. One party shuts down polling stations, has gun toting thugs monitoring drop off stations, and does more gerrymandering than a guy named Jerry Mander who likes to get down
 
Sadly, I don't think this is going to be a one-off case. We're going to see more of these dangerous actions over the coming months.

there better be plenty of police and military presence around the courthouse when orange cosby's sentencing day arrives.
 
Last edited:
1. I register to vote
2. The govmint sends me a ballot
3. I vote
4. I mail it back.

We’ve been doing it in Oregon for years and it goes just fine.



were in a two party system. One party works its ass off to make it HARDER to vote in neighborhoods and cities that traditionally vote against them. One party shuts down polling stations, has gun toting thugs monitoring drop off stations, and does more gerrymandering than a guy named Jerry Mander who likes to get down
You can bet your ass Jerry Mander knows how to party
 
Whether it's gerrymandering, voter supression or creating more and easier ways to fraud, both sides aren't coming out looking very good.

Why does nobody propose a law to require voter IDs while simultaneously proposing a law that makes those voter IDs free? Just one small example.

Don't "both sides" this. Democrats have not engaged in any direct voter suppression measures and have in fact, attempted to expand voting rights as with convicted felons. Democrat districts are gerrymandered but MUCH less so than Republican. The most gerrymandered districts in the Country are Republican districts and theyve recently engaged in racial gerrymandering so egregious this very conservative Supreme Court has had to rule against them because it was flagrant that they specifically wanted black voting districts either diluted or altogether eliminated. And there was even an attempt to simply ignore the Supreme Court ruling, showing the State's contempt for their ow citizens due to political partisanship.

The measure you suggested has been offered before as compromise. Democrats have proposed the existence of voter ID's to exist with the benefit of them being automatically issued to every eligible American citizen, and to be free of cost. Its Republicans who shoot that down every single time it comes to it. Because the motive is clear, Republicans want all the conditions surrounding voting that their base constituents traditionally adhere to, and literally any expansion of that or of voting rights in general, they absolutely hate. This is not a "both sides" thing.
 
Back
Top