Elections Trump Indicted On 91 Counts

[Barteh]

As I already mentioned, even if we were to accept the poll was legit, there is nothing about it that actually points to Donald Trump being cheated out of winning the election. It could very well mean people cheated for Trump and he received extra votes because of fraud.

It's worthless. Look at the comments in that Yahoo article from The Heartland employees. Do they sound like objective professionals? They're using Fox News buzzwords, talking about the Deep State and shit lmao.

This is their director of communications:

"Anyone who believed that the 2020 election was ‘the most secure in American history’ trusted a corrupt Deep State more than their eyes and common sense."

BTW, it looks like part of this polling was done as an online survey, which are utterly worthless.

"A new national telephone and online survey by Rasmussen Reports and the Heartland Institute finds that 21% of Likely U.S. voters ..."

If online surveys were accurate, Ron Paul would have been elected POTUS with 90% of the vote in 2012.

Online survey =/= anybody and their mum can vote however many times they want. Rasmussen is a pretty reputable polling organization which has overall been quite close to reality with their predictions. I'd expect them to verify identities of the people they're polling. Otherwise their other polls wouldn't be so solid as well.

You're correct about the fact that this doesn't show you who benefited from the cheating. But when we see that the widespread fraud is mainly because of the insecure mail-in votes and a majority of mail-in votes were from democrats it's definitely suggesting something.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

So True.
Is this women still working in Trumps case ? if so just wow but guess the media attention od being his lawyer is worth it for her even if payment is unlikely.

yeah she's working in his fraud case and his january defamation case as well. i doubt she'll be getting paid. i guess the devoted christian family man who has cheated on every wife he's ever had will have to go and find a new melania lookalike to be seen with in public because now his wife won't dare to be seen with him unless its one of the two days per year where she is contractually obligated to lol.

i doubt stormy daniels will bother to return Tiny's calls either. she's busy getting dicked down by real men, and they don't even have to pay.

 

[HOLA]

Online survey =/= anybody and their mum can vote however many times they want.

Why not? You think people can do that in a presidential election, but they can't for an online survey from The Heartland Institute?!?!

You ain't going to prison if you get busted cheating in an online survey.

Rasmussen is a pretty reputable polling organization which has overall been quite close to reality with their predictions. I'd expect them to verify identities of the people they're polling. Otherwise their other polls wouldn't be so solid as well.

As I already showed you, they aren't. They gave Trump a 51% approval rating when everyone else had him in the low 30's. That can't be explained by the margin of error. It's ludicrous.

You're correct about the fact that this doesn't show you who benefited from the cheating. But when we see that the widespread fraud is mainly because of the insecure mail-in votes

We do not see that. Almost every single example of actual fraud, with people being caught and convicted of it, comes from Republicans voting for Trump.

and a majority of mail-in votes were from democrats it's definitely suggesting something.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Online survey =/= anybody and their mum can vote however many times they want. Rasmussen is a pretty reputable polling organization which has overall been quite close to reality with their predictions. I'd expect them to verify identities of the people they're polling. Otherwise their other polls wouldn't be so solid as well.

You're correct about the fact that this doesn't show you who benefited from the cheating. But when we see that the widespread fraud is mainly because of the insecure mail-in votes and a majority of mail-in votes were from democrats it's definitely suggesting something.

thats nice. go make the argument in court and prove that the election fairy and the easter bunny is real. big claims require big evidence. legal disputes are not resolved in the parking lot of a landscaping store or in some online poll. "people are saying" is not evidence of any crime. that's just hearsay.

 

[Barteh]

Why not? You think people can do that in a presidential election, but they can't for an online survey from The Heartland Institute?!?!

You ain't going to prison if you get busted cheating in an online survey.

As I already showed you, they aren't. They gave Trump a 51% approval rating when everyone else had him in the low 30's. That can't be explained by the margin of error. It's ludicrous.

We do not see that. Almost every single example of actual fraud, with people being caught and convicted of it, comes from Republicans voting for Trump.

Right so we're just straight back to denying the evidence. Ignoring what your own eyes can see, the standard playbook.

thats nice. go make the argument in court and prove that the election fairy and the easter bunny is real. big claims require big evidence. legal disputes are not resolved in the parking lot of a landscaping store or in some online poll. "people are saying" is not evidence of any crime. that's just hearsay.

A complete deflection when being confronted with evidence. No surprises there.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Right so we're just straight back to denying the evidence. Ignoring what your own eyes can see, the standard playbook.

evidence of criime is presented and proven in a court of law. just what evidence are you talking about? all the evidence too damning to bring to court? the kind of evidence they forgot to bring to court? the kind of evidence they never once brought to court? the kind of evidence that only a crackhead pillow salesman is allowed to lay eyes on, and there's just been so much of that evidence coming in so fast that he can hardly keep up and he's still gotta go through all of it but he's gonna bring it to court any day now but just not today right?

you chucklefucks are so adorable. this shit is still real to you even after 1135 days and no evidence. you know back when i was a very young impressionable child that didn't understand shit about the world and just believed everything people would tell me without a question in the world, i once believed in santa claus too just because somebody told me that santa was real.

 

[Barteh]

evidence is presented and proven in a court of law. just what evidence are you talking about? all the evidence that they forgot to bring to court? the kind of evidence that only a crackhead pillow salesman is allowed to lay eyes on, and there's just been so much of that evidence coming in so fast that he can hardly keep up and he's still gotta go through all of it but he's gonna bring it to court any day now but just not today right?

you chucklefucks are so adorable. this shit is still real to you even after 1135 days and no evidence. you know back when i was a very young impressionable child that didn't understand shit about the world and just believed everything people would tell me without a question in the world, i once believed in santa claus too just because somebody told me that santa was real.

No it's not, I just presented you with evidence and you completely deflected and avoided the subject. Twice in a row now.

How sad and weak!

 

[HOLA]

Right so we're just straight back to denying the evidence. Ignoring what your own eyes can see, the standard playbook.

Projection. You just dick tucked from all the responses I gave you.

There is no evidence.

If there was it would be presented in court, not on a Yahoo article with 4 comments on it.

A complete deflection when being confronted with evidence. No surprises there.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

No it's not, I just presented you with evidence and you completely deflected and avoided the subject

yes it is. evidence of crime is presented and proven in a court of law. not in a fanfiction novel, a hollywood movie, or in a parking lot of a landscaping store across the street from the dildo shop. after all, the kangaroo courtroom of social media and republican think-tank websites do not have the authority to overturn elections or resolve legal disputes.

i'm not avoiding you at all. i'm not even sure what evidence you are talking about, so can you kindly just provide me with the docket number of the case containing the very evidence of which you are talking about?

let's see who's avoiding who here. don't give me words. give me a docket number, that way i can punch it in to PACER and take a look at all of this evidence that you speak of for myself, and then i will give you my opinion of such evidence and we can discuss it. i'm all ears bro.

 

[Barteh]

Projection. You just dick tucked from all the responses I gave you.

There is no evidence.

If there was it would be presented in court, not on a Yahoo article with 4 comments on it.

I showed you their polling average of around 800 polls in total, you respond with one outlier. Then you come up with some fantasy about that now suddenly it's opposite day and it's Republicans that are frauding when all evidence points to the opposite. Earlier you randomly brought up some climate fantasies. I see through the bullshit easily buddy.

yes it is. evidence of crime is presented and proven in a court of law. not in a fanfiction novel, a hollywood movie, or in a parking lot of a landscaping store across the street from the dildo shop. after all, the kangaroo courtroom of social media and republican think-tank websites do not have the authority to overturn elections or resolve legal disputes.

i'm not avoiding you at all. i'm not even sure what evidence you are talking about, so can you kindly just provide me with the docket number of the case containing the very evidence of which you are talking about?

let's see who's avoiding who here. don't give me words. give me the docket number, that way i can punch it in to PACER and take a look at all of this evidence that you speak of for myself, and then i will give you my opinion of such evidence and we can discuss it. i'm all ears bro.

Yes let me just proof that you signed the mail-in ballot for your mum and 20% of all voters committed a similar crime. Or maybe we can just trace individual votes back to see at what point the fraud occurred. Oh nevermind none of that is possible. So just stick your head in the sand and pretend it never happened just because your side is the one who cheated.

 

[HOLA]

evidence of criime is presented and proven in a court of law. just what evidence are you talking about? all the evidence too damning to bring to court? the kind of evidence they forgot to bring to court? the kind of evidence they never once brought to court? the kind of evidence that only a crackhead pillow salesman is allowed to lay eyes on, and there's just been so much of that evidence coming in so fast that he can hardly keep up and he's still gotta go through all of it but he's gonna bring it to court any day now but just not today right?

you chucklefucks are so adorable. this shit is still real to you even after 1135 days and no evidence. you know back when i was a very young impressionable child that didn't understand shit about the world and just believed everything people would tell me without a question in the world, i once believed in santa claus too just because somebody told me that santa was real.

"it's still real to me dammit!"

haha.

What was Trump's legal team's record in court, again? 1 win and 66 losses?

It's like an MMA fighter with a 1-66 record, talking shit about how everyone is scared of all your skills and they're ducking you. Dude, come back to reality. It's time for a career change, you obviously are showing signs of CTE.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

"it's still real to me dammit!"

haha.

What was Trump's legal team's record in court, again? 1 win and 66 losses?

It's like an MMA fighter with a 1-66 record, talking shit about how everyone is scared of all your skills and they're ducking you. Dude, come back to reality. It's time for a career change, you obviously are showing signs of CTE.

well i'm glad that you asked that because there was a small error in your post and i feel like it needs to be corrected. let's get straight to the real world facts here, which are not at all subject to the rubes feelings in the very least.

It has now been 1135 days since the "stolen" election, which Zesto Molesto lost 306-232 to Sleepy Joe. Dementia Joe won the popular vote by over 7 Million votes. Orange Cosby's post-election litigation record currently stands at 1-65. There have now been precisely 0 allegations of any type of fraud that were made on the orange rapists behalf throughout any court in the land, and there have now been exactly 0 allegations of any type of fraud that were proven on the orange sexual predators behalf throughout any court in the land.

Surely they are going to release the kraken any day now. It just won't be today. Make sure to get your donations in to the Save America Team so that private citizen Molestini Cheetolini can make America great again!

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Yes let me just proof that you signed the mail-in ballot for your mum and 20% of all voters committed a similar crime. Or maybe we can just trace individual votes back to see at what point the fraud occurred. Oh nevermind none of that is possible. So just stick your head in the sand and pretend it never happened just because your side is the one who cheated.

that doesnt look like a docket number to me. stop ducking and try again.

 

[Barteh]

that doesnt look like a docket number to me. stop ducking and try again.

And yet another deflection. Are you paid to disrupt constructive conversation or are you just a little bit different from regular people?

 

[idrankyourbeer]

And yet another deflection. Are you paid to disrupt constructive conversation or are you just a little bit different from regular people?

that doesnt look like a docket number to me. stop tucking your dick and clucking and try again.

evidence of crime is presented and proven in a court of law. not in a fanfiction novel, a hollywood movie, or in a parking lot of a landscaping store across the street from the dildo shop. after all, the kangaroo courtroom of social media and republican think-tank websites do not have the authority to overturn elections or resolve legal disputes.

can you kindly just provide me with the docket number of the case containing the very evidence of which you are talking about? don't give me words. give me the docket number, that way i can punch it in to PACER and take a look at all of this evidence that you speak of for myself, and then i will give you my opinion of such evidence and we can discuss it. until you can provide me with a docket number, i have no idea what evidence you are even talking about, because evidence of crime is brought forward to court.

i have all of trump's legal filings right in front of me. it's rather embarassing for the guy because all references to fraud are basically non-existant and all it mostly was is challenging a bunch of election procedures and voter rolls. but all you need to do is give me the number to punch in and i'll know what evidence you are talking about. until then it might as well be just as imaginary and non-existant as santa claus and the election fraud fairy. i can't give you my opinion on evidence of crime if it was never once brought forward as evidence. but if you can just provide me with a simple docket number to a case which contains this very evidence of which you speak of, i'll be glad to take a look at that evidence and then give you my opinion on it.

 

[Barteh]

that doesnt look like a docket number to me. stop tucking your dick and clucking and try again.

evidence of crime is presented and proven in a court of law. not in a fanfiction novel, a hollywood movie, or in a parking lot of a landscaping store across the street from the dildo shop. after all, the kangaroo courtroom of social media and republican think-tank websites do not have the authority to overturn elections or resolve legal disputes.

can you kindly just provide me with the docket number of the case containing the very evidence of which you are talking about? don't give me words. give me the docket number, that way i can punch it in to PACER and take a look at all of this evidence that you speak of for myself, and then i will give you my opinion of such evidence and we can discuss it. until you can provide me with a docket number, i have no idea what evidence you are even talking about, because evidence is brought to court.

i have all of trump's legal filings right in front of me. all you need to do is give me the number to punch in and i'll know what evidence you are talking about. until then it might as well be just as imaginary and non-existant as santa claus and the election fraud fairy. i can't give you my opinion on evidence of crime if it was never once brought forward as evidence. but if you can just provide me with a simple docket number to a case which contains this very evidence of which you speak of, i'll be glad to take a look at that evidence and then give you my opinion on it.

That'll be a funny response to all of the bullshit you spout in other threads. Hopefully I'll remember in the future so I can make some fun of you with low effort easy one liners, while completely ignoring the actual content of the posts.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

That'll be a funny response to all of the bullshit you spout in other threads. Hopefully I'll remember in the future so I can make some fun of you with low effort easy one liners, while completely ignoring the actual content of the posts.

that doesnt look like a docket number to me. evidence of crime is put forward and proven in a court of law, and twiitter and republican think-tank websites do not have the authority to resolve legal disputes.

i have no idea what evidence you have been talking about that i am supposed to be ducking. so for the 4th time now, would you like to try again and provide me with a docket number to which case contains this evidence you speak of? that way i will be able to look that up and i will know what kind of evidence thatt you are talking about and i will be able to give you my own opinion of such evidence. or are you just going to keep on tucking your dick and going cluck cluck cluck? it's your choice. i'll entertain either.

 

[HOLA]

I showed you their polling average of around 800 polls in total, you respond with one outlier.

That was hardly the only example of Rasmussen polls differing wildly from other polls, but shouldn't even one example that egregious be enough to cast doubt on their future polls?

The idea that 51% of Americans approved of Donald Trump in the immediate aftermath of Jan 6th is preposterous. Trump was so toxic even Lady Lindsay Graham said he was finished at the time.

Then you come up with some fantasy about that now suddenly it's opposite day and it's Republicans that are frauding when all evidence points to the opposite.

The Heritage Foundation is a VERY conservative think tank. They keep a database of proven ballot-fraud cases that resulted in an actual criminal conviction in court. There may have been Democrats caught at this point, but in late 2021, 1 year after the election, in EVERYsingle case of voter fraud involving the presidential election, where the culprit's political affiliation was known, was from Republicans! EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.

Every accusation in MAGA Land is a confession.

Earlier you randomly brought up some climate fantasies. I see through the bullshit easily buddy.

*inserts GSP with hands shaking .gif*

 

[Barteh]

that doesnt look like a docket number to me. evidence of crime is put forward and proven in a court of law, and twiitter and republican think-tank websites do not have the authority to resolve legal disputes.

i have no idea what evidence you have been talking about that i am supposed to be ducking. so for the 4th time now, would you like to try again and provide me with a docket number to which this evidence you speak of was provided, that way i will know what kind of evidence thatt you are talking about and i will be able to give you my own opinion? or are you just going to keep on tucking your dick and going cluck cluck cluck?

For the people who might be missing serious discussion and actual evidence of widespread voter fraud during the 2020 election being presented I'll post it again. Let's just ignore the troll trying to derail this thread.

Heartland/Rasmussen Poll: One-in-Five Mail-In Voters Admit to Committing at Least One Kind of Voter Fraud During 2020 Election

The results of these survey questions appear to show that voter fraud was widespread in the 2020 election, especially among those who cast mail-in ballots. Heartland Institute/Rasmussen Reports Poll, December 12, 2023 Shocking results from a new poll on voter fraud in the 2020 presidential...

finance.yahoo.com

 

[idrankyourbeer]

For the people who might be missing serious discussion and actual evidence of widespread voter fraud during the 2020 election being presented I'll post it again. Let's just ignore the troll trying to derail this thread.

still no docket number huh? it must really sting knowing that evidence of crime is put forward and proven in a court of law and not in the parking lot of landscaping shops, and that twiitter and republican think-tank websites do not have the authority to resolve legal disputes.

i don't see any docket number from you. i guess this means that this "evidence" of crime you speak of simply does not exist. or do we still gotta keep on waiting for them to bring it to court and then prove it? should be any day now, just not today right? stay tuned! i know we've only been hearing that sad little spiel from you chucklefucks for 1135 days now, but maybe the 1136'th time's the charm hey? this shit is still real to me dammit!

do i need to ask you for a 6th time for the docket number to a case which contaiins this evidence you speak of? i still have no idea what evidence you are talking about. all i see you doing is tucking your dick and clucking and going off about your imaginary easter bunnies and election fraud fairies which still havent been proven to exist, and it really doesn't appear that they will be any time soon either.

i don't see any evidence that would suggest any crime here was ever committed. that kind of evidence would have been brought to court a long time ago. but if you are telling me that it has, then i must have missed it somewhere, so just give me the docket number and i'll gladly eat crow! until then i have no idea what evidence you are talking about, because evidence is put forward in court. not in the parking lot of a landscaping shop.