Law Trump Georgia indictment watch

Andy Capp said:
I think that's where the GA RICO charges may come in to play--as in operating a criminal enterprise across multiple states. Seems to me the WI AG could be holding off until Willis is ready to initiate the indictment(s) there. I could easily be wrong though; I'm no law talkin' guy.
Click to expand...
Very possible. I just hope that we get some answers sooner rather than later. It definitely seems like the fake electors could be charged, and probably Sen Ron Johnson too.
 
BFoe said:
Very possible. I just hope that we get some answers sooner rather than later. It definitely seems like the fake electors could be charged, and probably Sen Ron Johnson too.
Click to expand...
Indeed, the sooner the better.

It seems to me the defense will have a difficult time casting doubt on it being a coordinated effort when you had people in GA, MI, and WI, not to mention Trump's lawyers, media personalities, bloggers, etc., all working toward the same illegal goal. And if Trump weren't pushing Stop the Steal none of it would have happened so he is ultimately responsible and needs to pay a steep price for that or it will fuck up your nation something awful, and for a long time.
 
BFoe said:
Very possible. I just hope that we get some answers sooner rather than later. It definitely seems like the fake electors could be charged, and probably Sen Ron Johnson too.
Click to expand...
Further to the above, it wouldn't surprise me if they coordinated to drop indictments in both states at the same time either.

So it was Johnson who led the WI fake electors scheme? There are so many names it's difficult to keep them straight.
 
skold said:
Anyone remember the "Freedom Phone" that all the right wing talking heads were raving on about (for like 2 weeks)?

image-0433a7a15b.jpg


All that ended up being was some cheap chinese knockoff purchased from aliexpress for like $30 and sold to magatards for $500
Click to expand...
her face gives me a headache. her eyes are in different time zones on that face.
 
Super_Nintendo said:
aside from blatant election interference by the fbi and big tech on the hunter laptop/bribery case which you can argue stole the election just based on media narratives, 2020 was one of the most shadiest elections in history. some of the claims were total bullshit, but it feels like everything got swept under a rug and we got zero answers on a lot issues that were raised.

if what they're saying actually happened, what good is a lawsuit if you can't untangle the evidence (ie. legit ballots but fraudulently casted) or look at the evidence in the first place (destroyed evidence)?

once you bake a cake, you can't unbake it, so good luck proving anything. democrats are the dirtiest most dishonest people you can imagine.

chopping off the genitals of children is "health care"
"men are women"
a post apocalyptic warzone is "mostly peaceful", but a bunch of 80 IQ hicks with no weapons are "insurrectionists" and worse than the 19 hijackers and j6 was "worse than 9/11 and pearlor harbor combined".

if these dirtbags look you straight in the face and lie about that, you bet your ass they're working 24/7 to steal an election.

inb4 some chud writes a nonsensical 10 page essay (you know who that is) or responds with "cope harder". i don't care what anyone says, 81 million did not for that corrupt, kid sniffing, CCP puppet.
Click to expand...
You are not even trying.
 
Damien Karras said:
If he does make it to jail, my prediction is he'll Epstein himself within the first 3 months. Reality hits hard when you hear the metal bar doors cling shut for the first time, and having to take a shit with people looking. Trump is a germaphobe too
Click to expand...
44nutman said:
It’s free Speech to break into a voting machine. The Derp State is attacking Freeze Peach.
GA just ensured a victory for Trump in 2024.
Checkmate Libtards!
Click to expand...


He's not going to jail. Stop saying this, it sounds immature as fuck.

If he's convicted he'll be on a special form of house arrest, he will never see the inside of a cell.
 
Mack Yancy said:
He's not going to jail. Stop saying this, it sounds immature as fuck.

If he's convicted he'll be on a special form of house arrest, he will never see the inside of a cell.
Click to expand...
Where did the post of mine you quoted say anything about jail.?
 
Andy Capp said:
Further to the above, it wouldn't surprise me if they coordinated to drop indictments in both states at the same time either.

So it was Johnson who led the WI fake electors scheme? There are so many names it's difficult to keep them straight.
Click to expand...
I don’t know if he was in charge of it, but he was definitely involved. I am also curious about Dan Kelly’s role. He’s the dude that just lost our state Supreme Court election. He provided some kind of “legal advice” to these douchebags. Maybe his advice was legit, or maybe not. We don’t really know.
 
Quick Quiz. Did Trump say....

(A) “find me the votes.”

OR....

(B) “I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state.”


 
BFoe said:
I don’t know if he was in charge of it, but he was definitely involved. I am also curious about Dan Kelly’s role. He’s the dude that just lost our state Supreme Court election. He provided some kind of “legal advice” to these douchebags. Maybe his advice was legit, or maybe not. We don’t really know.
Click to expand...
Yes, I saw that story. I'd say he's proper fucked.
 
KaNesDeath said:
Both. If i recall correctly he stated B first in the phone call an when he didnt get desired answers A was stated.
Click to expand...

The transcript, provided by CNN says different. The answer is (B).

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/03/politics/trump-brad-raffensperger-phone-call-transcript/index.html

Here is Turley's take on it.

While others have portrayed the statement as a raw call for fabricating the votes, it seems more likely that Trump was swatting back claims that there was no value to a statewide recount by pointing out that he wouldn’t have to find a statistically high number of votes to change the outcome of the election. It is telling that many politicians and pundits refuse to even acknowledge that obvious alternate meaning.
​
This is another case of Leftists / Democrats deciding what other people mean in the worst possible way and then attacking them for the Straw man they have erected. Democrat Playbook 101.
 
Whippy McGee said:
The transcript, provided by CNN says different. The answer is (B).

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/03/politics/trump-brad-raffensperger-phone-call-transcript/index.html

Here is Turley's take on it.

While others have portrayed the statement as a raw call for fabricating the votes, it seems more likely that Trump was swatting back claims that there was no value to a statewide recount by pointing out that he wouldn’t have to find a statistically high number of votes to change the outcome of the election. It is telling that many politicians and pundits refuse to even acknowledge that obvious alternate meaning.
​
This is another case of Leftists / Democrats deciding what other people mean in the worst possible way and then attacking them for the Straw man they have erected. Democrat Playbook 101.
Click to expand...
What was the law he was breaking that trump threatened him with?
 
Whippy McGee said:
The transcript, provided by CNN says different. The answer is (B).

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/03/politics/trump-brad-raffensperger-phone-call-transcript/index.html

Here is Turley's take on it.

While others have portrayed the statement as a raw call for fabricating the votes, it seems more likely that Trump was swatting back claims that there was no value to a statewide recount by pointing out that he wouldn’t have to find a statistically high number of votes to change the outcome of the election. It is telling that many politicians and pundits refuse to even acknowledge that obvious alternate meaning.
​
This is another case of Leftists / Democrats deciding what other people mean in the worst possible way and then attacking them for the Straw man they have erected. Democrat Playbook 101.
Click to expand...
Nonsense.
There had already been an audit and a recount. Every vote in that state had been counted multiple times, the state had certified the results twice. There were no more votes to find.
 
Lol, so the court posted the indictment before the grand jury was finished? What a clown show <45>

Trump has these people so broken they are trippin over themselves.

Just like with this DC judge. He is literally posting quotes from her own rulings, and the media is trying to say he is attacking and undermining her lmao. Classic
 
KaNesDeath said:
Both. If i recall correctly he stated B first in the phone call an when he didnt get desired answers A was stated.
Click to expand...

According to the transcript provided by CNN. It was only (B). But, that's the thing. We get a misrepresentation of what happened by the MSM and Democrats (Straw Man erected) and then they attack it instead of what was actually said (straw man attacked). Trump said (B). (B) is nothing more than any politician has said in the past on a close election. This is yet another made up law suit like the others. But, the MSM has a legion of Left Cult robots that will believe and repeat (A) and feel like the Orange Ogre has line stepped yet again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,134
Messages
57,970,012
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top