International "Trump-class Battleships"

Good news for the shipyards but people seem to think what its called is what REALLY matters. :rolleyes:
 
ShadowRun said:
Love the outrage, it is stupid his name is attached to a ship though. Don't worry the next dem president will remove that and get to put USS George Floyd

Here are the major warships (combatants like destroyers, submarines, littoral combat ships, etc.) that were commissioned into the US Navy during Joe Biden's presidency (2021–2025). Approximately 27 in total, primarily Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, Virginia-class submarines, and the remaining Littoral Combat Ships
Click to expand...

I mean, this is pretty dishonest, there's a difference between a ship and a ship-class, you know that right?
 
Gonna step away from my previous post and just ask this question: Who is the most dangerous naval threat and potential opponent?

The answer of course is China.

China is building a deep water navy at an ungodly pace. It has something like 100x the ship building capacity that the US does. The counter point is these are low quality ships that don't match our current capabilities. The reality is twofold:

1) They are rapidly catching up.
2) Quantity has a quality of its own.

Everyone recognizes that drones are the future of warfare. Most people think of aerial platforms when we talk drones but submersible drones would make the most sense to me. I have read the previous posts about size, capacity, and range making this impractical but I disagree. I think we could build some Seadoo-sized deplorable drones with a 500nm range pretty easily. And I wonder how many of those we can produce OUTSIDE OF OUR CURRENT SHIP BUILDING PORTS in lieu of a battleship?

Im reminded of my experiences in GWOT where we were using $1M missiles to blow up $100 tents. In large scale combat operations we already know we do not have the stocks to maintain long term operations.
 
This is what happens when he’s surrounded by a bunch of kiss assess
 
Stoic1 said:
Gonna step away from my previous post and just ask this question: Who is the most dangerous naval threat and potential opponent?

The answer of course is China.

China is building a deep water navy at an ungodly pace. It has something like 100x the ship building capacity that the US does. The counter point is these are low quality ships that don't match our current capabilities. The reality is twofold:

1) They are rapidly catching up.
2) Quantity has a quality of its own.

Everyone recognizes that drones are the future of warfare. Most people think of aerial platforms when we talk drones but submersible drones would make the most sense to me. I have read the previous posts about size, capacity, and range making this impractical but I disagree. I think we could build some Seadoo-sized deplorable drones with a 500nm range pretty easily. And I wonder how many of those we can produce OUTSIDE OF OUR CURRENT SHIP BUILDING PORTS in lieu of a battleship?

Im reminded of my experiences in GWOT where we were using $1M missiles to blow up $100 tents. In large scale combat operations we already know we do not have the stocks to maintain long term operations.
Click to expand...
China is not building a deep water navy, the overwhelming majority of their ships have under 1000km range.

It is a coastal navy not a deep sea navy. Despite the quantity of ships they're still trailing in overall tonnage.

Putting men on boats doesn't mean you have a navy. A navy requires decades and even centuries of shared experience and developing that into the necessary tactics and traditions.
 
USS Defiant is an awesome name. Trump class also sounds badass

The president always holds the Trump card! (The massive US navy)
 
johnsmithjohnson said:
"Child Rapist" class then. Who cares what it's called and it's named after a child rapist who wears orange women's make up.

Think of the dockworkers you heckin libtards
Click to expand...
Grow up already. Billions going to US shipyards is more important than your derangement.
 
Yea this is just dumb as fuck. We know that battleships are not effective in modern days. I guess when its not your money, you just blow it in the dumbest ways possible. Where are our conservative friends at to bitch about wasteful spending?
 
Keep your bitching about the Epstein stuff in the appropriate threads. It is considered derailing. You can catch points for spamming it outside of the correct threads.
 
In his quest to be “bigger than Hitler”, he’s going full Liberace.
images
 
LMP said:
Keep your bitching about the Epstein stuff in the appropriate threads. It is considered derailing. You can catch points for spamming it outside of the correct threads.
Click to expand...

Suggesting a poster is in the files, even if a joke, is cardable and bannable.

Not that I reported anything, since I don’t care about attacks from shit posters, but others may not be as easy going.
 
cottagecheesefan said:
Suggesting a poster is in the files, even if a joke, is cardable and bannable.

Not that I reported anything, since I don’t care about attacks from shit posters, but others may not be as easy going.
Click to expand...
Already dealt with.
 
LMP said:
Yea this is just dumb as fuck. We know that battleships are not effective in modern days. I guess when its not your money, you just blow it in the dumbest ways possible. Where are our conservative friends at to bitch about wasteful spending?
Click to expand...

Didn't they tell you? It's not military bloat - its creating tons of jobs for labor and manufacturing. All domestic too!

Government overreach does not apply to border security, military expansion, corporate welfare, international trade relations, agricultural/manufacturing subsidies.

All religions conceal their hypocrisies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,668
Messages
58,310,597
Members
175,997
Latest member
joshvegas

Share this page

Back
Top