You know, I am happy to say that I think Canadians are starting to wake up to the perverse incentive structure that has been built up around our media. Whether you like the guy or not, if your head isn't up your ass, you recognize that recently the media absolutely shits on Conservatives more broadly and PP in particular. You might think it's just "oh, he's such a bad guy!" but he's a guy who has never held power and has no track record to his name, yet somehow he seems to get more intensive negative scrutiny than the guy who has been leading for eight years and has overseen a rolling series of train wrecks in Canada. You might think that it's generally left-leaning bias in journalists and I'm sure that plays a role, but it all makes sense when you consider that t
he guy has been very clear that he wants to defund the CBC, and Canadian media more broadly in generally.
What's the effect of this? PP's position that he's publicly stated - and, so far, he is far from releasing a full policy platform, but he's almost two years out from an election - is that he wants to make sure a majority of these journalists lose their jobs. This isn't just some unpopular policy position for them - they're in a position of "write to support the Liberals" or "join Rachel Gilmore making tiktok videos while playing-pretend at journalism." The simple reality is that Canadian journalism at large isn't bringing in much revenue, and the CBC in particular is state-funded media that costs Canadians to
the tune of 1.2 billion in a year so they can push shit that
fewer and fewer people actually like watching/listening to - with a side order of pushing candidates that agree to fund them.
People oftentimes yak about things being bad for democracy, but you want to know what is actually, honest to god, bad for democracy in Canada? Create an incentive structure where the people who report the news only get to keep getting paid if they subtly - and sometimes not so subtly - push one of the country's major parties over another... And that's exactly where we're at in Canada. There doesn't need to be orders from any particular party to report with a bias - but reporters are given the decision of writing positive and negatives pieces on one figure who says "
I'm going to give you billions whether your reporting actually interests Canadians to the tune of billions" versus one guy who says "
I'm going to cut your funding and let you sink or float on your own merits." When they get through giving themselves Canadian media awards and actually do they math, they quickly figure out that relying on their own merits will leave them unemployed in short order... And they have been reporting with exactly the bias you'd expect from someone whose job is on the line - and they're doing it with the effect of influencing Canadian elections. Again, you want to see an actual threat to Canadian democracy? This is it, and the people who are supposed to be whistleblowers on such things are the ones doing it.