- Joined
- Aug 11, 2022
- Messages
- 2,070
- Reaction score
- 6,333
Uncle Dana is 100% responsible for that shit show.
Do you know who Clark Rogers is? Temu version? It's an amalgamation. Think of another "Clark" character in comicsSays Clark Rogers Temu version of Steve Rogers.
No they don't, and it's provably untrue as well.is he even a champion at anything?
rules says the interim champ gets stripped
the moment the champ fights
Why should Tom vacate because Jones is ducking? Guy can crushed and bullied as a HW at lhw and Ducked HW at its peak and used gear between breakfast and brunchWe all know Jon isn’t gonna fight him, it would absolutely tarnish Jones’ legacy as a legitimate champ, a huge spit in the UFC’s face and the bald goof would go on suicide watch claiming Jones is the GOAT.
Jones is a chicken shit, his accolades at HW are garbage. Tom’s wasting his time chasing a skinny fat HW Jones, it’s embarrassing.
Far worse when you are a career HW ducking HW and using gear to beat dinosaurs and manletsNo they don't, and it's probably untrue as well.
Big Nog didn't get stripped on his interim title when Randy Couture came back and defended the belt.
The reason interim champs usually stop holding the interim belt upon the return of the champion is because the champion generally fights them upon their return. So either they win and become undisputed, or they lose and the champ remains and the interim loses his belt in the unification.
Jon has elected to not fight Tom, which leaves his status as champion very much in dispute, hence no reason for Tom to have his own (less) disputed title taken away.
No, he doesnt.Tom already owns the ONLY Undisputed HW belt.
is he even a champion at anything?
rules says the interim champ gets stripped
the moment the champ fights
The difference there of course was Nog/Mir had already been signed before Randy/Brock and they had already done TUF together. They were the original first title fight, regardless of event chronology.No they don't, and it's provably untrue as well.
Big Nog didn't get stripped of his interim title when Randy Couture came back and defended the belt.
The reason interim champs usually stop holding the interim belt upon the return of the champion is because the champion generally fights them upon their return. So either they win and become undisputed, or they lose and the champ remains and the interim loses his belt in the unification.
Jon has elected to not fight Tom, which leaves his status as champion very much in dispute, hence no reason for Tom to have his own (less) disputed title taken away.
I suppose what burns me is the inconsistency, its not a rule and each case is treated individually and decided mostly based on the fighters popularity and ability to draw fans.That’s basically how it always was though. It’s only since Jones got a belt that this has ever happened. Multiple champs have gotten stripped for avoiding opponents with lesser of a claim than Tom and a lot, lot faster. GDR and Nicco Montano are the most recent two I can think of.
Jon/Stipe was signed after Tom was the interim champ. The fact a fight was signed and didn't happen doesn't mean a fucking thing.- Jon/Stipe was signed first
Company belts, they make up their own rules, there are none of them.I suppose what burns me is the inconsistency, its not a rule and each case is treated individually and decided mostly based on the fighters popularity and ability to draw fans.
Truthfully I really don't expect change about this. The UFC just drops the "we're an entertainment company" line when they need to leverage things lol
A lot of Sherdoggers aren't prepared for the very real scenario that the UFC treats this exactly like McGregor/Tony where BOTH were stripped for a new vacant title even though Tony was part of that vacant title fight. They didn't just promote him and have him defend against Khabib, they wanted him to fight Khabib for a new title.Interim belts are created on necessity of putting a "championship level fight", not really because of the competition, in boxing the orgs usually "mandate" a fight, if said fighter refuses to fight the #1 guy then the belt goes vacant, awarded to the interim champion if there is any, the UFC doesnt have this rules, they drag this until they strong arm champions into defending, unless they run into a Mcgregor level fighter or in this case, Jon Jones, and they end up stripping the champion but only until they have exhausted months of trying.
It's been this long and you guys still refuse to acknowledge that the real reason interim champs go next is because they're the winner of the original contender who had the title shot vs a new contender. Of course that person goes next.Jon/Stipe was signed after Tom was the interim champ. The fact a fight was signed and didn't happen doesn't mean a fucking thing.
Do you think the UFC should have stripped Tom so that Jon could defend his belt against Dan Henderson? Ya know, since that fight "was signed first"
Who cares? Jones is no draw that's why they cant pay him FU money, he doesn't bring it in. Besides, if all else fails, he can always crush Stipe in 1 round instead of 3.
I like how everybody's response exposes what I've said for months now: none of you care about whether the interim title should exist or not which is the only real question.
You all instead care about it being a pathway to Tom becoming champ without fighting. Some seemingly care that Tom gets more money. Others that it keeps Tom #1 contender without fighting. Those are your justifications for it and they're laughably absurd. They all have nothing to do with whether we need an interim at the moment. Which we don't.
His belt should've been stripped the moment Jon/Stipe started. There's no point in having an interim belt after the champ's already returned.
A lot of Sherdoggers aren't prepared for the very real scenario that the UFC treats this exactly like McGregor/Tony where BOTH were stripped for a new vacant title even though Tony was part of that vacant title fight. They didn't just promote him and have him defend against Khabib, they wanted him to fight Khabib for a new title.
They're all just parroting to strip Jon because they think Tom will automatically become champ when he may still need to win a title fight.
I thought they should have made a "Legacy" belt for Stipe vs Jon but they didn't and if you read between the lines the answer as to Why is simple.He gets PPV points etc as the interim champ. It comes with more pay. Why would he vacate when Jones should have vacated and fought Stipe for the Big Boy BMF belt instead? We made a BMF belt for much less. Why didn't they just create one for the Jones vs Stipe fight and let the division move on.
Tom doesn't need an interim title for Jones to defend against him though. There's no such thing as an interim unification bout, it's just marketing. Only the actual belt is on the line. Whether Tom has it or not is completely irrelevant to the title as it disappears the moment the fight starts anyways.Or, dumbass...maybe we'd like to you know, actually get some sort of indication if Jones plans to unify or not. Some of us actually like seeing the best fighters fight each other. So ideally Jones would say he does in fact want to fight Tom. But if he decides he doesn't, then at least we can figure out who Tom WILL fight next for the belt.
It's not that difficult.
There isn't any rule that says that is what happens and in fact there is precedent that indicates the opposite.is he even a champion at anything?
rules says the interim champ gets stripped
the moment the champ fights