- Joined
- Jun 3, 2009
- Messages
- 86,782
- Reaction score
- 26,446
That sounds terrible I wish Universal would make some Hulk movies if not give the rrights back to Marvel.
I might be in the minority here I enjoyed the Hulk moves though I had some Problems with them and Eric Bana is my favorite Banner, I also liked the PH animated movie to bad they didn't make an
Just a slight correction. Marvel Studios owns the movie rights to Hulk but Universal still has the distribution rights. Marvel can make a solo Hulk movie if they want to. If they do, Universal gets to distribute it.
As for Marvel's holdup on a solo Hulk movie, read below:
Update: June 22, 2015
Breakdown of HULK Movie Production and Distribution Rights
![]()
Back in April, Mark Ruffalo revealed that Universal owns the distribution rights to a solo Hulk movie. "As far as a Hulk movie, a standalone Hulk movie, Marvel doesn't really have the rights to that yet," said Ruffalo. "That's still Universal's property, so there's that issue. That's a big impediment to moving forward with that. Now I don't think that's insurmountable, by the way, but I don't know where it's going from here for me."
A Forbes article expands on Ruffalo's statement. Marvel owns the film production rights to the Hulk. They have since 2005, after Universal's character license lapsed since a follow-up to Ang Lee's 2003 film Hulk had not yet entered into production. In the first quarter of 2006, then-Marvel Entertainment chairman Morton Handel announced in an earnings report that the rights to Hulk and Iron Man had reverted to Marvel; later that year, the studio also regained film rights to Captain America and Thor.
Now the complication: Universal still retains distribution rights to the Hulk, along with the right of first refusal. In other words, Marvel can make their movies without any interference from Universal, but Universal decides whether or not they want to act as distributor. That being said, if Universal opts not to distribute, Disney would then immediately be able to scoop up the distribution rights. So, for Universal: Nothing to do with production; distribution rights are dependent on exercising that option.
Marvel's Iron Man, Iron Man 2, Captain America: The First Avenger, and Thor were all distributed by Paramount. Marvel's deal with Sony as it pertains to using Spider-Man, Marvel can use the character for team-ups while Sony can continue to produce and distribute their own Spidey-centric films. So it's obvious that Marvel Studios is willing and able to make arrangements with other Hollywood power players.
So if a Hulk movie is possible, why isn't it probable? As Forbes sums up, there are three reasons:
1) Previous Hulk films have not been, relative to other Marvel films, as critically or financially successful for the studio and thus pose a greater risk for developing another standalone feature. Coupled with the extremely high cost in special effects if you were going to make a film in which Banner is The Hulk for most of the movie, make it a dicey investment.
2) The Hulk seems to work better as a wildcard member of a team rather than the central character shouldering the entire movie; in short: he's a supporting character.
3) Reimagining the Hulk as anything more than a rage monster has not impressed audiences in past films.
Who Owns the Hulk? A Breakdown of Movie Production and Distribution Rights